Sentences with phrase «religious people use»

The religious people use from religion for checking with mental pressure well.

«It is likely that some people use their ideas about science to make sense of the world and for emotional compensation in difficult situations in the same way that religious people use their supernatural beliefs,» Farias says.

Atheists believe the mysteries can be revealed by reason while religious people use their religious dogma.

Yes, not only religious people use the word «heart» either to express emotions.

Well Vic I consider that to be a cop out that religious people use because they know they have no way of proving what they believe to be true.

Religious people use fear to get their way.

Religious people use a lot of jargon to encourage people to think in sound bites and not spend too much time thinking about they're saying.

I've always thought it funny that religious people use the term «humanist» as a label for reality - based philosophies.

They never seem to realize the amount of faith they put in their science of the day to bridge the gaps between absolute facts and nice sounding theories is very similar to the faith religious people use to fill in their gaps in empirical evidence.

I can only say that I do this when religious people use the «bible» as a historical text.

Evidence points to theories and they're reputable and so I trust those more than a religious person using the bible as the only source of proof for history, science, philosophy, ect...

I have no respect religious people using their imanginary friend to validate their political goals.

How can a religious person use the term «religion» in a derogative sense?

Not exact matches

Walshe also critically flags how — again, at the point of consent — Facebook's review process deploys examples of the social aspects of its platform (such as how it can use people's information to «suggest groups or other features or products») as a tactic for manipulating people to agree to share religious affiliation data, for example.

They managed to deliver tax breaks for the rich and oil companies, that's indisputable, but not on any of the «moral» issues they've used since the early 70s to get votes from religious people.

In a study that comes as a surprise to approximately no Christian under the age of 40, the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project says technology use among religious people is no different than among anybody else.

The people who resisted the Civil Rights movement in the south, many of whom used religious arguments, people who classified Blacks as animals, were degraded and debased by their own actions: turning fire hoses on children, setting dogs on peaceful marchers, lynching, firebombing churches...

But of course and religious quotings you consider as poison because you want to be deafening and blinding your self from recognizing the existence of GOD the Creator of the universe...!?! Where ever you head you will find GOD and GOD loving people so get used to it... You are running and running away but you can't run away from your self...!

Tell me, if the school charged the actual market value for the use of this space and the use of equipment, etc. and if that market value actually reflected the cost to the public, then the issue might become clearer to you because these religious people would scream at having to pay full price and the cost of any damages they may inflict upon the public property they are using illegally.

Isn't this what so many of us don't like about people who use religious tradition as a means for explaining their behavior... they're not CONSISTENT?

The Christian Right wants public money to be used for private religious education (vouchers), buildings and services to be used for private religious purposes (this article), and they want subsidies in the form of tax breaks, special exemptions of other sorts, and they even want to destroy Aid to Needy Families so they can drive people into seeking help at their private religious «missions» where you are not allowed to eat unless you are a Christian, and so on.

Apparently, they assumed religious people would be technology - afraid Luddites — or perhaps that those who use technology become less religious.

Ironically, it is religious condemnation that drives the gay person into committing the very acts that are then used to condemn their lifestyle.

A religious person will use any ONE quote in their bible to defend the whole of the bible as truth.

Why blame the religious people when they're just using the system the way it was meant to be used?

You use god as a crutch and an excuse as all religious people do.

Legally, the county's moratorium may violate a federal law — the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act — which makes it illegal for local governments to place a «substantial burden» on houses of worship and their function.

But Mr. Hayward you use her article as a jumping off point for your own projections on how «religious» people see you SBNR types — liberal, educated, open minded, etc. which doesn't even come from her but from the Shambala Sun!

I believe that birth control can be used by religious people without having a negative effect on someone's faith.

Do you think a religious person could benefit from» give up using the word «God», «spirituality», «Jesus», «Buddha», «Muhammad», «Christianity» and all the rest.»

Sabio says: Do you think a religious person could benefit from» give up using the word «God», «spirituality», «Jesus», «Buddha», «Muhammad», «Christianity» and all the rest.»

Well I sometimes use the Christian label so as not to be oppressed by people like you — for example, when filling out religious preferences for organizations like the Boy Scouts.

You don't think that people can be brainwashed into a belief system with the more subtle indoctrination techniques used by religious organizations and have it stick?

I am for the elimination of hate, fear and control, religion is just the catalyst that people use to hate, fear and control, getting rid of religion won't solve the problem, its like putting a band aid on a severe cut, its temporary, and it just hits the surface, instead we need to go deeper than that to the root cause, I know lots of religious people who don't hate, fear or control, there are also many beliefs such as paganism, Buddism, Taoism, which doesn't use hate fear, and self righteousness to condemn others, I think if maybe more of the most major religions followed there teachings then we wouldn't have as much problems as we do.

For any religious person to crow about having the majority on their side and worse to actually use this as justification for their religious claims is grossly ignorant and WRONG.

I used to live in the south and used to work for a company that was mostly comprised of very religious people.

Lenin, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao, Kim, and many other leaders used Atheism as a tool of oppression and slaughtered millions of religious people, whether they be Muslim, Jew, Christian, Pagan, Hindu, Buddhist, or whatever.

I believe the words truth and belief are used incorrectly by religious peoples around the world.

The reason that it's hard to convince some people that there is an almighty is because we religious people have created the almighty in our own image — in images of forms that we can see, feel, taste, touch, imagine etc. and using properties of time, matter or space that do not actually exist!

For example, there are people in all religions who use it to convince themselves they have evidence their religious beliefs are correct, even when their beliefs conflict with those of other religions, whose followers also claim they have evidence their beliefs are correct.

You have to admit, it seemed like Anon was implying that since religions supposably despise critical thinking... that religious ppl would not either use or be good at critical thinking.

My impression of these religious leaders was that they used tradition and their external «holy appearance» as a means of authority to simply govern people's lives and not truly lead them to God.

I used to believe that our epidemic of religious illiteracy was rooted in large part in a system of public education unwilling and unprepared to teach our young people about the Bible and the world's religions.

The awareness of the particularity, indeed the precious particularity, of our language, «even the language of «God» and «salvation,» made some unwilling to use» it to blanket the religious lives and experiences of people of other faiths.

The great irony is that some religious fundies use the Bible to keep gay people away from their «table», and feasts, using the very texts that the Bible intended to teach hospitality, to do the opposite.

The only reason that the teaching of a «devil» exists in my opinion is because it is a useful tool for religious leaders to use to frighten people into obedience to their edicts.

I'd hate there to be any risk of the perception that the LGBT community was being used as a front for a religious adulterous straight person's agenda.

Behaviour considered idolatrous or potentially idolatrous may include the creation of any type of image of the deity, or of other figures of religious significance such as prophets, saints, and clergy, the creation of images of any person or animal at all, and the use of religious symbols, or secular ones.

I always find it funny listening to a religious person trying to use science in their own arguments.

Secondly, the search for a new social contract where Jean - Jacques Rousseau will be dug out of his grave to help them find new inspiration, and finally, the use of the voluntary NGO organisations, the Church and religious people, to battle against poverty.