The Republicans are in trouble with they continue to let
the religious right run their party.
Not exact matches
Lichtenfeld covers all the basics: stay active and healthy, exercise, play sports, eat
right, socialize a lot with family and friends, meet new friends, keep learning, do volunteer work, be involved in your community,
run for office, attend church or other
religious / spiritual activities, read books and newspapers, check your email and text your friends.
Ugh, no wonder the rest of the world laughs at America with all these
right - wing -
religious - wing - nuts
running around.
The president did the
right thing, but your side is
running around screaming about
religious rights being taken away, and THEY ARE NOT!!!!!!!!
I'm guessing these objections are primarily aimed at gay
rights rather than potential atheists
running religious organizations.
So let me get this straight...
religious organizations fight for their «
right» to
run schools like BYU that virtually write discrimination into their so - called «honor code», but when a school has a policy that forces them to NOT discriminate, that's when they have a problem?
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil
Rights Commission, and will decide whether businesses
run by
religious objectors to gay marriage may refuse to cater a gay wedding.
I do not believe that any church has the
right to
run a hospital or a university on a
religious basis outside of chapel and perhaps counsel.
For example — Often used by many christians as an arguement for intolerence towards human
rights... I pose that every religiously
ran nation like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the
religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to turn this country into, where science and logically thought are frowned upon and knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.
The problem comes from the
Religious Right who have 4 - 7 kids to a family who
run a mock of the government, and the fanatics in the settlements who cause trouble in the West Bank.
Companies like Hobby Lobby and the Catholic -
run hospitals and such that are screaming about their
religious rights are forgetting the fact that providing employment to people doesn't equate to some moral mandate to play God and give or deny those employees their
right to a legal drug or procedure.
Because the same media managers were at war with the fundamentalism of the
religious right in this country, the reporting and commentary tended to become a
running polemic against undifferentiated «
religious fanaticism» that threatened the secular assumptions of Western elites who had been miseducated to believe that religion is a vestigial phenomenon from the unenlightened past.
As Phelps» daughter reminded me, there is a venerable American history of
religious protests against the coercive power of the federal government,
running from the anti-slavery and female suffrage advocacy of nineteenth - century evangelicals to the civil
rights agitation of rabbis and members of the black church.
Colleagues, friends, hopeful Democrats and apprehensive Republicans often ask me if the
Religious Right has
run out of steam.
Funny Black Six, I
ran a search and so far all I get in return for my google search are fear - mongering extreme
religious right - wing groups saying what «will» happen and not what has happened.
More over, any
religious organization who's pastors collect millions of dollars buying personal jets and
running mega churches for profit without paying one dime in taxes do not have the
right to dictate any political, legal, or even moral opinion in this country.
Unfortunately, you would be denying our
religious rights to
run our businesses and lives in accordance with biblical principle.
I have no problem with companies
run according to
religious beliefs as long as they don't discriminate against anyone and don't contribute millions of dollars to causes specifically desigened to deny
rights to any group of people.
Most atheists couldn't
run for elected office because there's a taboo against people who don't have the «
right»
religious faith.
Justice is a civil
right and
runs apart from
religious doctrines.
His stances
religious or not are not the norm so people should take anything from him or any of the
religious right with a grain of salt, they're extremist who
run by a different drummer and should be treated that way!!
«Supporters of Schneiderman have been
running ads in Jewish papers this weekend claiming that he would «create a
Religious Rights Unit» in his Attorney Generals office.
There is of course a strong
religious lobby with deep roots in and outside of Labour which does not wholly share our values of social justice, human
rights and equality and which is desperate not to lose its privileges nor one of its best recruiting grounds through
running schools.
It appears that
religious liberty, for the conservative fools
running the legislature, only matters when it's the «liberty» to be as oppressive and cruel as you can think of, but doesn't matter one bit when all you want is the
religious right to marry the people your church loves and supports, regardless of gender.
Once all these folks have made their purchases, they could all
run their respective countries,
religious followings and political interest groups
right from their condos.