I hear a lot of
religious talk about how following God will lead to suffering and pain.
... ive been sick and tired of all the christian
religious talk about mores and morality for a number of years... and in my experience, more they talk about how they are soo moral / christian... the bigger the a ********** they really are.
The so called
religious talk about their god's existence with certainty, then harp on about faith is all that's needed.
Regardless of who I am voting for I am tired of all
the religious talk about the candidates.
Not exact matches
From
religious fervor to reasonable analysis is never the way you want the
talk about your «gee - whiz» product to progress.
Now, if you want to
talk about religious theory, that's a different definition, as
religious theory is based on belief and assumption and written statements that can not be verified or proven without having faith and belief.
Why are you listening to black clerics over this issue, Blacks are having more kids out of wed lock than whites, they are also like white, living in sin, but the church's say nothing
about having babies without a husband or sitting in church and living in sin,
talk about glass houses, and besides the marriages are Cival marriage not
religious marriage, what a bunch of hipocrites..
I personally hear the atheists I know complain more than the
religious people
about others
talking about their beliefs, could just be the people I know though.
Whenever I hear
religious people
talk about what they believe, I always find myself amazed at how crazy they are.
She
talks about religious persecution by state churches yet like so many evangelicals she really means that the evangelicals should be the state church in America.
I am
talking about their
religious values / morals / laws and how they should be kept out of our nation's legal system.
Religious leaders free themselves from the obligation of
talking about evil, by pretending that it's only a matter of free will and people can choose what they want and the consequences are only personal («between you and God»).
Whether the critiques provided are correct or wrong,
religious TV and media gives us the opportunity to reflect on our way of life and
talk with others
about religion.
For years Osteen has been dinged by
religious critics as a theological lightweight - for
talking too much
about sunshine and not enough
about sin.
Ted said: «I am
talking about their
religious values / morals / laws and how they should be kept out of our nation's legal system.»
Even if you take the
religious aspect out of it, it is still interesting those on their death bed want to
talk about family.
I'm
talking about someone who is an anti-theist and patrols
religious blogs searching out Christians to challenge their beliefs.
The kind of reasonable, sound THINKING theology and
religious / faith ideas those of us as are here
talking about, simply doesn't lend itself to a pop culture.
You are free to speak out
about you
religious beliefs or lack thereof, but this is why I don't
talk about mine.
I remember watching his science videos in elementary school but now whenever I see him on the news
talking about science it seems like he is politicizing science (when it comes to climate change) and promoting evolution as the only option to the creation of the world to try and discredit the
religious community.
I listen to how they
talk about matters of faith, religion, what they watch on their favorite
religious tv programs, often listening as well to their radios playing their favored «Christian music» radio stations in the background, what are in the lyrics.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very
religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are
talking about Atheism as a
religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
I get a kick out of the Atheist
talking about how
religious people try and ram their faith down throats... and then you see clowns like hippypoet and the prayer is not healthy kook... guess they are hypocrits just like everybody elese.
The Vatican is NOT
talking about those people who are the majority of Catholic
religious.
If the choice between fanaticisms, whether secular or
religious, is the only thing on offer, the prospects for democracy are dim and
talk about civil war may not be alarmist.
Am sick and tired of this
talk about the
religious and the non
religious things being taken as an excuse to squeeze crashing down those nations or countries... innocent peaceful people are the first to pay the price in such conflicts and wars..
It is a shame the chaplain needed to add the unnecessary
religious interpretation and spin, saying that people who
talk about family are
talking about a god.
They
talk about an attack on
religious teachings while speaking at an NRA event
about how abortion is murdering unborn children while at the same time wanting to go to war and bomb thousands of innocent men, women, children, as well as innocent pregnant women with unborn babies.
It seems that you have filled your mind to the max of things to prove to
religious people that you know what you are
talking about.
the «logic» of a
religious person: X: I think people who are dying should
talk about god, because god is totally awesome!
Nobody ever
talks about the sign in front of almost every house of worship
talking about the coming sermon, or any other form of
religious advertising — and those outnumber anything atheists do by an order of magnitude.
The Prophet Yirimiyahu -LCB- jeremiah -RCB-
talks a lot
about that
religious observances are not what is important but it is how we treat each other
You often hear
religious people
talk about «taking America back» or «restoring America».
Many
religious people I have
talked to don't even know much
about their faith, only what they are taught by rote.
Way back in 1970, before anyone was even
talking about it, Del Noce predicted gay marriage as the point upon which
religious freedom would founder.
Once he starts answering one question, he has to spend his time explaining all the questions that follow; spending time answering
religious questions takes away from
talking about issues that matter to Americans.
do I need any approval before I practice my religion, do I have to prove my religion before I practice, my holy book further describe that you must carry a gun in 21st century because there is too much crime in this world, but it doesn't say much
about if I migrate to another country these rules will still apply, Or I should modified them according to my comfort, like
talking in English which is not my
religious language wearing pants or not, having education or not, standing in line or not, I am so confused what should I do can someone help me, should I go back to country where my religion originated or back in time ask my guru questions
about western world confusion, or just decide by myself what suites me, or preach other develop country that you guys are wrong be peaceful.
For all those super
religious and not so
religious folks, it will give you something to
talk about in addition to why a huge statue was struck by lightening.
Lets vote for Romney who
talks about religious abuse and yet his religion is abusing the religion of others continually... bet he does nt suspend his money to them... they just wait till people are dead then baptise them... this is an extremist religion and not one we want for president
its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm
talking about, you assume to know what something is
about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than
religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its
about being aware of who you are?
LogicMinded: you're
talking about corruption of power, which exists for both
religious and non-
religious regimes.
We
talk about the same things you
religious folks
talk about.
These are the folks who like to
talk about «common sense» and who, as we know from research is common among the
religious, rely heavily on intuition aand believe all answers are intuitive.
«I don't see any
religious hypocrites
talking about the Bible and abortion and gays».
«Nobody seems to be
talking about the implications of having a very
religious Mormon president,» Silverman said.
I'm not
religious, what are you
talking about?
In Matthew 12:31 - 32, which
talks about the sin that will not be forgiven, it is true that some sort of denial is taking place by
religious leaders who accuse Jesus of performing His miracles by the power of the devil.
They look at the context of Matthew 12 and notice that it is the Jewish
Religious leaders Jesus was
talking to, and they did not accept Jesus as the Messiah, nor listen to the Holy Spirit's testimony
about Him.
Stephen in his blog
talks about the problem of
religious literacy.
Almost 80 percent of Americans identify themselves as Christians, with, despite all the
talk about growing
religious pluralism, no more than 5 per cent claiming other religions.