Not exact matches
From religious fervor to reasonable analysis is never the way you want the
talk about your «gee - whiz» product to progress.
The more educated one becomes the less
religious one is... when you see educated politicians and professional people of all kinds
talking religiousness it's lip service for the ignorant... it's part of their job... other wise there's trouble
from the little people.
Religious leaders free themselves
from the obligation of
talking about evil, by pretending that it's only a matter of free will and people can choose what they want and the consequences are only personal («between you and God»).
; geography and ethnicity («if he's
from Galilee, it isn't valid); government authorities (the temple police don't know what to do with him);
religious and spiritual authorities (the chief priests rule him out); legal authorities (Pharisees); and tradition or historical authority («No one's ever
talked like this before»).
Once he starts answering one question, he has to spend his time explaining all the questions that follow; spending time answering
religious questions takes away
from talking about issues that matter to Americans.
These are the folks who like to
talk about «common sense» and who, as we know
from research is common among the
religious, rely heavily on intuition aand believe all answers are intuitive.
Gyrovagues abound in
religious groups: they
talk high virtue and demand it
from everybody but themselves.
Again, we may notice that the model used to picture God in much popular
religious talk, and in some theological
talk too, was borrowed, as Whitehead noted in his Modes of Thought (Free Press, 1968, p. 49),
from «the characteristics of the touchy, vain, imperious tyrants who ruled the empires of the world.»
It's just an age - old attempt to have it both ways; people who are Christian and perceive that others will reject them for being «
religious» or «conservative» love this kind of
talk because it allows them to distance themselves
from the Christian community while still claiming to follow Christ.
This kind of mysticism abounds in all ages, in churches and in sects, and outside of any formal
religious body —
from medieval mystics to modern Quakers to contemporary college sophomores who
talk about their personal «spirituality.»
From the article,
talking about the UK — «In fact, the country is one of the less
religious ones in Europe, home to vociferous critics of religion like Richard Dawkins, and those who find belief in a higher power simply unnecessary, like Stephen Hawking.»
Agnostics (regardless of whether they lean towards being
religious or irreligious) are the only ones HUMBLE enough to admit that there is NO WAY OF KNOWING ANYTHING about an invisible man in the sky whom no one has ever
talked to, heard
from or seen... EVER!
From his inauguration as chancellor on he always
talked of Vanderbilt's «broad» or «liberal»
religious identity.
To understand this attitude we must go back to the last of his «
Talks on Judaism» in which he contrasts the false desire for security of the dogmatists of the law with the «holy insecurity» of the truly
religious man who does not divorce his action
from his intention.
I don't see any good coming
from banning
religious expressions, however I do believe we need to include ALL religions when we are
talking about
religious representation for this site.
Jeremy, I'm sure you've read Jonathan Edwards «
Religious Affection» that
talks principally about signs and whether we can conclude anything
from them.
The first admendment
talks about freedom of religion (it also protects freedom
from religion and
religious persacution)
We'll leave behind for a moment that the Christianity of our forefathers looked very different
from the Christianity of today's
Religious Right (unless you are ready to
talk about slavery, separation of Church and state, the Jefferson Bible, and Benjamin Franklin).
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon was also urged to hold
talks with his counterparts
from Nepal and Pakistan to discuss concerns raised by
religious freedoms campaigners.
It's coming
from a
religious source and not
from a bumch of people who have no idea what the heck they are
talking about.
The similarity in style and content between the stories I knew
from the Bible and the myths of other Mesopotamian cultures suddenly made those strange tales of
talking snakes and forbidden fruit and boats packed with animals seem colloquial, routine — nothing more than myths operating
from the
religious and literary conventions of the day.
But anyway,
religious folk are weak - minded and they don't realize their religion and those make - believe characters they always
talking to are what is limiting their minds
from being, you know 100 %.
I refrain
from reading comments since most commentators, especially when
talking about
religious issues, trash
talk or belittle anyone who does not agree with their opinions.
From a national population sample, the poll found that those who watch
religious television programs compared to those who don't watch
religious television programs are more likely to have had a conversion experience, to believe that the bible is free of mistakes, to believe in a personal devil, to read the bible more often, to
talk to others about their faith more often, to attend church services more frequently, and to hold to or engage in beliefs and practices characteristic of evangelicals as a whole.
And his efforts to explore these issues always began with and never strayed far
from the way
religious people actually
talk (cf. my forthcoming book Ian Ramsey: To Speak Responsibly of God).
Folks
talk about the soul as a
religious item — that it synonymous with religion — But religions don't really explain what a soul is — because they don't know — only a possible destination — Before you get all huffy, please consider where my concept comes
from — I am no longer
religious — I studied Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs for dozens of years, and determined a different design, for what the glyphs could portend — and found some interesting thought processes hidden within — including what the soul is — for instance: The Ankh symbol represents Life — the charcters for An and kh, I translate as an = thought and kh = soul — Thus Life = the thought of the soul — The soul as described by the AE, is a continuity between 2 or more enti - ties — including the enti - ty Environment — Our environment creates us — some name their environment as god — some believe there is a continuity with their environment — that is soul --
from the way you are
talking I can tell you are not a christian but a
religious person.
True story that will make you happy Wenger is in Rome attending a
religious charity football match omg
from talk sport
The driver went on and on,
talking about death and spewing harsh
religious practices at us
from the front seat (I can not recall what religion this driver hailed
from).
In them I
talked about violence, for example, the abolition of barbaric customs such as torturing people to death for
religious heresy, to reinforce the point that human nature comprises many components, some of which incline us toward violence, some of which pull us away
from it.
\ n \ nFinally I'll add that whether we're
talking about ESC, iPS, or adult stem cells it's worth repembering that the threat does not only come
from religious conservatives, animal rights activists are also campaiging to stop much of the research that underpins the whole stem cell field.
There's an undeniable wealth of storytelling to be culled
from the life of Madalyn Murray O'Hair, a
talk show regular and fighter for
religious freedom who was kidnapped in the «90s and held for ransom.
After all, in their old jobs, public - turned - Catholic - school administrators say, they felt prohibited
from talking with students about personal
religious faith.
Sandy White, an aide to a state lawmaker
from Vancouver, Wash., maintains that area high school students should not have been allowed to attend a
talk last week by the exiled Tibetan
religious and political leader.
Richard, I give you this quote
from your comment on the Christmas thread at December 29, 2012 at 10:50 am,
talking about rgbatduke: «And, as do most atheists, he fails to recognise that his religion is as faith - based as any other: agnosticism rejects faith but belief that no deity exists (i.e.atheism) is a
religious faith of identical kind to belief in the existence of one or more deities (i.e. theism).»
You'll find us
talking to people
from all places on the
religious and political spectrum, with shared passions and rewarding friendships across lines of diversity.
Your first option is to
talk to your trusted
religious leaders
from your house of worship.
Consider some students
from a Mennonite community in Manitoba
talking to a Muslim community in Vancouver, with each one making a presentation on
religious prejudice that they endure.