Figures because studies suggest we atheists have a better understanding of
religious texts then the religious.
Not exact matches
If he truly believes his
religious text as a Christian or Jew would their own
then he is doing the right thing in the eyes of god.
If there is a perfect being that created the universe and believes in interfering with our world (through Jesus, Mohammad, Buddha... whatever you believe),
then why are all
religious texts so flawed and flimsy?
If you loook to the Quran to find parts where you believe they are told to kill non believers,
then you have to look at the
religious texts of other religions as well.
All the more powerful
then are insights whose very genesis lies in those
religious texts which have throughout human history provided the symbolic landmarks for life's orientation.
in the public domain,
then I'm sure you are o.k. with the Muslim's putting up their *) everywhere they want, and the Jews putting up their «star of david» and the Buddhists, putting Buddha everywhere, and the Hindu's putting up all of their gods, and goddesses, along with all the rest of the religions of the world and their
religious imagery / symbols /
texts, etc...
if were only going to use the KJV why stop at greek, or latin why not only read the original
texts which were written in Coptic the simple fact is not a single one of us, including our highest
religious leaders, other
then about 30 ancient language specialist in the world have ever read an original scripture.
According to ancient
texts, the body was supposed to be kept under natron for 35 days, and
then kept around, exposed, for another 35 — perhaps for a period of mourning or other
religious rituals.
The highly tonal nature of the shadows that are cast across her insistent expression is
then overlaid with minute lines of Farsi
text, evoking the complex layers of intellectual and
religious forces that shape the identity of Muslim women throughout the world.
But when one contrasts the Canadian reaction to the explicit insertion of
religious views into the Republican Party and the recent book attempting to argue that the US Constitution (notwithstanding the separation doctrine) is a Christian
text because of the beliefs of the Founding Fathers —
then it becomes clear just how different the two legal cultures are.
Do I have to make sure, that if my application wouldn't even start correctly on a device, that the user is able to start the application in an impossible, absurd, magic or
religious way to ensure that he can read the legal
texts or is it enough to state it on the website
then?