every religious type use this threat to sinners as well as unbelievers.
Not exact matches
But Mr. Hayward you
use her article as a jumping off point for your own projections on how «
religious» people see you SBNR
types — liberal, educated, open minded, etc. which doesn't even come from her but from the Shambala Sun!
I think you're reading things in her article that aren't there, and
using her article to expose your own feelings about «
religious»
types.
Behaviour considered idolatrous or potentially idolatrous may include the creation of any
type of image of the deity, or of other figures of
religious significance such as prophets, saints, and clergy, the creation of images of any person or animal at all, and the
use of
religious symbols, or secular ones.
When you tell people you are questioning the creation accounts of Genesis 1 - 2, a lot of Christians get very angry, and some
religious types will actually fire you from your job... What they don't realize is that you are simply
using historical - cultural research to understand Genesis 1 - 2 the way Moses and the Israelites would have understood it.
majority of people who claim to be, «
religious,» are hypocrites and bend and twist the words of there religion to fit there own needs, and
use it as a means to an end for all
types of things.
Some as Stalin enjoy killing or
using weak
religious types for their own personal gain while others like Hitler rally Christians to a false cause.
The term could be
used of any
type of gathering, whether social, political, or
religious, and even of groups of people that never actually «gather.»
WORLD: We have to be careful not to dehumanize groups of people in monolithic stereo
types like we seem to do when we
use the words Christains or gays or atheists or
religious people.
By those
types of earthquakes, it will possible for scientists to re-discover those arcane mysteries which will be
used to discredit all fundamental
religious doctrines.
Just
type down the word «religion, jesus, god» in the CNN search box and you will find a large number of articles with pages of commentaries made by atheists
using name calling toward a small amount of
religious people compare to atheists who are posting.
«Church», I
use that word with a measure of pause every time I
type it as their
religious standing in America is also questioned and for, what seems, very good reason.
With the holidays approaching, it's the perfect time to celebrate multiculturalism and explore the different
types of
religious and cultural celebrations from around the world,
using our new assembly resource.
Here I
use five
types of schools: assigned public, magnet public, Catholic, secular private, and other
religious.
-RRB-, the main red flag waved to convince voters to reject school vouchers is that, since parents can
use the credit at any
type of educational institution, a percentage of funds will inevitably be employed towards paying tuition at private
religious schools.
As they
used to say to
religious types — don't pray for rain — pray for warm water anomalies in the right place.
OTOH when it comes to pseudo-Science, i.e. the
use of «sciency sounding» terms and phrases to pursue a
religious / social / ideological agenda, political ideology seems (to me) to make a big difference:
religious types spout creationism (including «intelligent» design) or «divine providence», socialists spout environmentalism (including «global warming»), «conservatives» seem to usually resort to mis - understood, or at least mis - applied engineering formulas, and libertarians are all over the map.
I
use the term to mean a
type of counseling which is conducted by a therapist who has been trained in both in psychotherapy and
religious studies.
The Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS)[12] is a widely
used 32 - item measure of relationship quality based on Likert -
type ratings of criteria such as agreement on activities and issues such as sex relations, philosophy of life, and
religious matters.
Other factors, such as partner
type, condom
use,
religious involvement, and school enrollment, were not predictive of infection.
Other characteristics, such as partner
type, condom
use at last sex, history of condom
use, concurrent sex partners, clinic site,
religious involvement, living in a 2 - parent household, and school enrollment, were not predictive of infection (results not shown).