I have
no religious view point as religion is not something that I subscribe to.
Not exact matches
Religious points of
view are irrelevant.
I often tell
religious folks not to limit themselves to The Bible, because like our planet being only one of many in the universe, The Bible is a limited
point of
view.
I belong to a wonderful church where we welcome (encourage) diverse
points of
view and seek to learn all we can about different
religious traditions.
It adds: «With respect to the existence and the political choices of the State of Israel, they must be seen from a
point of
view that is not in itself
religious but based on general considerations of international law.»
This theological vision is now so pervasive that judges barely recognize the Blaine Amendments as having established a distinctive
religious point of
view.
while i agree that personal
religious views shouldn't be an issue in public media coverage of a presidential candidacy, its unfortunately impossible, and at least this article
points out the good.
I do find it really interesting that from the
view point of some
religious followers even a single
point they can pick as inconsistent with their stories invalidates the entire scientific method.
The greatness and inviolability of a subject have never yet exempted those who endeavor to find expression for it from the effort of giving their very best from the artistic
point of
view; and to fail to fulfill this demand when a
religious subject of such a sublime nature as the story of Our Lord is involved, is not merely an aesthetic sin.
One could argue that this had
religious advantages from a Christian
point of
view, since it emphasized what God is doing here and now in and with us rather than locating God's action in the distant past.
This vertical connection provided the individual with autonomy, allowing him to evaluate events and relationships from the
point of
view of
religious ethics.
But we can say, for example, that a
religious, theological
point of
view can illuminate scientific research and can help to extract some coherent meaning... In the Catholic Church, we have a theology of creation whose
point of
view... gives to evolution an additional meaning which is not directly present in thescientific research, but that scientific research is coherent with this
point of
view.
Now, think from the
point of
view of a person of other
religious faith.
The conflict must continue until the secular and
religious groups arrive at a compromise which accepts the best in both
points of
view, but this will require a sustained effort to liberalize the popular concept of Islam.
Steve, you may be right that they are not necessarily incompatible, but I can't help but
point out that your
religious views are causing you to refuse to accept well - established science.
Wright notes that «Israel was thus constituted, from one
point of
view, as the people who heard God's word — in call, promise, liberation, guidance, judgment, forgiveness, further judgment, renewed liberation, and renewed promise... This is what I mean by denying that scripture can be reduced to the notion of the «record of a revelation,» in the sense of a mere writing down of earlier, and assumedly prior, «
religious experience.»
He represents a professional group which is very close to the problems of people, and he also represents a community of people who are interested in the implications of their
religious point of
view for their daily lives.
The things I find most appalling about religion reach a new zenith in Islam --(i) a dulling down of individual thought and a dogmatic requirement to conform to the
views of the masses; (ii) a stultifying ignorant education system in which anything inconsistent with the Qur» an is not just discouraged, but censored; (iii) the subjugation of women to the
point of educating them to be nothing but mindless f * king, breeding machines for their insecure husbands; (iv) a political class that feeds off the
religious - based ignorance it imposes on its populations; and (v) a general back - sliding against the rest of the planet because heads are buried in Dark Ages mythology.
The designers of the Const * itution were brilliant and knew how important it was for future generations to not
view their country as one based on Christianity, but as one based simply on freedom, and so they were very careful to put their own
religious views aside and make a strong
point with separation of church and state.
The court expressed «no
view on the merits of the cases» and
pointed out that it did not decide whether «
religious exercises has been substantially burdened, whether the government has a compelling interest, or whether the current regulations are the least restrictive means of serving that interest.»
Therefore, it is essential that there be no sexual, racial, economic or
religious barriers limiting people, because in the new creation we no longer regard each other from «a human
point of
view.»
Its
point of
view is unique among blawgs for taking seriously varied
religious traditions rather than mocking them or treating them in a lowest - common - denominator fashion.»
And perhaps it is in these vital areas that it will be most difficult to find new writers to communicate the issues from a
religious point of
view.
The result gave some indication of the numerical strength of various
religious bodies, but the amazing statistic from a long - term
point of
view is that an astounding 96 per cent of the respondents expressed a
religious preference of some kind!
Thirdly, if it did support the biblical
view of creation, it would equally support ANY
religious view of creation that has the Universe popping into existence at a discrete
point in time, including the richly diverse and inconsistent Hindu, Norse and Aboriginal Australian and Native American creation myths.
100
religious men will give you 100 different
points of
view and by no means should you let a preacher's opinion change your
point of
view.
In the final chapter it will be shown how the whole range of topics exemplify a
religious point of
view, provided religion is understood as ultimate devotion and is not restricted to the conventional sectarian sense.
I consider myself a christian, with
religious knowledge and general knowlege, however I do not hold to a set of
views dictated by an organized religion, I believe the organized religions are where we have gone wrong, as someone
pointed out earlier to most «
religious people» to question ones faith or organization is wrong but that is exactly what the bible tells us to do... test ALL things to see what is true.
But from the
point of
view of the tribes, whose
religious tradition, as the justices admitted, would be «devastated» by the government's action, there was nothing neutral about the destruction of the forest.
In the first place, and I believe that from the
point of
view of a
religious interpretation of narrative this is exceedingly important, process thinking opens the way for a new grasp of infinity or totality as a
religious concept.
How come some people on here claim to possess a logical and fact based mindset, yet can't explain their
point of
view without acting hostile and demeaning toward «
religious people».
I agree that religion ought to be taught in schools from an historical and factual standpoint and not favor any
religious point of
view.
The third trend is characterized by (1) a clearer methodological consciousness concerning the field, purpose, and method of the sociology of religion; (2) a profounder understanding of the nature of
religious communion; (3) a rapprochement between students of religion from theological and philosophical
points of
view, and of students of society.6 Outstanding are the works of Raoul de la Grasserie and H. Pinard de la Boullaye, S. J., of Roger Bastide and Robert Will.
Most
religious texts can be twisted and interpreted to serve any
point of
view, support any bigotry or tolerant
view.
Harrison S. Elliott, a pioneer in the modern approach to
religious education, once commented that «mental hygiene contributes to
religious education both a
point of
view and a methodology.»
Thus the philologist would ascertain the meaning of a passage of the Indian Atharva - Veda; the historian would assign it to a period in the cultural, political, and
religious development of the Hindu; the psychologist would concentrate on its origin and significance as an expression of feeling and thought; and the anthropologist would deal with it from a folkloristic
point of
view.
This chapter deals with religion as a particular facet of education in a democracy, but more significant is the fact that all of the preceding chapters set forth a
religious point of
view by demonstrating what the life of ultimate devotion means in a wide range of human concerns.
But I suppose it has to be dealt with in this consultation from the
point of
view of its relevance and relation to the problems raised by the threat of
Religious Communalism to the Secular Democratic character of Indian polity and the democratic struggle of the people for an egalitarian community.
Last November I
pointed out that a significant faction of the Tea Party is a subset of the
religious right and that, despite the perception of the movement being comprised of economically - oriented libertarians, the majority held social conservative
views.
Most history these days is written from a quite secular
point of
view in which the
religious foundation of culture is little Understood or appreciated.
Why could they not focus on the graduation of students without feeling the need to be intrusive and over-bearing with their
religious views to the
point that a legal case could be made against them?
I need hardly say that, from the
point of
view of any of the great
religious traditions, the single - minded pursuit of wealth controlling the University of Phoenix is profoundly wrong - headed.
Printing ushered in the Reformation and with it
religious plurality and the differentiation of consciousness reflecting competing and conflicting classes and other interests (all struggling for the right to tell stories from their own
points of
view) in the same society.
One historian summarized the
point this way: «
Religious freedom was clearly envisaged as the deliberate creation of a situation where every religious opinion and practice, having the right to free expression, would continually contend with all the others in order that error might be exposed to view and the truth be recognize
Religious freedom was clearly envisaged as the deliberate creation of a situation where every
religious opinion and practice, having the right to free expression, would continually contend with all the others in order that error might be exposed to view and the truth be recognize
religious opinion and practice, having the right to free expression, would continually contend with all the others in order that error might be exposed to
view and the truth be recognized.»
(This finiteness of
point of
view is after all a traditional
religious idea, not just a modern one.)
From a deeply
religious point of
view, and in the long run, this manner of handling the inequalities of life results in an increasing impoverishment for both the strong and the weak.
Those issues surfaced in the various briefs filed in the Supreme Court, some of which are written as if the court must inevitably choose one
religious point of
view as the winner and the other as the loser.
To set the stage for considering religion from a cosmological
point of
view, Whitehead writes, «The most general formulation of the
religious problem is the question whether the process of the temporal world passes into the formation of other actualities, bound together in an order in which novelty does not mean loss.»
In the
religious consciousness, that is just the position in which the fiend, the negative or tragic principle, is found; and for that very reason the
religious consciousness is so rich from the emotional
point of
view.
For the use of those better placed than I, whose direct or indirect task it is to lead the Church, I wish to show candidly where, in my
view, the root of the trouble lies, and how, by means of a simple readjustment at this particular, clearly localized
point, we may hope to procure a rapid and complete rebound in the
religious and Christian evolution of Mankind.