In contrast to the situation in Egypt, where even the most Western - oriented scientist I talked to at some point or other declares himself to be «a good Muslim,» in Tunisia the personal
religious views of scientists I meet hardly seem relevant.
Not exact matches
Many
of its defenders were
scientists and many
of its opponents were
religious, so it was easy to caricature the debates as a clash between the modern, rational, scientific
view and an irrational,
religious mindset.
My own
view of all
of this, as a practicing social
scientist interested in the relationship between
religious faith and empirical science, is that the general perspective taken by Evans - Pritchard, Douglas, and the Turners is not only entirely reasonable but close to the best account we might give.
In fact, some
of the most print - based
religious groups are the fundamentalists, who often
view the scriptures reverently, much the way that some
scientists view their textbooks and professional journals.
I have no problem with
religious folks but you must understand that from a
scientist point
of view, we cant trust
religious people for the simple fact that they are anti-science via their own beliefs.
They may coincide in persons who are
scientists and also believers, or in private encounters between individuals, but there is no possibility
of, or need for, a synthesis between our scientific and
religious world
views.
Whereas most
scientists seem happy to adopt a
view that «one can be «real»
scientist without being committed to any specific
religious, spiritual or anti-
religious view of the world» (p. 23), Dawkins believes that science is at war with religion, and must vanquish it.
The McGraths conclude, «Dawkins is forced to contend with the highly awkward fact that his
view that the natural sciences are an intellectual superhighway to atheism is rejected by most
scientists, irrespective
of their
religious views» (p. 21).
But
religious conservatives did not appear to be morally mollified by this technique, and even many
scientists have taken a dim
view of the experiments.
Regardless
of a
scientist's
view on their origin, they say, discovering the laws
of nature requires the same scientific methods and techniques whether the researcher is a devout
religious believer or an atheist.
In science, as in all other aspects
of life, a small percentage
of scientists would be crazy, or never change their
views regardless
of facts or devoutly
religious never accepting anything contrary to their
views and / or all
of the above.