Why not broaden the limits and meet more single people sharing the same faith and
religious views with you?
Last time I checked, the religious right regularly mixed
their religious views with their vote.
Ever notice that the people who want to share
their religious views with you almost never want you to share your religious views with them?
Perhaps I can do no more than point out the congruity of
the religious view with the findings of science.
Not exact matches
Amazon lists a number of items it restricts from its website, and there is a category for «offensive products,» which the company describes partially as «products that promote or glorify hatred, violence, racial, sexual or
religious intolerance or promote organizations
with such
views.»
«Whether the result of
religious upbringing or poor sex ed in our school systems, there are a lot of people
with a negative
view of sex.
A person's military affiliation has nothing to do
with their political,
religious, or societal
views.
If your
views of America are one of Isolationism, Hatred of Others, Intolerance of
Religious Freedoms, then You are a not inline
with the True American Ideals and you should move to Another country.
In an interview
with Mashable, Jim Jansen, a senior fellow at the Pew Internet Project, said: «There is a
view that the more tech - savvy a person is, the less
religious they tend to be.
Not among those who use «
religious faith» as a political weapon and sanctimoniously refer to themselves as the moral ones and the rest of us who do not agree
with their ignorant and distorted
view of things as immoral.
My problem
with them is that they push their beliefs on others and try to legislate their
religious based
views.
We certainly have enough Christian billboards... what's wrong
with another group expressing their
religious views?
The 1st Amendment does NOT protect you here... you have no «right» to harrass coworkers... on the job...
with your
religious view (s),
The coworkers that he was harassing
with his
religious views are the ones who should be filing a suit against him.
It adds: «
With respect to the existence and the political choices of the State of Israel, they must be seen from a point of
view that is not in itself
religious but based on general considerations of international law.»
I also know that some
religious views do not conflict
with any part of the consti.tution.
The
religious among us keep trying to chip away at the separation of church and state by making people recite the pledge of allegiance
with the God clause, installing
religious symbols and displays on public property, holding prayer breakfasts for politicians, berating the removal of prayer in public schools, trying to pass laws limiting women's access to birth control, and trying to get an amendment passed outlawing abortion (since in their
view God creates a soul the moment a sperm enters an egg).
Conservatives will never win again
with such
religious views.
you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very
religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in
with you... we are talking about Atheism as a
religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.
But if Mr. Kurtz and those who think like him had their way, the restrictions would be intolerable» at least for
religious groups advancing
views that meet
with their disapproval.
Hmmm... One might conclude, given the
religious nature of this gentleman, that quite often... «
religious» can and does (but not always) goes hand - in - hand
with «conservative» political
views... or the GOP (republicans).
However, 1) he clearly was not able to contain himself and 2) my question here is whether or not it's ok to fire someone when their
religious views conflict
with their ability to do the job their company pays them to do.
My
religious views aside... Think of how many people this church could have helped
with $ 700,000.
It will end when those minority have us praying in our own homes
with the curtains closed, no
religious items in public
view, even on our own property.
If you look at the entire
religious structure (who they believe God to be, their daily relationship
with God, who they think God was before, their
view of heaven, their
view of Jesus, etc.), traditional Christianity and Islam have a lot more in common than traditional Christianity and Mormonism.
Certainly it would be filled
with people who hold various
views, but isn't secularism itself just another form of
religious expression?
It is so much easier to find some hack to agree
with your
religious views than to bother
with facts or reality.
I do find it really interesting that from the
view point of some
religious followers even a single point they can pick as inconsistent
with their stories invalidates the entire scientific method.
Anyway, it sounds like we agree — if an organization believes (rightly or wrongly) that a person's
religious views, or lack thereof, conflict
with their objectives, they should be able to fire them.
The problem
with your list is that if we take examples such as your first one, «European Colonization of Americas», it can
viewed as a
religious cause but
with the growing trade battles at that time between European states we can say that it was a trade war that the native Americans got caught in the middle of.
its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem
with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along
with it that I have a problem
with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking about, you assume to know what something is about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your
view towards things, you really act no better than
religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its about being aware of who you are?
In sum, then, the penalty for neglecting to allow for a divine temporal freedom beyond that of God's primordial nature is to be required to grant, in effect, that the timeless and the abstract adequately describe the temporal and the concrete, even the concrete acts of divine love for individuals.2 Such a
view does not agree
with the deliverance of
religious experience.
The freer a society,
with better education, and the easier access to information and different
views is, the less
religious it will become.
If Israel
views itself as caretaker of the land — its divine mission, in Buber's
view — whose owner always makes space for those who need it (for those who choose to live
with the same inclusive spirit), the
religious precept of imitatio dei would require us as Jews to share that space, even the holy city of Jerusalem, to make it a «divine place» — the place «God intended to have made of it.»
Our task was to reformulate our liberal heritage in light of liberation thinking but also
with a
view to rethinking the relation of Christianity to the natural world and to other
religious traditions.
One could argue that this had
religious advantages from a Christian point of
view, since it emphasized what God is doing here and now in and
with us rather than locating God's action in the distant past.
This vertical connection provided the individual
with autonomy, allowing him to evaluate events and relationships from the point of
view of
religious ethics.
«Whatever issue may come before me as President, if I should be elected, on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject, I will make my decision in accordance
with these
views - in accordance
with what my conscience tells me to be in the national interest, and without regard to outside
religious pressure or dictates.»
«It is sadly becoming axiomatic among many that
religious faith is incompatible
with a scientific world
view.
But we can say, for example, that a
religious, theological point of
view can illuminate scientific research and can help to extract some coherent meaning... In the Catholic Church, we have a theology of creation whose point of
view... gives to evolution an additional meaning which is not directly present in thescientific research, but that scientific research is coherent
with this point of
view.
Similarly, people born into any given
religious faith — Christian, Muslim, Hindu, etc, etc, etc — and who are immersed in that faith, and surrounded by people of that faith, all of their lives — and especially their childhood — can't be expected to suddenly cast off such total indoctrination when an atheist such as myself presents them
with certain facts which conflict
with their world
view.
I assumed this hard - core complementarian Calvinist was just going along
with the majority, just making the easiest decisions, just bumbling along without considering the
views or experiences of other people so that his safe little
religious world would remain intact.
It alerts us to
view with some skepticism the polling data that tell us how «
religious» the American people are.
Akbar erected a special hall where
religious discussions were held
with scholars of all
views and schools.
The element of truth in this
view of the supernatural is the obvious fact that
religious experience is only possible to beings
with mental or spiritual capacities, i.e., to human beings.
JTA: Hollande Meets
With Chief Rabbi on Gay Marriage President Francois Hollande met with local religious leaders, including the country's chief rabbi, Gilles Bernheim, to hear their views on same - sex marria
With Chief Rabbi on Gay Marriage President Francois Hollande met
with local religious leaders, including the country's chief rabbi, Gilles Bernheim, to hear their views on same - sex marria
with local
religious leaders, including the country's chief rabbi, Gilles Bernheim, to hear their
views on same - sex marriages.
Jim Wallis, the progressive CEO of Sojourners, and Richard Land, the conservative head of The Ethics &
Religious Liberty Commission, are two religious scholars with opposing politic
Religious Liberty Commission, are two
religious scholars with opposing politic
religious scholars
with opposing political
views.
It is very important that they understand and support the role of the staff clergyman and not
view him
with suspicion when his
religious views are different from their own or when his goals in working
with people seem to be different from their goals.
So
with all of these people's knowledge that their
religious views are true, it confuses me.
«The challenge», wrote Father Alexander Lucie - Smith in his Catholic Herald blog shortly after the Holy Father had announced his resignation, «will be in having to watch the airwaves fill
with a whole load of people who are very marginal to Church life, and yet who will be invited to pontificate on all matters papal and
religious, giving it their own particular slant, which they will advance as a mainstream
view.»