Not exact matches
The paper has been debunked as wishful thinking and statistical failures (particularly embarrassing if you're trying to overturn statistical
evidence) that
rely heavily and uncritically on biased sources and is coated with an
irrelevant layer of political posturing.
Corroborative
evidence that goes to establishing tangential or immaterial aspects of the hearsay statement — aspects which the submitting party is not
relying on as truth — is
irrelevant when it comes to the reliability assessment.
In his reasons for overturning the acquittal, Justice Krelove stated that during the first trial «the learned Justice of the Peace erred in law by admitting and
relying upon
irrelevant and otherwise inadmissible
evidence.»