We find no merit in
the remaining arguments presented in this appeal.
Not exact matches
Carney's forceful letter to Jenkin comes the day after former Conservative leaders Lord Howard and Iain Duncan Smith launched an aggressive attack on the
Remain camp, calling out its «startling dishonesty» and the «woeful failure» of the Bank of England to
present a fair economic
argument.
Unless the
argument is that interest rates and inflation are likely to
remain low for the indefinite future, it's absurd to argue that
present levels of inflation and interest rates are relevant to setting the valuations of stocks.
Though this schema
remains, in much reduced form, in the
present volume, Hopewell found the central image, the body, unsatisfactory as a conveyance for his essentially structuralist
arguments about congregational narrative.
In keeping with Thomas Lynch, who made a similar
argument a few weeks ago in the pages of this magazine, Sarat wants to televise state killing, arguing that «the public is always
present at an execution» — the only question that
remains is whether we are willing to see what is being done in our name.
Frankfort also is conscious that he is innovating, and he states the point almost in the terms of my
present argument: «Erman... gave... a masterly but patronizing account of weird myth, doctrines, and usages, while the peculiarly religious values which these contained
remained hidden from his lucid rationalism....
Based on this information, Jantz concludes that «until definitive evidence is
presented that the
remains are not those of Amelia Earhart, the most convincing
argument is that they are hers.»
Apart from the costs there are ethical
arguments; the way nuclear power is used at
present about 1 % of the available energy in the uranium is used and the
remaining 99 % goes out with the waste.
Even if one accepts (for the sake of
argument) the preposterous claim that Corcoran did not know that Harris and his NRSP were really behind the letter, there
remains the inconvenient fact that Kelly and Corcoran did not see fit to correct the demonstrably misleading statement that the letter had been «organized» by Carter, once the true facts were
presented.
On the one hand, a permissive stance toward new
arguments by tribunals on appeal serves the interests of justice insofar as it ensures that a reviewing court is
presented with the strongest
arguments in favour of both sides... This
remains true even if those
arguments were not included in the tribunal's original reasons.