Sentences with phrase «remaining defendants»

The plaintiff dismissed our client and several other defendants from the personal injury litigation, and later obtained a multi-million dollar default judgment against the Malaysian entity as the sole remaining defendant.

Apple remains a defendant in all of the cases, and the company has shown little indication that it will back down.

Finland based Kemira is the only remaining defendant after each of the other defendants settled the claims against them; one of the settling defendants (Akzo Nobel) is domiciled in the Netherlands.

A judge granted O'Leary's motion in December, while O'Leary Funds remains a defendant.

Noting, as did Goldman, that the judge was «troubled by plaintiff's approach to this case,» Brown says time will tell whether Cox remains a defendant.

With the retrial of the six remaining defendants due to start with jury selection this week, Lenard issued an order Thursday extending the gag to cover acquitted defendant Lemorin, Lemorin's lawyer Joel DeFabio and DeFabio's «agents.»

In Wiseman v. Carleton Place Oil Inc., 2014 ONSC 1987, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice addressed the summary judgment motion brought by the two remaining Defendants in a case involving a slip and fall in a Tim Hortons parking lot.

By the trial date, BASF was the only remaining defendant.

BEHB's client, the sole remaining defendant, manufactured a roofing mastic which the plaintiff allegedly used to repair his employer's roof.

It is the first defendant to settle and agreed to help the plaintiffs with their case against the remaining defendants, which are American Airlines Group (aal), Delta Air Lines (dal) and United Continental Holdings (ual).

Now the CFPB is «terminating sanctions» against the remaining defendants, according to the agency's latest report to Congress.

He repeatedly stressed that the charges in the complaint unsealed this morning are «allegations,» though he also said that he hopes the eight remaining defendants — Todd Howe has already pleaded guilty, and is cooperating with investigators — end up going to trial, so New Yorkers «can see in gory detail what their state government has been up to.»

The remaining defendants in the Buffalo Billion case: Aiello and Gerardi, who besides the alleged Percoco bribery case also are accused in a scheme that led to their company allegedly getting awarded Syracuse - area development projects funded by the state.

The remaining defendants, also facing trial in June, are Joseph Gerardi and Steven Aiello of the Syracuse - area firm COR Development, and Alain Kaloyeros, the former president and founder of SUNY Polytechnic Institute.

Brooks and the five remaining defendants were found not guilty.

Even though Casey left the city two years ago, he remains a defendant in a civil suit accusing him and Brown of operating a «pay - to - play» scheme at City Hall.

The charges are merely accusations and all remaining defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

Instead of discussing the responses filed by the three remaining defendants to the Department of Justice's price fixing law suit, I want to talk about something else.

As each publisher settled, the remaining defendants became responsible not only for their own treble damages, but also possibly for the treble damages of the settling publishers (minus what they settled for).

The DOJ notes that «of course, the case against the remaining Defendants» — Apple and Macmillan's parent company Holtzbrinck — will continue.

Domenico and Eleanore De Sole have settled with the remaining defendants in their case regarding their purchase of a fake Mark Rothko painting from New York's Knoedler Gallery for $ 8.3 million in 2004.

Under the common law «release rule,» a settlement with one of several defendants releases the remaining defendants from liability.

The remaining defendants want to know what amounts the parties settled for.

If one of the defendants can not pay their apportioned share, the remaining defendants are required to take over payment of that defendant's share.

Two of the three remaining defendants had rejected Trans Mountains» offer to discontinue without costs and without finality.

The trial judge didn't suggest that, somehow, the agreement contained a clause that allowed the plaintiff to continue against the remaining defendant (s) for more than their own shares — their own shares would include a share based on vicarious liability, but that wasn't an issue in the case.

He indicated that he would have also reduced the damage award against the remaining defendant, Dr. Yue.

The liability of the remaining defendants was strongly contested.

Under the terms of the proposed settlement, the Remaining Defendants will pay to the Class $ 17,500,000 plus $ 164,931.50 of accrued interest in exchange for a full and final release of all claims brought in the proceeding.

On March 8, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into a settlement agreement with the remaining Defendants in this action.

The Remaining Defendants have not admitted any liability, and continue to strongly deny any wrongdoing.

Settlement reached with the Remaining Defendants — ParkLane Financial Corporation, Trafalgar Associates Limited, Trafalgar Trading Limited, and Appleby Services (Bermuda) Limited as the Trustee of the Bermuda Longtail Trust

In a summary judgement, Judge Brown dismissed all remaining defendants in the junk fax suit ruling that no state or federal laws had been broken.

Specifically, the court stated, «a Pierringer Agreement allows one or more defendants in a multi-party proceeding to settle with the plaintiff and withdraw from the litigation, leaving the remaining defendants responsible only for the loss they actually caused».

The Court of Appeal agreed with Eady J that the settlement with Vilnius did not extinguish the claimant's causes of action or that it had become an abuse of process to continue with his claim against the remaining defendants.

[1] By the time this action reached the trial stage, the only remaining Defendant was the law firm Bennett Best Burn LLP, the Plaintiff having settled with the other original defendants, Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. and G.G. Pharmacy Inc. («Shoppers»).

Five of the remaining defendants were found guilty at Southwark Crown Court on 30th January 2017, while Mr Scourfield had already pleaded guilty at an earlier hearing.

Some years later, a Master of the Court has held that where a plaintiff has settled with one defendant, the plaintiff must disclose to the remaining defendant the terms of the settlement so the remaining defendant will know the alleged real damages the plaintiff is claiming.