Not exact matches
With more money for development of novel designs and public financial support for construction — perhaps as part of a clean energy portfolio
standard that lumps in all low - carbon energy sources, not just
renewables or a carbon tax — nuclear could be one of the pillars of a three - pronged
approach to cutting greenhouse gas emissions: using less energy to do more (or energy efficiency), low - carbon power, and electric cars (as long as they are charged with electricity from clean sources, not coal burning).
While larger projects may involve engineering studies and in - depth consultation with utilities and regulatory entities, small
renewable energy projects do not normally need to be held to the same complex
standards, with aggregate net metering
approaches as a possible exception.
An important aspect of this particular project, as with all the winners, was its emphasis on the Passive House
Standard in conjunction with the use of
renewable energies — an
approach that fits with the «Nearly Zero - Energy Building» of the European Building Directive.
Though the Passive House energy certification doesn't award points for photovoltaic panels, Moskovitz cites a preference for a dual
approach of conserving as much energy as possible by following the Passive House
standard, and adding
renewable energy sources to reduce energy use from the power grid yet further.
The recent push to shift responsibility for compliance with the
Renewable Fuel
Standard (RFS), from refiners and importers to independent blenders and retail gasoline stations, is a flawed
approach that could impact consumers at the gasoline pump and does nothing to fix the larger set of problems that plague the RFS — problems Congress must address by repealing the program or significantly reforming it.
The possible components of such an
approach that would be relevant in the context of climate change include: a national
renewable electricity
standard; Federal financing for clean energy projects: energy efficiency measures (building, appliance, and industrial efficiency
standards; home retrofit subsidies; and smart grid
standards, subsidies, and dynamic pricing policies); and new Federal electricity ‑ transmission siting authority.
Captdallas — I've consistently said I oppose a «Federal»
Renewable Energy Portfolio
Standard (an example of Liberal top / down, command / control, one - size - fits - all policy
approaches like carbon taxes and cap and trade which I also have been clear I oppose).
The Clean Energy
Standard [PDF] requires two
approaches for utilities, electric companies, and other load serving entities (LSEs) to help New York meet clean energy and climate goals: meeting a
Renewable Energy
Standard through the purchase of Tier 1 RECs and a requirement to purchase zero - emissions credits (ZEC).
So contrary to current efforts to impose «
renewable energy
standards» the most economically justifiable
approach would be to adjust existing taxes on various energy sources to account for the adverse environmental effects that we know exist and allow the market to work its will.
Under the draft rule, the EPA would let states and utilities meet the new
standard with different
approaches mixing four options including energy efficiency, shifting from coal to natural gas, investing in
renewable energy and making power plant upgrades.
This speech in fact serves as a preview of an upcoming report by my colleagues and I that takes this three pillar
approach to analyze the clean energy policies of Germany, Spain and China, and makes the case that these countries are taking a comprehensive
approach towards developing their clean energy industries, whereas all the United States has is a series of patchy and heterogeneous state action (e.g. state
renewable energy
standards) or federal action that is limited in duration (e.g. short - term
renewable energy tax credits, or one - time green stimulus spending).