As an opinion columnist, I certainly
repeat arguments from time to time, and make no apology for doing so.
Do not hesitate to claim that the future is unknowable, even if it is self - contradictory; rinse and
repeat arguments from error, rejecting along the way any kind of empirical knowledge; even rebrand «knowledge» as «assumptions» and dismiss all predictions as guesses.
Not exact matches
Chesterton's Autobiography is not always a reliable source; but there is corroborating evidence for these protective feelings
from his childhood onwards: and since this evidence is virtually unknown, it is probably best here to take this opportunity to publish it for the first time (much of it will appear in my forthcoming book Chesterton and the Romance of Orthodoxy, though I discovered some of it too late for it to be included) rather than
repeat old
arguments.
I wish only to state that despite Macquarrie's fine presentation of the major themes in Heidegger's work, and despite his often engaging if not always successful
argument that those themes «can be interpreted in a way that is compatible with Christian faith,» there remains the nagging question whether a God who is thrown into the rough mix of human destiny is enough to prevent us
from repeating the horrors of the Holocaust and Hiroshima.
However, right next to thestatements quoted, we read a passage in the seventh chapter of First Corinthians that leads us to see differently Paul's teaching as a whole: «I wish that all were as I myself am, [he
repeats his favorite
argument for abstaining
from marriage]- but each has his own special gift
from God, one of one kind, and one of another» (1 Cor 7:7).
14:15 - And now we're getting a
repeat of the Yates defence
from last week - the hindsight
argument, which didn't play well then and doesn't look as if it's playing well now.
His statement echoed a new
argument made by Governor Andrew Cuomo on Wednesday, and was soon
repeated in statements (some of which used the same phrases)
from leaders in Middletown, Ulster County, Niagara Falls, Newburgh and members of the State Senate.
But they crashed into the wall of the status quo, as taxi operators
from New York City and elsewhere
repeated their
arguments that opening the door to Uber and Lyft without subjecting them to the same level of regulation could put them out of business.
And chancellor Gordon Brown yesterday
repeated his
argument that Scotland benefited economically
from being part of the UK.
They failed to convey «the degree of sophistication and intellectual rigour that is necessary to establishment of a proper position for the UK», he said, and
repeated his
argument for a phased withdrawal of troops
from Iraq.
Rodriguez
repeated de Blasio's main
argument against ponying up the money — that the MTA should use the money it already gets
from the city, taxpayers and commuter fares.
The National School Boards Association (NSBA) begins its letter by denying that school officials blame special education and private placement for draining resources
from general education and then proceed to
repeat the very
argument that they deny making.
Strawman, quote my words not what you imagine, I do not assume that — I
repeat:
From the way you have mangled my post in your replies I'm coming to the reluctant conclusion that you're either incapable of thinking to the standard required in science which is the ability to separate fact from fiction in the discipline of empirical observation and testing, or, you're deliberately distracting from the points I'm making in my argum
From the way you have mangled my post in your replies I'm coming to the reluctant conclusion that you're either incapable of thinking to the standard required in science which is the ability to separate fact
from fiction in the discipline of empirical observation and testing, or, you're deliberately distracting from the points I'm making in my argum
from fiction in the discipline of empirical observation and testing, or, you're deliberately distracting
from the points I'm making in my argum
from the points I'm making in my
argument.
Then Katherine Hayhoe visits and
repeats the same simplistic
arguments from episode 1.
Instead you continue to
repeat IPCC
arguments (like that about effective radiating altitudes rising) which are spoken about by John O'Sullivan whom I quote
from his article today...
It is not only contentious, it is not simply a matter of contention and
argument, but
from my front porch, it is simply a false statement made and
repeated by zealots.
At bottom the hypothesis is an
argument from ignorance which I have seen
repeated numerous times (see below *): Our models can not identify any natural causes for recent warming, so it must be caused by CO2.
I made the point then (and
repeat it here) that although this doesn't «disprove» global warming (the globe has warmed and during this warming we have gone
from about half a million cars to almost a billion,
from about 500 coal - fired power plants to about 23,000 — I'll let you tell me about the growth in the numbers of airplanes, washing machines and data centers...), it is a fairly straightforward
argument against high sensitivity of the atmosphere to increasing concentrations of CO2.
From Townhall: Zach Graves of the R Street Institute already eviscerated this
argument at some length, and some of his choicer passages deserve to be
repeated here: Patent reform enjoys...
10:20 am: A lot of this is a
repeat from what Google showed in its opening
arguments, but it's obviously much more powerful with Schmidt sitting there in the witness box reading his own email.