Sentences with phrase «repeatedly by analysis»

Not exact matches

This zealot's «work» has been so thoroughly, repeatedly, and authoritatively debunked by so many who have demonstrated it to be riddled with slipshod research, shoddy analysis, and downright dishonestly that I can but wonder how anyone can refer to him as an «authority» on this subject without turning red from embarrassment.

We have repeatedly observed that in nature's hierarchical structure the higher level dwells in and relies upon the lower but can not be comprehended simply by an analysis of the lower.

These uses may include providing you with more effective customer service; making the sites or services easier to use by eliminating the need for you to repeatedly enter the same information; performing research and analysis aimed at improving our products, services, and technologies; and displaying content and advertising that are customized to your interests and preferences.

Niesr's analysis will be welcome news for the opposition, which has repeatedly warned that the coalition's aggressive approach to reducing the deficit quickly has hurt growth by choking off the recovery.

The 9 mark question will develop students» key analysis and judgement skills by evaluating the overall importance of business plans to the success of a business - I have used this resource repeatedly with my classes and it has proved to work effectively at improving students» exam technique.

In Who, What, Where... the performance of the script allows a structural analysis of the mechanisms by which acts of war are repeatedly presented as inevitable political scenarios.

Invaluable research by Wolfgang Lutz and others at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria has demonstrated this repeatedly.

The core finding is that temperatures over the continents have warmed about 1 degree Centigrade (1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) since 1950, matching earlier independent analyses by American and British climate researchers that had been repeatedly attacked by climate skeptics and opponents of curbs in greenhouse emissions.

Yet, failure to do so represents a double standard, and it is also false equivalence, because «skeptical» science has been subjected to critique, it has repeatedly shown to be seriously lacking in rigor, repeatability (e.g., Loehle and McCulloch — it is impossible to compare their analysis with other reconstructions, and that is just the start of the problems), and has failed to even meet acceptable scientific standards (e.g., works by Douglass, McLane, Lindzen and Choi, Soon and Baliunas, Carter, de Freitas, McIntyre and McKitrick et cetera).

Ice core analysis by Dansgaard's group, confirmed by the Americans, showed rapid oscillations of temperature repeatedly at irregular intervals throughout the last glacial period.

Second, the analysis here also calls into question the assumption advanced via the «lawyer - judge bias» theory that judges, by virtue of being former lawyers, are inherently deficient regulators of lawyers who will inevitably favour the interests of their former colleagues at every turn.2 To the contrary, a close and careful look at judicial regulation reveals that measures taken by Canadian courts have repeatedly promoted the public interest over the interests of the profession.

Those on the pro-EU side who disagree with this analysis have to face a fact: people like Mandelson, Adair Turner, the FT, and the Economist have been repeatedly wrong in their predictions for 20 years about «EU reform», and people like me who have made the same arguments for 20 years, and called bullshit on «EU reform», have been repeatedly vindicated by actual EU Treaties, growth rates, unemployment trends, euro crises and so on.