Sentences with phrase «replace energy infrastructure»

Do you guys have any idea how hard it will be to REPLACE an energy infrastructure?

The bill would also call for an examination of the cost to replace energy infrastructure, including transmission lines.

So, what do you think the US could do to lessen the economic burden to our society for replacing our energy infrastructure by investing money to help build cleaner energy infrastructure in developing countries?

Not exact matches

Last week, Trump replaced the head of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), a five - person panel that approves certain natural gas pipeline projects and regulates interstate energy infrastruEnergy Regulatory Commission (FERC), a five - person panel that approves certain natural gas pipeline projects and regulates interstate energy infrastruenergy infrastructure.

In the emails, Clinton advisers discussed how to frame the candidate's «energy infrastructure» plan, which would call for replacing old pipelines, repairing rail tracks and improving the electric grid in a way that would appeal to labor unions, who had yet to endorse her at that stage.

It is also improving its infrastructure; at its Oakville facility, the company is replacing the roof to improve energy efficiency.

The government has shown its commitment to replacing our ageing energy infrastructure, and the Electricity Market Reform (EMR) proposals are intended to provide the economic and commercial underpinning to investments in a range of low - carbon technologies, including nuclear.

We can expect to see more inaccurate claims from Tory backbenchers about renewable power sending the cost of energy bills soaring (and failing to account for the necessary cost of replacing ageing infrastructure regardless of whether we go green).

Under the current utility structure, the power sector in New York is on track to spend an estimated $ 30 billion to replace and modernize the state's aging energy infrastructure over the next decade.

S: We should concentrate on finding a new energy resource and a new energy infrastructure to augment and ultimately replace oil, natural gas, and eventually coal.

It would be unfortunate, to put it mildly, to spend countless trillions replacing fossil - fuel energy infrastructure only to discover that its successor is also more damaging than it need be.

If this asphalt and concrete were replaced with solar cells of moderate efficiency — around 15 per cent — they would not only generate a significant amount of energy but would also provide a backbone infrastructure to deliver the energy to our doors, he says.

«About 6 percentage points of that is gained through efficiency improvements to infrastructure, but the bulk is the result of replacing current sources and uses of combustion energy with electricity.»

The inertia of energy system infrastructure, i.e., the time required to replace fossil fuel energy systems, will make it exceedingly difficult to avoid a level of atmospheric CO2 that would eventually have highly undesirable consequences.

Or the Energy Department could support the greening of school infrastructures, replacing boilers, windows and roofing, an initiative that also would generate savings against heating and cooling costs.»

Existing energy infrastructures would have to be replaced quicker and policy instruments that could make such improvements feasible would need to be adopted earlier.

In other words, replacing coal with natural gas will not have much benefit until far down the road because building extra infrastructure requires energy which is currently supplied by carbon - intensive sources.

In the interest of disclosure, I'll mention a few: One occurs if a new energy source puts carbon - based sources «out of business» and displaces them quickly, even without any cost assigned to carbon dioxide emissions: In other words, if the economic cost of the new energy source is so low that it completely and quickly beats even the lowest - cost carbon - based sources (even without a «carbon price») and justifies investments associated with replacing the associated infrastructure.

«It may be better to some extent for a rich nation to help a poor nation develop clean energy infrastructure than to replace it's own ``... includes building designs, urban planning, appliances, etc..

Reducing CO2 emissions by replacing combustion with other energy sources (solar, wind, nuclear, etc.) is a much longer - range goal that would involve rebuilding most of our industrial infrastructure.

, 545 (scale re Secular Animist), Secular Animist 542 (re Dan H. 541), — I should probably clarify that specifically what I meant was that it should tend to be more efficient to choose building a unit of clean energy infrastructure in a developing country than replace a unit of dirty energy infrastructure with said unit of clean energy infrastructure while building another new dirty energy infrastructure unit; of course those aren't the only two choices.

531 Patrick said,» It may be better to some extent for a rich nation to help a poor nation develop clean energy infrastructure than to replace it's own»

As always, energy efficiency improvements such as energy efficient lighting, adding insulation, and sealing leaks should be undertaken first.First Step: Replace Fossil Fuel Equipment Replacing building infrastructure may take some time, especially if you wait until the equipment needs rReplacing building infrastructure may take some time, especially if you wait until the equipment needs replacingreplacing.

The energy and transportation infrastructure gets replaced every 50 years or so, so upgrading it as it is replaced is a reasonable response.

Andersen: In your book, you argue that it would be impossible to transition away from fossil fuels quickly, because our current global - energy infrastructure simply can't be replaced within a single generation.

Incentives must be provided for economic development that steadily replaces outdated fossil fuel - based energy infrastructure.

Solar PV has enormous potential for replacing fossil carbon in our energy infrastructure, and its continuing exponential decline in cost makes it look like the most probable outcome.

Whereas these international tech firms are constructing infrastructure to employ clean energy, their focus isn't on fashioning solutions to lessen energy consumption, but somewhat to replace that consumption with clean energy.

Such a hybrid infrastructure would lower the use of carbon fuels for the generation of electricity, because renewable energy can replace them if there is sufficient sun or wind available.

The ability to replace not only new gas plants but also make transmission infrastructure unnecessary changes the economic threat that renewable energy represents.

Between now and 2050 China, Japan, South Korea, the ASEAN states and Australia will be investing trillions of dollars to expand, replace and upgrade the region's transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructure systems.

Fossil fuels will be replaced by other energy sources, over time, in the same way as all previous major infrastructure technology transitions have occurred.

The inertia of energy system infrastructure, i.e., the time required to replace fossil fuel energy systems, will make it exceedingly difficult to avoid a level of atmospheric CO2 that would eventually have highly undesirable consequences.

However, the government has long recognised the need for significant investment to replace the UK's aging energy infrastructure.

Fixing this also will require world - shaking investments to replace our existing energy generation and distribution infrastructure.

Twenty - first century clean energy technologies are already being designed, built, marketed, and installed to replace more than a century's worth of entrenched fossil fuel infrastructure, and a recent report by the Department of Commerce indicates that there are nearly 2 million clean energy jobs in our economy today, with more on the way.

We also look at how people can use direct investments or peer to peer lending to fund the clean energy infrastructure that needs to replace fossil fuels.

A 2010 study asked: what if the current energy infrastructure were simply allowed to live out its useful life, without being replaced?

Many politicians argue that the economic crisis, energy security issues and climate change can all be dealt with in a «New Green Deal,» replacing high - carbon infrastructure with green alternatives and simultaneously creating millions of jobs.

But if existing zero - carbon technologies can not affordably be scaled up to meet current and projected global energy needs, how likely is it that technologies either not yet invented or as yet prohibitively expensive can affordably replace the world's fossil - fuel infrastructure?

Hogan Lovells has replaced Norton Rose Fulbright on the Crown Estate's energy, minerals and infrastructure panel, with Bond Dickinson retaining its position on the roster after a competitive tender process.