Not exact matches
We lock ourselves into bad carbon behavior every time we
replace one retiring piece of
infrastructure with another that runs on
fossil fuels.
It would be unfortunate, to put it mildly, to spend countless trillions
replacing fossil -
fuel energy
infrastructure only to discover that its successor is also more damaging than it need be.
The inertia of energy system
infrastructure, i.e., the time required to
replace fossil fuel energy systems, will make it exceedingly difficult to avoid a level of atmospheric CO2 that would eventually have highly undesirable consequences.
As always, energy efficiency improvements such as energy efficient lighting, adding insulation, and sealing leaks should be undertaken first.First Step:
Replace Fossil Fuel Equipment
Replacing building infrastructure may take some time, especially if you wait until the equipment needs r
Replacing building
infrastructure may take some time, especially if you wait until the equipment needs
replacingreplacing.
The question of where we would get enough biomass to
replace fossil fuels in a sustainable way could be very tricky, as could be the question of how we build the
infrastructure required to ship all of the sequestered CO2 to sites where we can bury it cost - effectively.
What will need to be
replaced in the next 30 years are aging
fossil fuel infrastructures like outdated coal - fired power plants.
Andersen: In your book, you argue that it would be impossible to transition away from
fossil fuels quickly, because our current global - energy
infrastructure simply can't be
replaced within a single generation.
Incentives must be provided for economic development that steadily
replaces outdated
fossil fuel - based energy
infrastructure.
Fossil fuels will be
replaced by other energy sources, over time, in the same way as all previous major
infrastructure technology transitions have occurred.
Can we
replace infrastructure that relies on
fossil fuels?
The inertia of energy system
infrastructure, i.e., the time required to
replace fossil fuel energy systems, will make it exceedingly difficult to avoid a level of atmospheric CO2 that would eventually have highly undesirable consequences.
Twenty - first century clean energy technologies are already being designed, built, marketed, and installed to
replace more than a century's worth of entrenched
fossil fuel infrastructure, and a recent report by the Department of Commerce indicates that there are nearly 2 million clean energy jobs in our economy today, with more on the way.
We also look at how people can use direct investments or peer to peer lending to fund the clean energy
infrastructure that needs to
replace fossil fuels.
But if existing zero - carbon technologies can not affordably be scaled up to meet current and projected global energy needs, how likely is it that technologies either not yet invented or as yet prohibitively expensive can affordably
replace the world's
fossil -
fuel infrastructure?