Sentences with phrase «replace human lawyers»

LAW students (probably) don't need to worry about artificial intelligence getting clever enough to replace human lawyers any time soon, but technology like AI is undoubtedly revolutionizing the legal profession.

The media is more interested in talking about whether we can replace human lawyers with robots than in talking about what AI really means for law practice.

Not exact matches

As is the case with AI, the other major innovation of our age, we are still far away from a time where the technology is ready to completely replace the complex and multi-faceted roles of the human lawyer.

The platform to win the race will be the one that strips out most of the actual legal work (research, drafting, etc.) and replaces it with technology, while empowering human lawyers to focus on advising, guiding, and counseling their clients.

In case management, structured tasks such as billing and docketing have been automated, while unstructured tasks, such as monitoring junior lawyers» work and dealing with parties who fail to honour contractual obligations «require unstructured human interaction of a kind the computers can not replace.»

Presenters in all sessions encouraged us to think of the «A» in AI to mean «Augmented» and not «Artificial,» suggesting that machines will partner with, rather than replace, human lawyers to perform intelligent tasks together.

As we discussed in our recent piece «Robot, Esq.: Four Reasons Lawyers Shouldn't Fear AI and Automation Legal Tech», there are critical limitations on the ability of existing, non-general AI to replace human beings in legal practice — including the truly bespoke nature of certain tasks, the lack of sufficiently relevant and tailored data sets to train algorithms to handle even semi-bespoke tasks (given the complex cocktail of idiosyncratic considerations that good legal counsel comprises), and the non-empirical or data - driven aspects of the practice of law — involving emotional intelligence, communication, and persuasion — which I believe are core to providing effective legal services.

Mr Price stresses that e-discovery does not imply replacing lawyers as human professional skills are still needed to review the results.

My junior lawyer colleagues remind me that, for the present, there is a long way to go before AI, machine learning and other systems technology will replace the warmth and comfort of human interaction.

Plaintiff lawyers need to replace terms like: «pain and suffering» and «noneconomic damages» with terms like «human losses.»

As such, I concluded that, while technology could replace certain aspects of lawyering, the legal advice and advocacy of a trusted advisor was a decidedly human factor that was irreplaceable.

As machines become more intelligent it is inevitable that the machine will move up the legal vertical and do more replacing of human lawyers than supporting.

Technically, nothing even stops nations from replacing central banks with algorithms (no, lawyers will still be human).

Likewise, legal structure — long dominated by the pyramidal, profit - per - partner (PPP) model — is being replaced by a flat corporate structure where lawyers are but one of many resources — human and technological — deployed to solve business challenges that raise legal issues.