The fact that it is so easy to fix is encouraging, because it means users can, and hopefully will, repair rather than
replace if something breaks.
Not exact matches
And
if we
broke something, our insurance policy wouldn't cover it — how do you
replace priceless?
So
if a child was not careful and lost or
broke something, he will be asked how he will work to
replace it, without making him feel bad about what he did.
This will help them realise the practical monetary value of the toy, as opposed to a vague idea that it's just
something mom or dad will
replace in a flash
if broken or misused.
Okay, so it's acceptable to
break certain rules we've come to expect from vampires and werewolves (for instance Blade), but only
if you
replace it with
something just as cool.
If something happens to wear out or
break down completely, we can find the right part you need to fix or
replace it and take care of it right here at our service department.
When you buy
something that comes with a lifetime warranty, it means
if it
breaks down, you can get it
replaced for as long as you live, right?
This could be financial fear (of not having the means to
replace something if it
breaks, or feeling guilty for having spent so much), fear of litigation, of not being able to find
something, or of missing out.
Are we really going to invent
something which costs tens
if not 100s of millions of pounds in order to
replace something when it isn't
broke?
You probably
replace something when it
breaks down and no longer works (or repair it
if the costs aren't too high).
As for the transition,
if they did anything, I think they should STOP broadcasting analog shows and
replace them with a scroll that says
something like, «Your TV is NOT
broken!
If your necklace ever
breaks due to reasons beyond our control (toddler yanked it, it caught on
something) we will be happy to
replace your chain free of charge!