Goals like these are especially notable to the extent that they would supplant even natural gas, which is abundant, cheap, flexible and widely used to
replace old coal plants as they become uneconomic and shut down.
The second is to
replace older coal plant and displace new coal builds with something much cleaner.
Not exact matches
Ultimately, the replacement of
old, highly polluting
coal - fired power
plants by nuclear reactors is essentially no different from deciding, after putting sentimental considerations aside, to
replace your inexpensive and reliable — but obsolete — 1983 Olds Omega with a 2007 Toyota Camry or BMW 3 Series sedan.
Does it makes sense to
replace old coal - fired power
plants with new natural gas power
plants today, as a bridge to a longer - term transition toward near zero - emission energy generation technologies such as solar, wind, or nuclear power?
Replacing old coal - fired power
plants with new natural gas
plants could cause climate damage to increase over the next decades, unless their methane leakage rates are very low and the new power
plants are very efficient.
The study also found that, although transmitting
coal power was slightly more effective at reducing air pollution impacts than simply
replacing old coal power
plants with newer, cleaner ones in the east, both
coal scenarios had approximately the same carbon emissions.
The best policy is to
replace the
oldest dirtiest most inefficient
plants with newer
plants (not «clean»
coal, but cleaner
coal).
Older, dirtier
coal plants need to get
replaced with cleaner wind or solar or nuclear
plants, say.
There is no doubt that the global
coal fleet is changing as
older inefficient subcritical stations built decades ago in Europe and the US are being
replaced by new, highly efficient
plants in emerging economies like China, South and South - east Asia.
Some of these new
plants are
replacing old ones, but overall, the German Energy Agency projects
coal capacity will climb.
Some countries in ASEAN, particularly Thailand, have been embarking on CCTs by retiring their
old conventional
coal power
plants and
replacing them with ultra-supercritical
coal power
plants.
Climate targets mean
older inefficient
coal plants will have to be phased out or
replaced with new ones equipped with carbon capture and storage, the IEA says.
Action is being taken on this now with the government recently announcing plans to close
old, inefficient
coal fuelled power
plants and
replace them with modern high efficiency technology.
BNEF expects the nation's
coal - power capacity in 2040 will be about half of what it is now after
older plants come offline and are
replaced by cheaper and less - polluting sources such as gas and renewables.
The reason: Since 2012, carbon pollution from the states» traditionally
coal - heavy power sectors has dropped significantly, as new gas power
plants have
replaced older, less efficient
coal plants.
On the other hand, it is reasonable to assume that natural market factors will gradually result in a reduction of ever more expensive fossil fuel combustion as
older coal - fired power
plants are shut down and
replaced by nuclear
plants, as hybrid and electrical cars gradually
replace gasoline and diesel driven ones, and as energy efficiency is improved and waste reduced.
Considering that America has 22.1 percent of the world's proven
coal reserves, the greatest of any country and enough to last for 381 years at current consumption rates, it is a tragedy that the U.S. can no longer build new, clean,
coal - fired power stations to
replace its aging fleet of
coal plants.Supercritical power
plants operate at very high temperatures and pressures, resulting in significantly greater efficiencies than
older technologies.
The new
coal plants (per the German government) have been long planned to
replace very
old and low efficiency units with new
coal units which are approaching ~ 50 % efficiency.
As we see
older, inefficient
coal plants replaced in Europe and the US by new, highly efficient ones in emerging economies like China, Southeast Asia and India, this issue looks at an array of energy trends and what they mean for these economies.
But this time, instead of blocking construction of new
plants, the strategy will be to figure out which are the nations
oldest and worst - pollution
coal power
plants, get them shut down, and
replace them with renewable energy.
Although the new
plants will benefit from modern pollution control technologies and will
replace older plants without such advantages, the root of the problem remains: brown
coal, or lignite.
If we are going to effectively reduce air pollution and address global warming, we need to shut down the
oldest, dirtiest
coal plants — and not build new ones to
replace them.
The scheme was one of two emergency schemes first introduced last year to help cope with Britain's tightening power margins, as
old coal plants are closed down and not
replaced.
«By
replacing decades -
old coal plants with homegrown, clean and affordable energy sources, AEP can do right by affected workers and their families, and continue clean energy job creation across Indiana and Ohio.»
Here's a thought: instead of focussing on burying millions of tons of emitted carbon, how about retiring
old coal fired
plants and
replacing them with renewable energy, and using the billions of R&D dollars for CCS to support clean and green renewable energy projects across the country?