I would agree 100 % that building nuclear power plants using today's best technology to cover a majority of future electrical energy needs or to
replace old fossil fuel plants that are being decommissioned anyway makes sense.
Not exact matches
With new, eco-friendly technologies waiting to
replace old - school nuclear or
fossil - fuel turbines like this one, the energy industry is going to drastically change... eventually.
Replacing old slowly growing forest by young rapidly growing one is useful only if the
old trees are either stored so that they will not release their carbon back to atmosphere or used to
replace fossil fuels or materials, whose manufacturing causes CO2 emissions.
On the other hand, it is reasonable to assume that natural market factors will gradually result in a reduction of ever more expensive
fossil fuel combustion as
older coal - fired power plants are shut down and
replaced by nuclear plants, as hybrid and electrical cars gradually
replace gasoline and diesel driven ones, and as energy efficiency is improved and waste reduced.
But obviously this is not the case as you can clearly see based on the fact that greenhouse emissions from other sources are many orders of magnitudes higher than from PV, even if you take
old data and produce PV in large number on
old inefficient equipment and do ignore the simple fact that PV electricity production
replaces fossil fuel based electricity production!
With that in mind, they are looking to come up with a separate design that would blend in better with
older buildings, but they also hope that more people will change their minds and realize that buildings and design can evolve, especially in order to
replace fossil fuels with solar power.
In each case new
fossil fuels
replaced old solar based systems.