Sentences with phrase «replay attack protection»

You need to be saying, «No I am the «true bitcoin» I'm going to defeat you — You should implement replay attack protection against me.»
A public notice issued by them last week revealed that the cryptocurrency exchange has not yet zeroed on any specific date and time for distribution of the new token as the same is contingent upon garnering stable miner hashpower, sufficient replay attack protection and adequate protection from vulnerabilities.
HONG KONG — 23 OCTOBER 2017 — Gatecoin will not be supporting the upcoming SegWit2x (B2X) hard fork in November due to the lack of two - way transaction replay attack protection coded into this proposed software «upgrade.»
The Poloniex team agrees that any contentious hard fork must include replay attack protection.
Those who are against Segwit2x believe if the developers do not implement replay attack protection a malicious actor or group can replay transactions deceptively claiming coins on the other chain.
In a public notice last week, the exchange revealed it hadn't determined a specific date and time for distributing the new cryptocurrency, contingent on determining if the new token has sufficient replay attack protection, a stable miner hashpower and adequate protection from vulnerabilities.
One of the biggest controversies about the fork is the lack of replay attack protection, and bitcoin proponents have been quarreling about this issue for quite some time.
Over the past few months, Core developers and supporters have been vehemently against the block size increase but are also upset that the Segwit2x working group will not add replay attack protection.
In the case with the August 1st Bitcoin Cash hard fork, developers had implemented replay attack protection to avoid this problem.
Additionally, unlike the website's claims, there is no replay attack protection added to the protocol, even though the team is adamantly against Segwit2x not adding replay protection.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z