Sentences with phrase «replay protection»

"Replay protection" is a security measure to prevent someone from using or repeating the same action multiple times. It ensures that certain actions or transactions can happen only once and cannot be duplicated or replayed again. Full definition
Unfortunately, any strong replay protection scheme requires a hard fork.
This is causing some anxiety as many believe this lack of replay protection will cause all sorts of horrible things on the network.
Firstly, we appreciate that they implemented replay protection to protect innocent users and businesses from accidentally losing money.
The bitcoin gold development team has announced that it is adding support for two - way replay protection ahead of the network's expected launch.
As such, a strong replay protection scheme looks unlikely going forward.
But these are generally also the types of users that would be able to split their coins even without replay protection.
However, without implementing full replay protection their efforts were bound to put an immense pressure on the legacy ledger.
Not all Bitcoin splits come with replay protection, but this one did.
This is called «strong» replay protection because there is no way for anyone to accidentally be exposed to replay attacks.
One of the critics to this fork is that it does not support replay protection.
The bitcoin gold development team has announced that it is adding support for two - way replay protection ahead of the networks expected launch.
Following the community feedback, we are now exploring different replay protection addition to the fork to avoid network instability.
The announcement of replay protection comes before bitcoin gold is available to users.
We'll bring back transactions when it's safe either because there is one chain or funds are protected by our own replay protection.
It has built - in replay protection along with its own unique address format.
Unfortunately, most replay protection schemes are hard forks.
Average users, if they are even aware of what's going on, would probably find it much more difficult to utilize optional replay protection.
We opted for strong replay protection and a difficulty reset, to make the coin as usable as possible.
However, without replay protection, that doubling could cost users big time.
Strong two - way replay protection, enabled by default, such that transactions on each chain are invalid on the other chain.
One of the critics to this fork is that it does not support replay protection.
QuadrigaCX did sign the hard fork statement insisting on consensus and strong replay protection for hard forks, originally referring to the potential Bitcoin Unlimited hard fork.
So, if Bitcoin Core added replay protection in the short time span for the Segwit2x hard fork (3 months), this would most likely create three different ledgers: Segwit2x, Bitcoin with Replay and Bitcoin Legacy.
The Bitcoin Gold team are trying to include replay protection in its protocol and is seeking a developer to write this code.
But what we know is that the SegWit2x chain may not include replay protection.
1st Nov: the Bitcoin Gold blockchain is activated (if replay protection is implemented), and users can claim their BGold.
Headed up by Jeff Garzik, the lead developer behind the failed SegWit2x hard fork, along with Matthew Roszak and SongXiu Hua, this UnitedBitcoin (UB) hard fork will offer replay protection to prevent people from accidentally spending their coins on both the Bitcoin and the UnitedBitcoin blockchains.
Instead, since many Bitcoin Core developers feel that 3 months is too short to prepare for a hard fork, replay protection on Bitcoin Core is a non-starter.
«Maybe people like to get «free» coins, but they are misleaded (sic), they can lose everything, and there are some more vicious side effects, like replay protection collisions between forks.»
BU will not be listed or used as a deposit / withdrawal currency until replay protection is implemented and BU is not at risk of a blockchain reorganization if the Core chain becomes longer.
Meanwhile, some fear the big block version of bitcoin will fail to contain adequate technical measures (known as replay protection) to ensure transactions on both chains don't become muddled.
Segwit2x, on the other hand, has refused to implement replay protection by default, which unnecessarily puts the whole ecosystem at risk and imposes undue burdens on all cryptocurrency businesses.
Preston: [00:34:50] So when we go to November and we're talking about this 2x hardfork they're not putting replay protection in it correct.
Moreover, Trezor also highlights that the bitcoin gold developers have not added replay protection yet, which is an issue for a lot of service providers.
Due to weak replay protection by the BCG team, traders, and investors have opted out to distribute their funds across many altcoins and digital assets.
Strong 2 - way replay protection means that transactions from chain X are never valid on chain Y after the hard fork and vice-versa.
In its statement, 2x's lack of replay protection formed the basis of TREZOR's chosen plan of action, the feature having gained widespread condemnation across the Bitcoin community including pioneer Nick Szabo.
«As stated publicly, we are generally against any hard forks; we do not currently guarantee that we will handle SegWit2x, or that we will list it; as far as I know replay protection is still a concern.»
Other changes include: New Transaction Signatures — A new SigHash type provides replay protection, improved hardware wallet security, and elimination of the quadratic hashing problem.
The second major concern was that Bitcoin Gold does not have an inbuilt replay protection.
Currently, the B2X chain does not have replay protection built in.
SegWit2x does not include strong transaction replay protection, nor does it have widespread consensus across the community.
If there was more time to prepare for the hardfork then replay protection could have been built in.
Replay protection schemes are themselves hardforks and implementing any sort of replay protection now will result in three different blockchains.
Bitcoin Core (BTC's original chain) could have implemented replay protection ages ago and made all future forks powerless, but they chose not to do this for some reason.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z