Sentences with phrase «report as alarmist»

Climate - skeptic organizations assailed the new report as alarmist even before it was published.

The energy industry — oil, natural gas, and coal producers — will undoubtedly dismiss the report as alarmist.

Not exact matches

So the alarmist community has reacted predictably by issuing ever more apocalyptic statements, like the federal report» Global Change Impacts in the United States» issued last week which predicts more frequent heat waves, rising water temperatures, more wildfires, rising disease levels, and rising sea levels — headlined, in a paper I read, as «Getting Warmer.»

Perhaps as expected, some of the pro-Conservative media was quick to report the manifesto's potential implications in a typically alarmist manner.

The first wave of reporting about the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) listing of processed meats as carcinogens, and red meat as a probable carcinogen, was predictably simplistic and alarmist.

Sure it's a short time period, but nothing in any alarmist prediction or IPCC report hinted that there was any possibility that for even so short a time as 15 years warming might cease (at least not in the last IPCC report, which I have read nearly every page of).

It appears to me that they're on the defense after Climategate, and appear to be taking some great liberties with the way good science is done, as evidenced by some of the alarmist reports and articles we see.

«If the United Nations and fellow climate alarmists get their way on restricting carbon dioxide, the poor will soon be getting poorer — much, much poorer — especially in places such as Africa, Latin America, and large swaths of Asia,» The New American's Alex Newman reported in a 2013 article entitled UN Carbon Regime Would Devastate Humanity,

This divergence in the alarmist camp is now going to create a dilemma for all those liberal media outlets — from the BBC to the Guardian to the LA Times — which reported on NOAA's «death of the pause» study as if it were a reliable and credible thing.

The «Glaciergate» story, as it has come to be called, was caused by the report contending that Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035, a date that is now found to have been alarmist and erroneous.

The US alone spends $ 7 billion each year on warming «studies», which is, in truth, nothing but a huge money laundering operation, as no real science is conducted and vapid alarmist reports the only product generated.

«It would be ironic indeed if the skeptical Trump Administration were to simply issue this alarmist report as federal policy on climate change science.

Writing at Townhall, Wojick calls for a «Red Team critique» of the upcoming Climate Science Special Report (CSSR), which Wojick describes as «an extremely alarmist rendition of what is supposedly happening with Earth's climate.»

As we've seen over the last couple of years, many of the more outlandish and alarmist claims in the IPCC reports have been based not on peer - reviewed science, but on «grey literature» — the propaganda sheets and press releases distributed by fanatical green NGOs (many of which are part - funded by the European Commission — but that's another story).

As discussed last week, several reports have shown in the last year or two that carbon dioxide (CO2) does not significantly affect global temperatures, contrary to endless repetitions to the contrary by climate alarmists and the mainstream press.

Yet Meacham, quoting none of this, simply brushes aside the 1975 report as «alarmist» and «discredited.»

Meanwhile, the NOAA report shows that climate alarmists (and NOAA belongs in this category) are still, as the Climategate emails revealed very clearly, willing to lie with statistics to get the warming the models predict.

Numerous attempts (such as the very carefully researched NIPCC reports) to point out the inconsistencies between the CIC fantasy science world and the real world have not always convinced the alarmists, however, perhaps because the public finds the technical discussion of the many areas of science involved too difficult.

As the actual climate truths and realities are finally being reported by the world's press (Der Spiegel, The Financial Times, etc.), the UN's global warming chief alarmist continues with delusional denial.

For example, I reported that Trump apparently plans to eliminate all climate change research conducted by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) as part of his fight against climate alarmist policies.

But the satellite data had two effects: (a) it constrained the amount of global warming which e.g. HadCRU and GISS could report since 1979, and (b) as 30 years and more of satellite data were obtained the alarmists lost ability to refute the validity of the satellite data.

Likewise, the MSM alarmist choir has almost totally ignored Howarth's ties to funding from the radical Park Foundation, as exposed last year in a report by the Republican minority of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee entitled, «The Chain of Environmental Command: How a Club of Billionaires and Their Foundations Control the Environmental Movement and Obama's EPA.»

In almost every alarmist report about global warming (or «climate change» as it is currently called since the earth has been cooling) they conveniently avoid mentioning the most significant influence of the earth's temperature, The Sun.

As a result of our recent Global Science Report on global warming ruining our bananas, one of our fans directed our attention to an important effect of climate change that we somehow missed, back in 2008, when the alarmists at the BBC wrote that it was threatening haggis.

«The alarmists and media have been frustrated in their efforts to report global warming evidence as nature has refused to cooperate.

As I see it if anyone is actually crazy enough to actually believe that then a few «alarmist» headlines aren't to blame, nor would it make any difference if the media started reporting climate change in a more «moderate» way — this kind of attitude comes from a deep rooted idealogical opposition to government action and environmentalism.

Of course there's the scandal that just broke regarding the «gold standard of peer reviewed science» that climate alarmists always reference, who's data is used as the basis for many other climate studies, as well as IPCC reports, and even US EPA guidelines - The Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, UK.

I don't think that it's «alarmist» to be alarmed about events in the Yamal when seen in this new martian context — Siberian news reports last year described mapping of 7000 methane - venting mounds across the Yamal - Gydan (The Siberian Times, 27/03/2017), a number far in excess of the global frost mound population (~ 5000 [Mackay, 1998]-RRB- as of 1998.

According to reporting by The Hill, as the new president of Heartland, Huelskamp would continue «pushing for eliminating Environmental Protection Agency regulations and challenging «climate change alarmists» like former President Obama and former Vice President Al Gore; advocate for school choice and voucher programs; and offer assistance to states navigating ObamaCare and the current healthcare fight.»