Sentences with phrase «report authors cite»

Truth is data on real estate developers, speculators and flippers is sparse, but, as the report authors cite, «there is a creeping sense that, even in just the past 6 - to - 12 months, speculation is starting to pick up.»

Not exact matches

The end - to - end manufacturing hype ignores 3D printing's cost and speed limitations says Duncan Stewart, Head of Technology, Media and Telecommunications (TMT) Research at Deloitte Canada, and author of the consulting firm's much - cited annual TMT Predictions report.

Ashish Jha, the senior author of the JAMA Internal Medicine paper, points out in a blog post that there are reasons why women doctors might well deliver better care, citing research to suggest that they might adhere more closely to established clinical practice guidelines and that patients often report better personal experiences (something that ultimately might lead to better outcomes).

«Citing Census data on male and female commutes to work, the authors partly attributed these disadvantageous geographic patterns to female entrepreneurs» desire to live closer to their businesses, perhaps because they do the lion's share of the work at home,» reports the WSJ.

The authors admit that they can not determine the source of the mercury cited in the report.

In the Assembly, Lancman authored the Safe Patient Handling Act (A. 1370B / S.2470 B) as well as a report on the subject, authored the Health Care Workplace Violence Prevention Act (A. 4856), and helped ensure safe working conditions at St. Barnabas hospital in the Bronx, which was cited by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for inadequately protecting employees from violence.

To cite one example: in a study published in 2008 by Karpicke and his mentor, Henry Roediger III of Washington University, the authors reported that students who quizzed themselves on vocabulary terms remembered 80 percent of the words later on, whereas students who studied the words by repeatedly reading them over remembered only about a third of the words.

We will demonstrate this here with no intent to discredit the particular authors or to dispute the importance of the reported phenomena in the cited articles.

Last year, the soil science community was rocked by reports that an editor, Artemi Cerdà, was accused of citation stacking — asking authors to cite particular papers — boosting his profile, and that of journals where he worked.

Report author, Dr Ben Alcott, said: «When people speak of a positive school experience, they frequently cite a personal relationship with a teacher and the encouragement they were given.

Even the authors no longer had a copy of the paper, and none of the researchers who cited the study was able or willing to produce the report after numerous requests.

Even though there is already a large body of research, the authors do not cite any existing independent research or reports.

Report author and University of Missouri economics professor Cory Koedel, cites a survey that finds, when asked to rate their teachers on a ten - point scale, school principals gave more than 70 percent of their teaching staff an «8» or higher.

Traditional publishers have long issued quarterly sales reports to their authors, often distributed three months after the fact, and that's one of the many reasons authors cite for trying to go it alone.

Further, both Porter and I have cited the amazing work being done by Hugh Howey and Data Guy and their quarterly Author Earnings reports.

This article criticizes the decision made by site - based management teams at Michigan elementary schools to cut school librarian positions and cites an impact study conducted by the Library Research Service, as well as a report authored by the National Center for Education Statistics.

Further, these news reports are being cited as the reason why authors fail to build a successful career on Amazon and the other ebook retailers.

While the question of using ISBNs — the International Standard Book Number — remains controversial among some self - publishing authors, the report released late Tuesday (September 7) from ProQuest's Bowker cites a growth rate of 21 percent in ISBN registration by self - publishing authors between 2014 and 2015.

This report is the sole property of the author and may not be reproduced, distributed, reprinted, cited, or used in any way without prior written consent from the author.

I've been unable to locate any national figures for PEP from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the examples the authors cite (shown in orange on the map below, adapted from [7]-RRB- nearly all come from the mid-Atlantic and Southeast, where reports of raccoon rabies have risen sharply since the mid-1970s and «the importation of rabid raccoons from Florida by hunters.»

And the CDC report cited by Gerhold and Jessup provides additional context the authors ignore — including the «news» that there were no bites at all:

Citing «a lack of communication and transparency» and «weak responses and inaction,» cultural heritage adviser David Zivie, who authored the report, advised the government to create a cultural heritage task force to oversee restitution cases.

As for lead authors reviewing / citing their own work... the IPCC's got it covered in their package of «reforms» in response to the InterAcademy Council review: The task group on Conflict of Interest took a leaf from the Muir Russell report and tapped into the «team - work» side - step.

They cite the NAS report as supporting such field tests, but one of its authors, Ray Pierrehumbert explained that the report first calls for some sort of regulatory process to be put in place:

I put it to Myles Allen — who seems, along with Gabi Hegerl, to be the lead author of Chapter 10 primarily responsible for the sections relating to climate sensitivity — that in view of these serious statistical errors, results from the affected papers should not be cited in the IPCC report.

The report claims to be «independent», yet its authors constantly cite their own work, that of other contributors, and frequently quote each other.

He built his presentation around the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's fifth assessment report, published in 2013, which has more than 800 authors and cites more than 9,200 scientific papers (he also rewatched An Inconvenient Truth).

The NRDC roundly criticized the authors» «fuzzy» and unsubstantiated assertions, citing numerous counter examples of the so - called «rebound» effect and the range of energy - efficient techniques that are resulting in less illumination and energy use, not more, while Think Progress dug into the reports cited to find the conclusions were neither what the authors presented, nor as definitive as suggested.

We analysed the references cited in Chapter 3 of the Working Group 1 2007 report and compared the authors of each of the papers to the IPCC authors involved in writing Chapter 3.

If you can't understand what the author of a review is saying or if you disagree with conclusions, you should start reading the original cited studies upon which a review, such as the IPCC reports is based.

He cites the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as the authoritative body, which is not surprising because he was a lead author for the (IPCC) Reports for 1990, 1992, 1995, a Coordinating Lead Author and panel member of the 2001 Report and a Review Editor for Chapter 3 of the 2007 Rauthor for the (IPCC) Reports for 1990, 1992, 1995, a Coordinating Lead Author and panel member of the 2001 Report and a Review Editor for Chapter 3 of the 2007 RAuthor and panel member of the 2001 Report and a Review Editor for Chapter 3 of the 2007 Report.

This report, which helped foster the type of interdisciplinary communication the authors recommend, cites many of the same villains we've come to learn about over the last few years, including nanotechnology, geo - engineering and genetic engineering.

of the top 500 most cited authors in the larger list, just 23 (4.6 %) have signed any climate skeptic declaration, while 184 (37 %)-- nearly ten times as many — have signed an «activist» statement (aside from the IPCC reports themselves.)

TRAFFIC and the partner organizations that authored the report will present their findings at the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), held just before the COP 15.

Drafts, review comments, and author responses are pre ‐ decisional materials that are confidential until publication of the final Report or Technical Paper; they are not the results of the assessment and may not be cited, quoted, or distributed as such1.

As most readers will know, with works of «criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research,» to use the example of the U.S. legal system, authors can in the name of fair use reasonably cite others» published work without violating copyright.

Anybody can see the point: the author uses the neutral citation instead or in addition to a proprietary citation, anybody will find the cited case in her favorite database (commercial or not) or in a printed report series.

However, for both child abuse and parent stress, the average effect sizes were not different from zero, suggesting a lack of evidence for effects in these areas.108 Earlier meta - analytic reviews have also noted the lack of sizable effects in preventing child maltreatment — again citing the different intensity of surveillance of families in the treatment versus control groups as an explanation (though the authors did report that home visiting was associated with an approximately 25 percent reduction in the rate of childhood injuries).109 Another review focusing on the quality of the home environment also found evidence for a significant overall effect of home - visiting programs.110 More recently, Harriet MacMillan and colleagues published a review of interventions to prevent child maltreatment, and identified the Nurse - Family Partnership and Early Start programs as the most effective with regard to preventing maltreatment and childhood injuries.

The MDR has good convergent validity with widely used self - report measures of marital conflict and marital relations (author cite).