The IPCC's Working Group II
report on climate risks and impacts acknowledged the limitations of biofuels (ClimateWire, March 31).
Retail and oil and gas companies performed particularly strongly, with 67 percent and 65 percent of the largest companies in each sector
reporting on climate risks.
The panel is charged by the United Nations with reviewing research to create periodic
reports on climate risks, documents that are often used by governments to guide decisions, and its every conclusion is being dissected under a microscope.
Not exact matches
Governments can manage
climate change but will have to cut greenhouse gases to zero by 2100 to limit
risks a U.N.
report said
on Sunday.
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or
climate change affecting the operations of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market
risks that may affect the Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly
reports on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports&r
reports on Form 10 - Q (the «
Reports&r
Reports»).
The
report shows how investors continue to seek accountability
on climate change
risk and corporate political spending, but have growing concerns regarding the treatment of women.
Others
on climate change, energy and related
risks — as well as sustainability
reporting on strategy and performance — account for almost another 40 percent of all resolutions, roughly the same as the previous year.
«This
report shows how fund managers, the experts
on whom millions of savers rely, see the
climate - related
risks to share prices,» said UKSIF chief executive Simon Howard.
In its next two Group annual
reports, HSBC will give more details
on its approach to
climate - related
risks and opportunities
A small but growing number of countries now have legal requirements for institutional investors to
report on how their investment policies and performance are affected by environmental factors, including South Africa and, prospectively, the EU.36 Concern about the
risks of a «carbon bubble» — that highly valued fossil fuel assets and investments could be devalued or «stranded» under future, more stringent
climate policies — prompted G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2015 to ask the Financial Stability Board in Basel to convene an inquiry into how the financial sector can take account of
climate - related issues.37
Since 2010, two large investors have been trying to get Smucker's to work
on substantive and meaningful annual sustainability
reporting and address
risks associated with
climate change, with marginal success.
The UK
Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017 evidence report, prepared for the UK Government by the the Committee on Climate Change, identifies where more effort is necessary, and urgent, to address the risks of climate
Climate Change
Risk Assessment 2017 evidence
report, prepared for the UK Government by the the Committee
on Climate Change, identifies where more effort is necessary, and urgent, to address the risks of climate
Climate Change, identifies where more effort is necessary, and urgent, to address the
risks of
climate climate change.
The AAAS Center for Public Engagement convened a panel of experts to develop and disseminate a
report on the realities,
risks, and responses to
climate change.
Landrum and her colleagues demonstrated the effect experimentally and
reported the results in a 2017 paper in the Journal of
Risk Research entitled «Culturally Antagonistic Memes and the Zika Virus: An Experimental Test,» in which participants read a news story
on Zika public health
risks that was linked to either
climate change or immigration.
The
report, called «What We Know,» marks the kickoff of a new AAAS initiative to increase dialogue
on the
risks of
climate change.
«Until recently, only West Antarctica was considered unstable, but now we know that its ten times bigger counterpart in the East might also be at
risk,» says Levermann, who is head of PIK's research area Global Adaptation Strategies and a lead - author of the sea - level change chapter of the most recent scientific assessment
report by the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, IPCC.
The Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) was set up in 1988 by the UN to
report on the
risks of global warming.
The IPCC wants world leaders to err
on the side of caution in preparing their citizens for extreme weather events that will likely become more frequent; earlier this year they released a
report entitled «Managing the
Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance
Climate Change Adaptation» to help policymakers do just that.
R. S. Sharma, a public health specialist
on the panel from the Indian Council of Medical Research, writes in the
report that, «the hot tropical
climate of the country, the low body mass index; low fat content of an average Indian as compared to European countries and high environmental concentration of radio frequency radiation may place Indians under
risk of radio frequency radiation adverse effect.»
Their work resulted in the IPCC's Fifth Assessment
Report and Special
Report on Managing the
Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance
Climate Change Adaptation.
Bill Hare, who leads a group of top
climate scientists and economists at Berlin - based Climate Analytics who helped produce the UNEP gap report, said Geden's accusations «could not be more wrong» and lumped the researcher in with climate skeptics and other naysayers «who systematically downplay the risks of climate change and argue against action to reduce emissions on spurious and ill - founded grounds.
climate scientists and economists at Berlin - based
Climate Analytics who helped produce the UNEP gap report, said Geden's accusations «could not be more wrong» and lumped the researcher in with climate skeptics and other naysayers «who systematically downplay the risks of climate change and argue against action to reduce emissions on spurious and ill - founded grounds.
Climate Analytics who helped produce the UNEP gap
report, said Geden's accusations «could not be more wrong» and lumped the researcher in with
climate skeptics and other naysayers «who systematically downplay the risks of climate change and argue against action to reduce emissions on spurious and ill - founded grounds.
climate skeptics and other naysayers «who systematically downplay the
risks of
climate change and argue against action to reduce emissions on spurious and ill - founded grounds.
climate change and argue against action to reduce emissions
on spurious and ill - founded grounds.»
On the whole, in terms of magnitudes of risks that we used in our analysis [in the Stern Review Report on the Economics of Climate Change for the U.K. government], my best guess is that we underestimated the
On the whole, in terms of magnitudes of
risks that we used in our analysis [in the Stern Review
Report on the Economics of Climate Change for the U.K. government], my best guess is that we underestimated the
on the Economics of
Climate Change for the U.K. government], my best guess is that we underestimated them.
In their
report for CAP, Kelly and her co-author, Tracey Ross, write that
climate change «imposes an unfunded mandate
on state and local governments and the American people to manage these
risks and foot the bill for the damages.»
Failure to adapt to
climate change came fifth
on the WEF
report's list of
risks ranked by their potential impact
on humankind.
Hans - Otto Poertner, Ecophysiologist at Alfred - Wegener Institute, Co-Chair of United Nations Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group II and deputy coordinator of BIOACID explains: «The Fifth Assessment
Report AR5 of the IPCC has shown that the
risks of severe impacts for some organisms and ecosystems increases strongly between 1.5 and 2 degrees.
In its recent synthesis
report, the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) says there is «medium confidence» that climate change can indirectly increase risks of violent conflict by amplifying poverty and economic
Climate Change (IPCC) says there is «medium confidence» that
climate change can indirectly increase risks of violent conflict by amplifying poverty and economic
climate change can indirectly increase
risks of violent conflict by amplifying poverty and economic shocks.
In a new
report on climate change and human health in Virginia, the Natural Resources Defense Council says the
risk of heat - related illnesses will grow; coastal flooding, already a major concern, will worsen; and allergy season will start earlier and last longer.
Franklin Templeton participates in the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), annually measuring and
reporting on carbon emissions, as well as
risks and opportunities for our business due to the effects of
climate change.
Huq describes how the
reports of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change since 1990 evolved from identifying
risks and impacts to offering ways to limit those
risks.
The National Academies, fulfilling a congressional request, have issued a trio of invaluable
reports affirming the scientific case for a growing and largely harmful human influence
on climate; proposing a path and strategies for curbing American emissions of heat - trapping gases; and urging the country to work to cut
risks attending life with no new «normal»
climate patterns or coastlines.
The
report reviews research
on the behavioral element in every part of the
climate problem — from consumer habits to the human tendency to give outsize importance to immediate costs even when confronted with evidence of big long - term
risks.
Horton, who was involved in crafting the 2010
report, «
Climate Change Adaptation in New York City: Building a
Risk Management Response,» offered many thoughts, including one I had to convey
on Twitter:
But Dr. Somerville, who has also contributed to several
reports from the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, says the
risks that attend further silence, in the face of ever - growing emissions of heat - trapping gases, are far greater.
Here's an Associated Press summary in The Times and a BBC article
on the Dutch findings, which are in a
report initiated after an errant conclusion about the
risks from rising sea levels in the Netherlands made it into the 2007
climate assessments by the panel.
Back in February, when I wrote about the «burning embers» diagram of
climate risk that was left out of the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a reader, Josh J. of Snow Hill, N.C., gave the artwork this
climate risk that was left out of the 2007
reports of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, a reader, Josh J. of Snow Hill, N.C., gave the artwork this
Climate Change, a reader, Josh J. of Snow Hill, N.C., gave the artwork this review:
But in 2009, as I
reported more and more
on the inherent threat of
climate extremes in some of the world's poorest places (sub-Saharan Africa, particularly) I became concerned that the uncertain impact of greenhouse - driven warming paled beside other drivers of
risk (persistent poverty, doubling populations, and the existing pattern of super-drought).
Any useful summary of knowledge
on the causes and consequences of
climate change and possible responses would have to include a hard look at the substantial (and sobering) body of work
on what shapes human behavior: how people absorb or ignore scientific information — including the
climate panel's own
reports — and what roadblocks in human behavior await the menu of possible policy options for limiting
climate - related
risks.
Now 15 authors of the 2007
report, many of whom were authors
on the 2001
report as well, have written a paper salvaging the I.P.C.C. diagram of
climate risk that was dropped.
In 2001, when the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change produced its third set of
reports examining the causes and consequences of global warming, it included a fascinating illustration, called the «burning embers» diagram, showing gradients of rising
risk with rising temperatures.
(I'd first heard of of Norgaard's research while
reporting my 2007 article
on behavior and
climate risk.)
If Mann had wanted to point to an opposite end to the spectrum of ways in which scientists can contribute to public discourse
on global warming science and
risks, a better choice (in my view) would have been Susan Solomon's handling of the rollout of the 2007 science
report from the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change.
[This is the Intergorvernmental Panel
on Climate Change
report, «Managing the
Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance
Climate Change Adaptation,» which I wrote about here.]
Given that California is a best - case scenario * compared to other states (and, of course, countries) far more dependent
on coal, Long's piece and the underlying
report pose a strong challenge to those calling for a «deploy, deploy, deploy» approach to cutting
climate risks.
What the Human Development
report provides is a framework for thinking about how
climate change affects the range of options for improving human lives, as experienced through food security, education, health, natural disaster
risks, migration, and so
on.
There's an invaluable new
report out from an international team of experts
on paths to more effective
climate risk assessment that describes precisely why the work of Hansen and his co-authors and those who now review the work is essential:
The clearest
risks lie overseas, particularly in poor countries with weak public health agencies, according to a draft government
report on climate impacts
on human health and welfare, done at the request of President Bush.
Another, of course, is the 2012
report on managing
risks from extreme weather events from the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change.
Martin Parry, a co-chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, described the
report, released in April 2007, from which the «embers» diagram of
risk was excluded.
The
report takes the approach used by the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change in its «reasons for concern» section and the diagram known as «burning embers» — both of which essentially illustrate how rising temperatures equate with rising
risk in a variety of areas that matter to society.
One early test of Dr. Field's — and the panel's — resolve to be more transparent and inclusive is a special panel
report on managing the
risks from
climate extremes being initiated next month.