Sentences with phrase «report on climate sensitivity»

The Science Media Centre soon followed with an attempt at «expert reaction to new report on climate sensitivity published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation `.

See NIPCC reports on Climate Sensitivity and CO2 Science.

Not exact matches

As the Climate Science Special Report states, the magnitude of future climate change depends significantly on «remaining uncertainty in the sensitivity of Earth's climate to [greenhouse gas] emissions,»» White House spokesperson Raj Shah said Friday in a staClimate Science Special Report states, the magnitude of future climate change depends significantly on «remaining uncertainty in the sensitivity of Earth's climate to [greenhouse gas] emissions,»» White House spokesperson Raj Shah said Friday in a staclimate change depends significantly on «remaining uncertainty in the sensitivity of Earth's climate to [greenhouse gas] emissions,»» White House spokesperson Raj Shah said Friday in a staclimate to [greenhouse gas] emissions,»» White House spokesperson Raj Shah said Friday in a statement.

A leaked draft copy of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's fifth assessment report (AR5) surfaced earlier this summer and triggered a small tempest among climate bloggers, scientists and skeptics over revelations that a key metric, called the «Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity» (ECS), had been revised doClimate Change's fifth assessment report (AR5) surfaced earlier this summer and triggered a small tempest among climate bloggers, scientists and skeptics over revelations that a key metric, called the «Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity» (ECS), had been revised doclimate bloggers, scientists and skeptics over revelations that a key metric, called the «Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity» (ECS), had been revised doClimate Sensitivity» (ECS), had been revised downward.

On the face of it the range of the IPCC models is centrally within the A&H 90 % range, but visual inspection of Figure 1 suggests that A&H find that there is about a 45 % probability that climate sensitivity is below the lower end of the range quoted by Meehl in August 2004 (Of course the IPCC draft report, which I have not seen, may include models with lower sensitivity than 2.6 ºC).

A 2015 USDA report (Brown et al. 2015) on how climate affects agriculture delineates the sensitivities of specialty crops to many climate components (e.g., temperatures, atmospheric CO2 levels, water supply, cloud and light conditions, high winds and other extreme conditions).

But the Schmittner paper is only focused on a global climate sensitivity, and that's what they calculate and report.

On a more serious note, the problem for journalists (if they know what they are doing) in reporting a range of results for climate sensitivity is that the low end is ho - hum, but the higher end is more interesting.

Do you think that in the same way that the Solanki et al paper on solar sunspot reconstructions had a specific statement that their results did not contradict ideas of strong greenhouse warming in recent decades, this (the fact that climate sensitivity projections are not best estimates of possible future actual temperature increases) should be clearly noted in media releases put out by scientists when reporting climate sensitivity studies?

The most likely value of climate sensitivity from the AR4 [the fourth report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] was about 3 dclimate sensitivity from the AR4 [the fourth report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] was about 3 dClimate Change] was about 3 degrees.

Chief among climate scientists critical of the high - sensitivity holdouts is James Annan, an experienced climate modeler based in Japan who contributed to the 2007 science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate climate scientists critical of the high - sensitivity holdouts is James Annan, an experienced climate modeler based in Japan who contributed to the 2007 science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate climate modeler based in Japan who contributed to the 2007 science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Climate Change.

IPCC Working Group I — Workshop on Climate Sensitivity, Workshop Report École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France 26 — 29 July, 2004 pg 11

Since 1990, observed sea level has followed the uppermost uncertainty limit of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR), which was constructed by assuming the highest emission scenario combined with the highest climate sensitivity and adding an ad hoc amount of sea - level rise for «ice sheet uncertainty&raquClimate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR), which was constructed by assuming the highest emission scenario combined with the highest climate sensitivity and adding an ad hoc amount of sea - level rise for «ice sheet uncertainty&raquclimate sensitivity and adding an ad hoc amount of sea - level rise for «ice sheet uncertainty» (1).

The report concludes that «even with low climate sensitivity, on this path, the 2 °C target will be passed shortly after mid-century.»

As we all now know, Marcel Crok and Nicholas Lewis have written a report on the IPCC's treatment of climate sensitivity, published by the GWPF.

Huybers (2010) went on to say: «More recently reported values of climate sensitivity have not deviated substantially.

While we were all reading about climate sensitivity yesterday, the Renewable Energy Foundation published a devastating report by Gordon Hughes on depreciation of wind turbines.

He suggested that one example of possible tuning is that «reported values of climate sensitivity are anchored near the 3 ± 1.5 °C range initially suggested by the ad hoc study group on carbon dioxide and climate (1979) and that these were not changed because of a lack of compelling reason to do so».

It simply raises serious doubts concerning CAGW based on high climate sensitivity (as outlined by IPCC in its AR4 and, more recently, AR5 reports).

In 2009, NOAA» State of the Climate report said starting on page 22 that a 15 year pause would falsify the climate models, and thereby their predictions of things like sensiClimate report said starting on page 22 that a 15 year pause would falsify the climate models, and thereby their predictions of things like sensiclimate models, and thereby their predictions of things like sensitivity.

Contribution from working group I to the fifth assessment report by IPCC TS.5.4.1 Projected Near - term Changes in Climate Projections of near - term climate show small sensitivity to Green House Gas scenarios compared to model spread, but substantial sensitivity to uncertainties in aerosol emissions, especially on regional scales and for hydrological cycle varClimate Projections of near - term climate show small sensitivity to Green House Gas scenarios compared to model spread, but substantial sensitivity to uncertainties in aerosol emissions, especially on regional scales and for hydrological cycle varclimate show small sensitivity to Green House Gas scenarios compared to model spread, but substantial sensitivity to uncertainties in aerosol emissions, especially on regional scales and for hydrological cycle variables.

The three successive IPCC reports (1991 [2], 1996, and 2001 [3]-RRB- concentrated therefore, in addition to estimates of equilibrium sensitivity, on estimates of climate change over the 21st century, based on several scenarios of CO2 increase over this time interval, and using up to 18 general circulation models (GCMs) in the fourth IPCC Assessment Report (AR4)[4].

The original paper reports a climate sensitivity range with a lower 90 % CI boundary of 1.6 K, a median of 6.1 K, and a modal value of 2.1, putting it on the higher side of climate sensitivity estimates (Fig. 2 above).

I asked you yesterday whether you were aware that two of the climate sensitivity PDFs in Figure 9.20 of the IPCC AR4 WG1 report were not in fact based on a uniform prior in equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS or S), despite it being stated in Table 9.3 that they were so based.

Indeed, there are examples in IPCC reports of willingness to acknowledge the importance of expert (subjective) judgment, if on a limited basis (e.g., see discussions of climate sensitivity, detection and attribution and climate and weather extremes in WGI report, assessment of response strategies in the WGII report of AR4; see also Knutti and Hegerl (2008) for futher details on the role of expert judgement in estimating climate sensitivity).

In its 2013 report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) gave a likely range for climate sensitivity of between 1.5 and 4.5 degrees CClimate Change (IPCC) gave a likely range for climate sensitivity of between 1.5 and 4.5 degrees Cclimate sensitivity of between 1.5 and 4.5 degrees Celsius.

As Forster explains, the GWPF report is placing all its eggs on one basket when it comes to estimating climate sensitivity.

Reported evaluations of climate sensitivities have ranged from 0.5 K / doubling to > 5 K on doubling CO2.

The US «special report» focuses on climate science talking points — surface temperature (instruments at 2m from the ground and ocean surface temperature), hydrology, climate sensitivity, sea level rise, acidification, etc..

The IPCC report acknowledges the scientific debate that continues over the issue of climate sensitivity and the different results between models and analysis based on observations.

How long will it take for the rest of the climate science community to get on board and recognize that CO2 climate sensitivity is much lower than the previously sanctioned «Official IPCC results» and on which the EPA is unwisely basing (obsolete AR4 Report version) its CO2 emissions control regulations?

Design / methodology / approach: The analyses are based on the IPCC's own reports, the observed temperatures versus the IPCC model - calculated temperatures and the warming effects of greenhouse gases based on the critical studies of climate sensitivity (CS).

This doesn't just raise issues for measuring and reporting climate sensitivity, it extends on into any decision theory that may depend upon it.

The Working Group III IPCC report [on mitigation which the Economist used in its most recent attempt to misinform on climate sensitivity] is no where near final, the final draft has not even been produced yet.

Carbon Brief reported that Ridley made a wide range of claims throughout, touching on subjects from ocean acidification and climate sensitivity through to energy subsidies and the «benefits» of global warming.

I believe the alternative assessment report to AR5 should clearly differentiate climate sensitivity estimates based on these two approaches.

The SAP 3.1 report describes complex mathematical models used to simulate the Earth's climate on some of the most powerful supercomputers, and assesses their ability to reproduce observed climate features, and their sensitivity to changes in conditions such as atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide.

Energy budget estimates of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient climate response (TCR) are derived based on the best estimates and uncertainty ranges for forcing provided in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Scientific Report (AR5).

Climate sensitivity - In Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, equilibrium climate sensitivity refers to the equilibrium change in the annual mean global surface temperature following a doubling of the atmospheric equivalent carbon dioxide concentClimate sensitivity - In Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, equilibrium climate sensitivity refers to the equilibrium change in the annual mean global surface temperature following a doubling of the atmospheric equivalent carbon dioxide concentClimate Change (IPCC) reports, equilibrium climate sensitivity refers to the equilibrium change in the annual mean global surface temperature following a doubling of the atmospheric equivalent carbon dioxide concentclimate sensitivity refers to the equilibrium change in the annual mean global surface temperature following a doubling of the atmospheric equivalent carbon dioxide concentration.

Energy budget estimates of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient climate response (TCR) are derived using the comprehensive 1750 — 2011 time series and the uncertainty ranges for forcing components provided in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Working Group I Report, along with its estimates of heat accumulation in the climate climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient climate response (TCR) are derived using the comprehensive 1750 — 2011 time series and the uncertainty ranges for forcing components provided in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Working Group I Report, along with its estimates of heat accumulation in the climate climate response (TCR) are derived using the comprehensive 1750 — 2011 time series and the uncertainty ranges for forcing components provided in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Working Group I Report, along with its estimates of heat accumulation in the climate Climate Change Fifth Assessment Working Group I Report, along with its estimates of heat accumulation in the climate climate system.

Climate sensitivity to CO2 used for regulatory purposes should be based on available physical data as demonstrated in the above report, not un-validated climate simulation Climate sensitivity to CO2 used for regulatory purposes should be based on available physical data as demonstrated in the above report, not un-validated climate simulation climate simulation models.

With upcoming release of IPCC Fifth Assessment Reports beginning late in September, there will be a sharp focus on specific issues like projected sea - level rise but also on broader issues like climate sensitivity and the decade - and - a-half-long slow - down in the rate of overall warming.

Climate sensitivity estimates from new research beginning in 2011 (colored), compared with the assessed range given in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) and the collection of climate models used in the IPClimate sensitivity estimates from new research beginning in 2011 (colored), compared with the assessed range given in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) and the collection of climate models used in the IPClimate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) and the collection of climate models used in the IPclimate models used in the IPCC AR5.

Loehle estimated the equilibrium climate sensitivity from his transient calculation based on the average transient: equilibrium ratio projected by the collection of climate models used in the IPCC's most recent Assessment Report.

The probabilistic analyses of DAI reported in this section draw substantially on (subjective) Bayesian probabilities to describe key uncertainties in the climate system, such as climate sensitivity, the rate of oceanic heat uptake, current radiative forcing, and indirect aerosol forcing.

The TSD purports to rely on IPCC work as a basis for a supposed «sensitivity» of climate to increasing atmospheric C02, but fails to mention that the most recent IPCC report completely undermines any basis for determining climate sensitivity with the following statement: «No best estimate for equilibrium climate sensitivity can now be given because of a lack of agreement on values across assessed lines of evidence and studies.»

Neither is the point that Nic Lewis may have some criticism of some papers on climate sensitivity or of the IPCC report.

I have written extensively on the shortcomings of the Administration's determination of the SCC (for example, http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/obamas-social-cost-carbon-odds-science) and the folks at the Heritage Foundation just yesterday released a report looking at what would happen in DICE model if recent estimates of the equilibrium climate sensitivity were used in place of the (outdated) ones used by the Administration.

-LSB-...] «Sensitivity training directly on the battlefield» sounds like something libs would do NOAA Misrepresents Inspector General Report New report exonerates U.S. climate researchers What would you expect from this -LSReport New report exonerates U.S. climate researchers What would you expect from this -LSreport exonerates U.S. climate researchers What would you expect from this -LSB-...]

«Working on the IPCC, there was a lot of discussion of climate sensitivity since it's so important for our future,» said Shindell, who was lead author of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report's chapter on Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing.