The study used a mixed methods approach to explore the success, barriers and self -
reported outcomes of the program.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability
of new and maturing
programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development
programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787
program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing
programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost
of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates
of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates
of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect
of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result
of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect
of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution
of key milestones such as the receipt
of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation
of our announced acquisition
of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability
of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk
of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production
of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts
of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak
of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact
of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition
of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect
of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect
of changes in tax law, such as the effect
of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations
of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect
of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability
of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass
of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many
of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment
of interest on, and principal
of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness
of any interest rate hedging
programs; 28) the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial
reporting; 29) the
outcome or impact
of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition
of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result
of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing
program; 34) the risks
of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions
of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: our ability to achieve our financial, strategic and operational plans or initiatives; our ability to predict and manage medical costs and price effectively and develop and maintain good relationships with physicians, hospitals and other health care providers; the impact
of modifications to our operations and processes; our ability to identify potential strategic acquisitions or transactions and realize the expected benefits
of such transactions, including with respect to the Merger; the substantial level
of government regulation over our business and the potential effects
of new laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations; the
outcome of litigation, regulatory audits, investigations, actions and / or guaranty fund assessments; uncertainties surrounding participation in government - sponsored
programs such as Medicare; the effectiveness and security
of our information technology and other business systems; unfavorable industry, economic or political conditions, including foreign currency movements; acts
of war, terrorism, natural disasters or pandemics; our ability to obtain shareholder or regulatory approvals required for the Merger or the requirement to accept conditions that could reduce the anticipated benefits
of the Merger as a condition to obtaining regulatory approvals; a longer time than anticipated to consummate the proposed Merger; problems regarding the successful integration
of the businesses
of Express Scripts and Cigna; unexpected costs regarding the proposed Merger; diversion
of management's attention from ongoing business operations and opportunities during the pendency
of the Merger; potential litigation associated with the proposed Merger; the ability to retain key personnel; the availability
of financing, including relating to the proposed Merger; effects on the businesses as a result
of uncertainty surrounding the proposed Merger; as well as more specific risks and uncertainties discussed in our most recent
report on Form 10 - K and subsequent
reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section
of www.cigna.com as well as on Express Scripts» most recent
report on Form 10 - K and subsequent
reports on Forms 10 - Q and 8 - K available on the Investor Relations section
of www.express-scripts.com.
Released in 2010, this
report details the economic impact estimates
of 10 years»
outcomes from the Florida High Tech Corridor Council's investments into its Matching Grant Research
Program.
With such a
program it is not possible to hide from participants whether or not they received the intervention and
outcome measures rely on self -
reports of events that may have occurred a few years in the past.
«
Outcomes will include a collaborative culture in the
program, effective
reporting, evaluation, support and rigorous monitoring
of scientific effort to promote high quality targeted research to meet the objectives
of the
program,» the tender document says.
Monitoring, evaluation,
reporting and improvement are critical components
of natural resource management
programs, particularly in highly variable natural systems where the
outcomes from actions can be uncertain.
Research on the impact
of depression on home visiting
outcomes is mixed with some studies
reporting negative results while others suggesting that depressed mothers may benefit from these
programs.
«According to recent press
reports, the Governor and others have suggested that perhaps the best
outcome of this year's concurrent negotiations regarding the rent laws and the 421 - a tax incentive
program would be a simple extension
of both,» the Assembly members wrote in the letter, which was provided to Capital.
Auditors found 27
of 57
outcome reports weren't finished and 93
of 152
program reports were never completed.
Funded by a $ 12 million grant, the FORCE - TJR research
program has developed a national database
of surgical results and patient -
reported outcomes from more than 30,000 patients.
In a
report of their findings, published in the December issue
of the American Journal
of Public Health, the researchers say the
program was designed to prevent suffering at a time when adolescent depression rates are on the rise and many believe awareness, early recognition and effective therapies can lead to better
outcomes.
«Unemployment is a critical issue facing people on the spectrum who have valuable contributions to make but not enough opportunities to have work,» said Paul Shattuck, PhD, leader
of the Life Course
Outcomes Research
Program in the Institute, which produces the National Autism Indicators
Report series.
A
report from the Council
of Graduate Schools details
outcomes for underrepresented minority students in STEM doctoral
programs
Answers to these and other critical questions, addressing life
outcomes beyond clinical interventions, are the focus of a report issued today from Drexel University's A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, from its Life Course Outcomes Research
outcomes beyond clinical interventions, are the focus
of a
report issued today from Drexel University's A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, from its Life Course
Outcomes Research
Outcomes Research
Program.
Within the U.S., the most widely used surgical
outcomes reporting system is the National Surgical Quality Improvement
Program (NSQIP), which is coordinated through the American College
of Surgeons.
«MMCI significantly increased a teacher's odds
of attaining the level
of quality interactions needed for pre-k
programs to most meaningfully contribute to children's social and academic
outcomes,» said Kelly Maxwell, senior
program area co-director for early childhood at Child Trends and co-author
of the
report.
But NCATS asked a working group
of its advisory committee for help with a key part
of how to do that — developing «meaningful, measurable goals and
outcomes for the CTSA
program,» according to the working group's draft
report released today.
Consequently, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), or Obamacare, may improve cancer
outcomes in young adults as it expands coverage to many who have been uninsured, said first author Ayal Aizer, MD, MHS,
of the Harvard Radiation Oncology
Program and senior author Paul Nguyen, MD,
of Radiation Oncology at DF / BWCC in a
report published in the Journal
of Clinical Oncology.
In a second study presented at the ESMO 2014 Congress, researchers
report that about 20 %
of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma have cancer cells that express a protein called
programmed cell - death ligand 1 (PD - L1) that is associated with poorer
outcomes.
The current phase
of her research
program, conducted in the division
of Cancer Care and Epidemiology (CCE) at the Queen's Cancer Research Institute, involves extracting information from pathology
reports in patients with biliary tract cancer and looking at the natural history, treatment
outcomes, and mortality trends in this population.
«Recent conclusions from the IARC Monographs
Program, along with media
reports that Monograph
Program leaders have manipulated
outcomes, should raise serious concerns for all governments and private organizations that donate the funding that makes up IARC's annual budget,» said Cal Dooley, President and CEO
of the American Chemistry Council (ACC).
All research results,
reports, and the
outcomes of our meetings and
programs will be made broadly available through publications and over the World Wide Web.
Today's Politico
report provides new evidence that the IARC Monographs
Program suffers from a lack
of transparency, conflicts
of interest, and is beholden to the agenda
of those seeking specific
outcomes.
CHIROPRACTIC
PROGRAM NBCE Detail
Report * Canadian Boards * Clinical Internship
Outcomes Report * DCP Clinical Skills Enhancement Center
Outcomes Report 2016 - 2017 CSA Annual
Outcomes Report * DC Accreditation CCE Final
Report of Interim Site Visit, October 2016 *
Observational studies have a high risk
of bias owing to problems such as self - selection
of interventions (people who believe in the benefits
of meditation or who have prior experience with meditation are more likely to enroll in a meditation
program and
report that they benefited from one) and use
of outcome measures that can be easily biased by participants» beliefs in the benefits
of meditation.
The evaluation
report released on 12 April by Mission Australia and the University
of Adelaide highlights that quality intensive casework support is critical to the
program's success in addressing the multiple and complex barriers that can affect a young person's ability to stay in school, their social participation and achievement
of positive learning and self - development
outcomes.
In its
report Eager to Learn, the Early Pedagogy Committee
of the National Research Council recommended that «the next generation
of research... examine more rigorously the characteristics
of programs that produce beneficial
outcomes for all children.»
In addressing the point
of contention, the Productivity Commission is
of the opinion that «there is little evidence or systematic processes in place to evaluate policies,
program and teaching practices to identify what works best in schools and early learning centres», despite the amount
of data that is collected to monitor and
report on student and school
outcomes.
(a) Each plan shall be developed annually and shall include
program objectives, activities,
program development and maintenance planning, school counseling curriculum, professional development planning, evaluation methods based on data analysis
of program results and closing the gap analysis
reports to inform
program improvement, and assessment
of the resources necessary to support positive student
outcomes.
But after reviewing the
reports issued by a trio
of research teams studying the Milwaukee
program - one headed by the University
of Wisconsin's John Witte, another by Harvard University's Paul Peterson, and a third by Princeton University's Cecilia Rouse - Sawhill and Smith claim that «it is simply not possible at the current time to render a clear verdict on the
outcome of the experiment.»
In the original memo that unveiled the new performance
report, NJDOE's Chief Performance Officer / Assistant Commissioner
of Data, Research, Evaluation and
Reporting, Bari Erlichson (2013) stated: While [sic] the evaluation
of student
outcome data is crucial for school improvement, we know that these data alone can not capture the dozens
of other essential elements
of schools such as a positive school climate, participation in extracurricular
programs and the development
of non-cognitive skills.
Some also proposed that successful results
reported in the use
of these
programs are confounded by the fact that positive
outcomes may be more
of a consequence
of the Hawthorne Effect or a change in teaching strategy than a validation
of one particular form
of media over another (Finkelman & McMann, 1995; Tierney et al., 1997).
Summary: This article
reports on anew Princeton study examined the long - term effects
of a 20 - year - old
program known as Fast Track, one
of the earliest and largest
programs designed to improve life
outcomes for at - risk students by teaching psychosocial skills.
Clowes later wrote a
report for Heartland responding to the lack
of improvement in educational
outcomes in the Milwaukee voucher
program and disillusionment
of some school reformers.
Regardless
of whether one feels that a general lack
of positive
outcomes tends to discredit these
programs, one can not overlook the fact that the
reports about their effectiveness consistently identify three specific opportunities to increase reading achievement: an increased availability
of high interest books, sustained wide area reading, and opportunities for students to share their reading experiences with others (Eriksson, 2002; Krashen, 2002).
This
report seeks to use the lessons
of Middle School Matters» design and implementation to inform and support the efforts
of others seeking to improve student
outcomes by implementing school - based
programs.
The draft accountability rules, to be released this summer, will encourage states to identify high - and low - performing teacher preparation
programs across all kinds
of educational models, not just those based in colleges and universities; urge a transition from current input - based
reporting requirements to a focus on more meaningful
outcomes; and likely limit
program eligibility for TEACH grants — which are available to students who are planning to become teachers in a high - need field in a low - income school — to only effective teacher preparation
programs.
This
report addresses research questions regarding the
program's 1) implementation fidelity, 2) performance goals, 3) impact on student attendance and mathematics achievement
outcomes, 4) impact on student aspirations for college, studying STEM subjects in college, and pursuing STEM careers, and 5) impact on measures
of teacher effectiveness.
Supplemental
Reports of the National Assessment
of Career and Technical Education (2013) are studies commissioned from independent researchers and evaluators that examine different aspects
of career and technical education in the United States, such as student
outcomes and the implementation
of career and technical education
programs.
The Evaluation
of the Comprehensive School Reform
Program Implementation and Outcomes: Third Year Report (2008) provides third - year study findings regarding schools receiving comprehensive school reform (CSR) assistance awards in 2002, focusing on how CSR award receipt was related to subsequent changes in achievement and whether aspects of program implementation were associated with achievement
Program Implementation and
Outcomes: Third Year
Report (2008) provides third - year study findings regarding schools receiving comprehensive school reform (CSR) assistance awards in 2002, focusing on how CSR award receipt was related to subsequent changes in achievement and whether aspects
of program implementation were associated with achievement
program implementation were associated with achievement gains.
«The
report acknowledges that
programs such as TAP take time to change attitudes and alter a school's culture, and that measurables such as test scores and teacher retention might be better thought
of as longer - term or final
outcomes.»
The CSPRs are annual
reports required under ESEA that states use to submit information to the U.S. Department
of Education about their activities and
outcomes related to specific ESEA
programs.
The Evaluation
of the Comprehensive School Reform
Program Implementation and Outcomes: Fifth - Year Report (2010) presents overall findings from the evaluation of the comprehensive school reform (CSR) program, including an examination of whether CSR funding had a positive influence on academic achie
Program Implementation and
Outcomes: Fifth - Year
Report (2010) presents overall findings from the evaluation
of the comprehensive school reform (CSR)
program, including an examination of whether CSR funding had a positive influence on academic achie
program, including an examination
of whether CSR funding had a positive influence on academic achievement.
The
report highlighted various
programs» «success in improving student or other
outcomes» and «the level
of evidence they meet.»
During middle school, for example, students from elementary schools that had implemented the Developmental Studies Center's Child Development Project — a
program that emphasizes community building — were found to outperform middle school students from comparison elementary schools on academic
outcomes (higher grade - point averages and achievement test scores), teacher ratings
of behavior (better academic engagement, respectful behavior, and social skills), and self -
reported misbehavior (less misconduct in school and fewer delinquent acts)(Battistich, 2001).
An update to Title II
of the Higher Education and Opportunity Act, the proposed regulations would shift the law's focus from
reporting program inputs — an applicant's qualifications — to
reporting data on graduate
outcomes, such as teacher performance.
Not only have multiple Department
of Education (USED) studies concluded that the
program has failed to improve educational
outcomes for participating students, but two U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
reports have also identified its repeated management and accountability failures.»
The new requirements would have states
report annually on teacher preparation
programs — including alternative certification
programs — based on employment
outcomes, new teacher and employer feedback, student learning
outcomes, and assurance
of specialized accreditation.
• Use
of multiple forms
of evidence
of student learning, not just test scores; • Extensive professional development that enables teachers to better assess and assist their students; • Incorporation
of ongoing feedback to students about their performance to improve learning
outcomes; • Public
reporting on school progress in academic and non-academic areas, using a variety
of information sources and including improvement plans; and • Sparing use
of external interventions, such as school reorganization, to give reform
programs the opportunity to succeed.