Sentences with phrase «reporting profit per partner»

Not exact matches

Cenovus reported fourth - quarter net income of $ 620 million or 50 cents per share on Thursday, well ahead of $ 91 million, or 11 cents per share, in the year - earlier period, thanks to better refinery profits, stronger oil prices and production that almost doubled after it bought out its oilsands partner, Houston - based ConocoPhillips, last year.

Contrary to some reports, the investment has not made him the world's wealthiest musician; the $ 1.4 bn will be split between the six founding partners of Elevation Partners, which only get 20 per cent of partners of Elevation Partners, which only get 20 per cent of Partners, which only get 20 per cent of profits.

White & Case and King & Spalding have both reported a rise in profit per equity partner (PEP) as K&L Gates reported a slight dip.

The ongoing spat around the value - or otherwise - of firms reporting profit per equity partner (PEP) shows no sign of abating, with a stream of industry leaders weighing in on the debate.

Travers Smith has reported revenue growth of 13 % and an increase in profit per equity partner (PEP) of 8 % for the year ended 30 June 2016.

White & Case reported a 7 % rise in profit per equity partner (PEP) in 2014 to $ 2m (# 1.3 m), up from $ 1.87 m (# 1.14 m) in 2013.

The 2018 Am Law 100, which looks at numbers from 2017, reports that gross revenue grew 5.5 percent on average, net income increased by 6.1 percent, profit per equity partner grew by 6.3 percent, revenue per lawyer moved up 3.2 percent, and headcount rose 2.2 percent.

Dundas & Wilson has reported significant fall key financial metrics with turnover down 11 %, net profit down 21 % and profits per equity partner plunging 22 %.

In one of the articles that accompanies the report, Nicholas Bruch, senior analyst at ALM Legal Intelligence, which assisted in compiling the results, and Hugh A. Simons, an industry analyst and former COO at Ropes & Gray in Boston, write that 78 percent of the firms in this year's Am Law 100 surpassed their pre-recession levels of profits per equity partner — and did so in large part through management.

When The American Lawyer released its Am Law 100 report last week, many noticed a correlation between increased PPP (profits per partner) on the one hand and the decline in the number of equity partners and growth in the category of non-equity partners on the other.

Macfarlanes this week (24 June) reported that, while turnover jumped by 4.5 % to a new high of # 110m, its profits remained almost static, falling slightly from average profits per equity partner (PEP) of # 1.125 m last year to # 1.1 m.

He was interviewed by Lee Pacchia on his Business of Law show about his firm's decision to stop reporting profits per equity partner.

After a down year in 2010, Shearman & Sterling saw profits per partner hold steady at roughly $ 1.56 million in 2011, while its gross revenue inched up less than 2 percent to $ 750 million and its revenue per lawyer ticked down less than 3 percent to $ 900,000, according to The American Lawyer's reporting.

According to a report by the Georgetown Law Center for the Study of the Legal Profession, U.S. law firms saw revenue and profits per equity partner grow at staggering rates of 37.5 percent and 25.6 percent respectively.

With several major matters settling on one hand and the firm investing in expansion on the other, Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman saw both its gross revenue and profits per partner decline in 2011, according to reporting by The American Lawyer.

If you follow the legal media, one of the biggest stories so far this year was when the major law firm, Dentons, announced it was no longer reporting average profits per equity partner, saying that it was a meaningless statistic for a firm that operates in so many global jurisdictions.

Two - thirds of firms participating in the survey report increases in gross revenue, revenue per lawyer and profits per equity partner in 2014.»

An annual institution, the report analyzes the 2012 financial year and ranks United States - based law firms by overall revenue, number of attorneys, profits per partner, and various other measures.

Profits rose on average by 8 %, and median profit per equity partner rose # 20,000 on last year's report to # 107,000.

Gateley has reported a significant hike in profits with profit per equity partner (PEP) soaring by 22 % while revenue also climbed 7 % during the 2012 - 13 financial year.

Cleary: According to reporting by The American Lawyer, the firm's gross revenue surged to $ 1.125 billion from $ 1.05 billion, while profits per equity partner rose to $ 2.7 million from $ 2.6 million last year.

Coupling a small bump in gross revenue with diligent cost - cutting efforts, Holland & Knight enjoyed a double - digit increase in profits per partner for the second straight year in 2011, according to The American Lawyer's reporting.

Davis Polk: According to reporting by The American Lawyer, the firm took in $ 910 million, up from $ 870 million, and its profits per partner rose to $ 2.3 million from $ 2.2 million.

In 2010, Cravath and Sullivan broke the $ 3 million profits per partner mark, according to our reporting, with Wachtell partners clearing an average of $ 4.3 million, according to the final results of that year's survey.

Weil's equity partner head count declined by 4.1 percent, which contributed to a profits per partner surge of 8 percent last year, our reporting showed.

(This may be contrasted in some of these firms with reported increases in profits per partner, which they achieve by reducing partner rolls.

A year after posting declines in both revenue and profits, Baker & McKenzie more than regained lost ground this past financial year, reporting an 8 % increase in firm revenues and a 13 % surge in profits per equity partner.

Revenue at the national player dropped to # 104m from # 107m, a 3 % decrease, while profit per equity partner also fell to # 275,000, down 3 % from last year's reported figure of # 284,000.

Dentons has opted to stop reporting average profits per equity partner, citing the metric as «meaningless» for a global firm, and claiming it could be potentially damaging to client relations.

Citing a weak second half and aggressive lateral investment, Shearman & Sterling posted a slight gain in gross revenue, a slight dip in revenue per lawyer, and stagnant profits per partner, according to The American Lawyer's reporting.

With revenue growth near 12 percent and profits per partner growth of close to 14 percent last year, Latham & Watkins blew past its previous high - water mark for revenue, and roughly matched its prerecession record for profitability, according to reporting by The American Lawyer.

The firm reported steady growth across the board, with gross revenue increasing almost 10 percent and profits per partner rising 7.2 percent, according to reporting by The American Lawyer.

Boston - based Goodwin Procter saw its gross revenues grow 2.5 percent to $ 695.5 million last year, but a net loss of 13 equity partners helped push profits per partner up 3.4 percent to $ 1.5 million, according to The American Lawyer's reporting.

In the year leading up to its impending merger with McKenna Long & Aldridge, San Diego — based Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps saw its gross revenue fall nearly 18 percent to $ 83.5 million and its profits per partner drop almost 21 percent to $ 535,000, according to reporting by The American Lawyer.

In a year that saw it move into a new Manhattan headquarters and install a new chairman, Proskauer Rose increased its gross revenue by more than 6 percent and its profits per partner by 9 percent, according to The American Lawyer's reporting.

Willkie Farr & Gallagher saw its gross revenue rise 2.7 percent to $ 548 million and its profits per partner increase 2.6 percent to $ 2.15 million last year, according to The American Lawyer's reporting.

Curtis, Mallet - Prevost, Colt & Mosle saw its revenue pop nearly 18 percent to $ 165 million, and its profits per partner rise by nearly 10 percent to more than $ 1.5 million last year, according to The American Lawyer's reporting.

Though it posted new records in net income, revenue per lawyer, and profits per partner, Bingham McCutchen saw its 15 - year topline growth streak end in 2011 as gross revenue fell 0.5 percent to $ 868.5 million, according to reporting by The American Lawyer.

2010 average profits per equity partner should have been $ 980,000, not $ 1,605,000 as reported by the firm last year.

As we've reported before, profits per partner at Howrey dropped 35 percent, to about $ 846,000 in 2009.

Arent Fox, bolstered by a strong year in the firm's intellectual property, civil litigation and government contracts practices, saw revenue per lawyer increase 2.7 percent to $ 750,000 in 2012 and profit per partner rise to $ 850,000, a 2.4 percent increase over last year, our reporting shows.

According to the new information, profits per partner last year were $ 1.04 million, not the $ 1.8 million The American Lawyer initially reported.

White & Case saw its gross revenue rise about 4 percent to $ 1.33 billion in 2011, while the firm's profits per equity partner fell about 5 percent to $ 1.475 million, according to reporting by The American Lawyer.

Regional partners also enjoyed higher profits — more than 70 % of those who grew profit per equity partner (PEP) reported an increase of more than 10 %, compared to less than 40 % of City firms.

The Missouri — based firm saw gross revenue dip 4.7 percent to $ 266 million and its profits per partner fall 7.1 percent to $ 525,000 in 2011, according to The American Lawyer's reporting.

With several major matters settling on one hand and the firm investing in expansion on the other, Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman saw both its gross revenue and its profits per partner decline in 2011, according to reporting by The American Lawyer.

While Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel's gross revenue hit a new high in 2011, the firm's profits per partner fell 3.5 percent, according to The American Lawyer's reporting.

The firm saw its gross revenue drop 3.5 percent to $ 422.5 million last year, while profits per equity partner rose 5.2 percent to $ 705,000, according to reporting by The American Lawyer.

Charles Russell Speechlys has reported a 23 % jump in profit per equity partner (PEP) in its first full financial year results following the merger of legacy firms Charles Russell and Speechly Bircham, as Trowers & Hamlins reported flat net profit.

Legal Week reported in August that Ashurst held back distributions due that month after a difficult 2015 - 16, when revenue and profit per equity partner (PEP) both plunged by double digits.