All of these studies are
reporting upstream emission estimates that are 10 - to 20-fold higher than those reported in this new paper by the Allen and colleagues.
Not exact matches
As well as its decision on
upstream oil and gas, the World Bank Group said on Tuesday that it would, among other things,
report the greenhouse gas
emissions arising from investment projects it finances in «key
emissions - producing sectors» from 2018.
Walmart does not disclose GHG
emissions from its international marine shipping activities; it does estimate
emissions from all «
upstream transportation and distribution» — which includes marine shipping, trucking, air freight and rail freight — in its 2014 Carbon Disclosure Project
report.
Probably the most discussed aspect of the NGP
Report (see this excellent discussion on CBC's The 180 beginning at around the seven minute mark) is the JRP's treatment (or lack thereof) of «
upstream» greenhouse gas
emissions (GHGs), and specifically the apparent asymmetry between the JRP's decision to consider the need to open markets for projected increases in oil production — the vast majority of which would uncontrovertibly be from the oil sands — but not the GHGs associated with this projected growth.
... And 11 % in Full Lifecycle Analysis But that's just
upstream emissions: On a full lifecycle basis, the
report concludes, «
emission reduction potential is likely in the 7 - 11 % range.»
Only 50 % Reduction in
Upstream Emissions Possible According to the report Carbon Capture and Storage in the Alberta Tar Sands, CCS «has limited potential to reduce upstream emissions to levels comparable with the average for conventional oil,» with «even the most optimistic estimates from industry experts» showing reductions in the 10 - 30 % range in the medium term and up to 50 % in the lo
Upstream Emissions Possible According to the report Carbon Capture and Storage in the Alberta Tar Sands, CCS «has limited potential to reduce upstream emissions to levels comparable with the average for conventional oil,» with «even the most optimistic estimates from industry experts» showing reductions in the 10 - 30 % range in the medium term and up to 50 % in the l
Emissions Possible According to the
report Carbon Capture and Storage in the Alberta Tar Sands, CCS «has limited potential to reduce
upstream emissions to levels comparable with the average for conventional oil,» with «even the most optimistic estimates from industry experts» showing reductions in the 10 - 30 % range in the medium term and up to 50 % in the lo
upstream emissions to levels comparable with the average for conventional oil,» with «even the most optimistic estimates from industry experts» showing reductions in the 10 - 30 % range in the medium term and up to 50 % in the l
emissions to levels comparable with the average for conventional oil,» with «even the most optimistic estimates from industry experts» showing reductions in the 10 - 30 % range in the medium term and up to 50 % in the long term.