Not exact matches
Given that PETA has a history of committing larceny, a history of getting animals
under false pretenses, a history of lying to people who surrender their animals, and a history of underreporting killing, there is simply no reason to trust its
reporting to VDACS.
Section 1681q of the FCRA imposes a $ 5,000 fine and / or imprisonment up to a year on one «who knowingly and willingly obtains information on a consumer from a consumer
reporting agency
under false pretenses.»
The Scotts sued, claiming that their credit
reports had been obtained
under false pretenses, in violation of federal and state law, and for failure to provide adequate notice
under New York law.
To determine whether the Scotts» credit
reports had been obtained
under false pretenses, the court examined the «permissible purposes» set forth in section 1681b of the FCRA.