Sentences with phrase «reposition global warming»

Loyal followers of my work know exactly where I am going with Gore's insinuations about corporate corruption «designed to «reposition global warming facts as something to doubt.»

The odds of Charles and David Koch having ever heard of an industry - wide directive to reposition global warming as theory rather than fact is practically nil.

In my previous blog post, I showed how one anonymous op - ed writer tried to casually drop the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase into his piece to insinuate skeptic climate scientists received illicit industry money in exchange for the promise to lie to the public.

And what is the critical thing to know about the «reposition global warming» phrase?

Such as this one, involving the one and only time where Ross Gelbspan himself mentions anything about the situation surrounding the initial appearance of the «reposition global warming» phrase:

Intriguing how Gelbspan is currently Facebook Friends with Phil Shabecoff, considering it essentially was Shabecoff who was arguably the most prominent reporter to first publicize the ICE memos and the the «reposition global warming» phrase.

WFA's «Information Council for the Environment» that Gelbspan so widely touts as smoking gun evidence of a top - down industry directive «to reposition global warming as theory rather than fact «lasted just six months ** [See Author's 12/19/14 note below] in its entirety, with the actual PR tour being restricted to just three cities in May of 1991 and maybe a single 60 - second national radio ad on Rush Limbaugh's program at that time.

Narrator: In order to protect profits, these industries devised a plan, to reposition global warming as a theory and not fact and designed what a recent Greenpeace report dubbed the climate change denial machine.

One thing to always keep in mind about the «reposition global warming» phrase accusation against skeptic climate scientists is how it is literally all that Al Gore and his followers have to prove skeptics are corrupt.

It all rests on the phrase «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact», which has been endlessly regurgitated by, among others, Al Gore, Naomi Oreskes, George Monbiot, the Union of Concerned Scientists, James Hoggan and Eric Pooley.

The majority of internet references I initially found credited the accusation to ex-Boston Globe reporter / book author / «Pulitzer - winner» Ross Gelbspan, and his «discovery» that the fossil fuel industry was paying skeptic scientists «under the table» to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — according to a leaked coal association memo he supposedly found.

The Information Council on the Environment, which is a coal industry front group, incorporating the National Coal Association, Western Fuels, and Edison Electrical Institute amongst others, was formed in 1991 to «reposition global warming as theory (not fact).»

The real question to ask here is whether the people of «Greenpeace USA née Ozone Action» made this insinuation with malice, knowing the portrayal of the «reposition global warming» phrase as an industry - approved directive was false from the start.

Her footnote # 12 for the «reposition global warming» says,

A sledgehammer message if there ever was one: Nasty, greedy billionaire industrialists who hatched a plan to pay skeptic scientists associated with think tanks to lie to the public, and the hard evidence is that sinister - sounding «reposition global warming» phrase.

In 1991, the Information Council for the Environment (ICE) was created by coal and mining associations with the objective to «reposition global warming as theory (not fact) if not a myth» and «attack the proponents [by comparing] global warming to historical or mythical instances of gloom and doom.»

As I've said on several occasions here and elsewhere, the major problem with global warming believers» enslavement to the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase is that it is not in any way proof of an arrangement between between skeptics and industry officials involving payments made for false climate assessments.

Never mind that neither Gore nor anyone else who quotes the «reposition global warming» phrase and other memo phrases ever shows them in their full context or mentions any in - depth details about the leak, and none of them have ever proven a quid pro quo arrangement exists between skeptics and industry funders.

A particularly prominent one is Dossier # 5, where the UCS clearly loves (as I pointed out in my July 9 blog post) a document scan out of Greenpeace's old collection (click image below, to enlarge) of the Western Fuels Association's «Information Council for the Environment» (ICE) documents — the ones with the so - called «leaked strategy memo to reposition global warming as theory rather than fact».

The «reposition global warming» phrase can only be evidence of a cynical quid pro quo arrangement when it is accompanied by proof that skeptic climate scientists were paid industry money in exchange for lies about global warming.

As ever, the fatal problem with enviro - activists» enslavement to the «reposition global warming as theory» phrase as proof that skeptics are paid illicit money to lie about certainty of global warming is that there is no evidence of it being a top - down fossil fuel industry directive of any kind.

Australian professor / lecturer Sharon Beder's site's «Information Council on [sic — incorrect word] the Environment» (ICE) section, which I showcased in my prior blog post, reveals the key clue of where the Gore - Gelbspan «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase is found in its original context.

A timeline of where, how and when that «reposition global warming» phrase first showed up is something global warming believers would hate, since it might prompt a total loss of faith in the validity of that central accusation point.

His next version three days later has basically the same text about the ICE and the the «reposition global warming» phrase that's seen in the current Wikipedia ICE page — word - for - word identical in places now and in his first mention of it, including the «mythical instances of gloom and doom» bit.

In my prior piece about the spread of Ross Gelbspan's accusation that skeptic climate scientists are paid by the fossil fuel industry to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact ``, I barely skimmed the surface of the sheer number of repetitions of it.

Global warming believers need only to counter dry recitations of skeptic science material with assertions about the numbers of «IPCC scientists», declare this to be the settled consensus opinion, then claim there is leaked memo evidence proving skeptics are paid industry money to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» — hoodwink the public, in other words.

«Reposition global warming as theory (not fact),» was the main proposition of a campaign developed in 1991 by a coalition of US coal companies.

This proposed a campaign that would «reposition global warming as a theory (not fact).»

In 1991, EEI and Southern Company spearheaded the Information Council on the Environment ad campaign, which listed as its top strategy an effort to «reposition global warming as theory (not fact).»

When Al Gore authoritatively states «Exxon Mobil has funded 40 different front groups that have all been a part of a strategic persuasion campaign to, in their own words, «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» ``, why is he and others who hurl that accusation not met with a question something similar to «Reposition — what?

And it said that the purpose of the campaign was to reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.

They invested millions of dollars in a disinformation campaign that aimed to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact,» according to an internal strategy memo.

Journalist Ross Gelbspan exposed the corporate campaign in his 1997 book, The Heat Is On, which quoted a 1991 strategy memo: the goal was to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.»

The Information Council on the Environment, which is a coal industry front group, was formed to «reposition global warming as theory (not fact).»

Because the «reposition global warming ``, at first glance, looks like some kind of top - down directive, so much so that Al Gore used it as a literal comparison to an old, essentially undisputed «tobacco industry» directive, not once but twice in a major way.