Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately
estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse
impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse
impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the
impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and
estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions
representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or
impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
To the extent that investment advisers comply with the Fiduciary Rule and PTEs only when the Fiduciary Rule and PTEs are applicable on their original terms and schedule, this
estimate represents a reasonable adjustment of the 2016
estimate to reflect the
impact of the 60 - day delay.
In these maps, each area
represents the final
estimated crater size and location of a collision from roughly that time, with redder spots showing older
impacts and bluer spots younger.
In summary the projections of the IPCC — Met office models and all the
impact studies (especially the Stern report) which derive from them are based on specifically structurally flawed and inherently useless models.They deserve no place in any serious discussion of future climate trends and
represent an enormous waste of time and money.As a basis for public policy their forecasts are grossly in error and therefore worse than useless.For further discussion and an
estimate of the coming cooling see http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com
We
estimate that such a study would need to collect data from roughly 1,800 schools to have the statistical power necessary to detect a.10
impact for any textbook
representing at least 10 percent of the market.
To
estimate the potential
impact of a put option covering notional value (which currently would
represent one S&P 500 index put for a $ 212,664 portfolio), I've
estimated the value of S&P 500 index put options back to 1940 using the Black - Scholes model, imputing volatility prior to the 1980's based on the post-1980 relationship between the CBOE volatility index (VIX) and the volatility, absolute, and directional change in the S&P 500 at each point in time.
Dr. Clower examined the entire domestic supply chain,
estimating direct, indirect and induced economic
impacts to
represent the entire journey of a product in the U.S. (Imported products were not counted as being part of the pet industry's economic
impact until they reached our shores, though they were included in sales figures.)
In other words, the results presented in «Climate change,
impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016»
represent uncertain
estimates due to the reliance on a limited set of data.
Estimates show an annual investment of $ 45 billion is needed to meet universal electrification, but the latest data shows that finance commitments for electricity in these 20 «high -
impact» countries that
represent 80 percent of those without electricity access is less than half that number, averaging just $ 19.4 billion a year.
It is vitally important such processes are accurately
represented in ESMs; for example to provide more reliable
estimates of future drought and heatwave risk, which
impact greatly on society and particularly affect the sustainability goals of many developing countries.
Also, the Greenland ice core data do agree pretty good with sulfate emissions
estimates, but Greenland is located downwind of the US and Canada and does not
represent global trends
impacted by developing countries.
These
estimates include the
impact of pollution originating in other parts of Ontario and the United States and
represent a decrease of 23 % in premature deaths and 41 % in hospitalizations as compared with 2004
estimates.
Consequently, many
impact studies of climate change that ignore land - use and other global change trends (see also Section 4.2.2) may
represent inadequate
estimates of projected ecosystem responses.