In 2013, Former Supreme Court judge Frank Iacobucci, who authored a report on the lack of Indigenous
representation on jury rolls on First Nations reserves, recommended that the Ministry of the Attorney General «undertake a prompt and urgent review» of «using the OHIP database.»
The committee is a response to one of the recommendations of former Supreme Court Justice Frank Iacobucci's 2013 report on aboriginal
representation on juries.
Whatever they do in relation to peremptory challenges, every level of government in Canada should take seriously the recommendations set out by Justice Iacobucci in his 2013 Report to increase Indigenous
representation on juries (summarized at para 44 and para. 374 - 387).
Whatever they do in relation to peremptory challenges, every level of government in Canada should take seriously the recommendations set out by Justice Iacobucci in his 2013 Report to increase Indigenous
representation on juries (summarized at para 44 and paras 374 - 387).
Not exact matches
Following last year's Cannes,
jury member Jessica Chastain was critical about the female
representation on view in that year's films.
The
juried show focuses
on artist
representations of water in a variety of forms.
The panel will oversee the implementation of seventeen recommendations made by former Chief Justice Frank Iacobucci in his report «First Nations
Representation on Ontario
Juries».
Such research is based
on fair
representation of the case and of the kinds of people who sit
on real
juries.
Cassandra Porter and Natai Shelsen review the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in R v. Kokopenace, a case dealing with the under -
representation of Aboriginal people
on jury rolls.
Criminal Law:
Jury Representation R. v. Kokopenace, 2015 SCC 28 (35475) Representativeness focuses on the process used to compile the jury roll, not its ultimate composition, and the state satisfies the right to a representative jury by providing a fair opportunity to participate in the jury process; and that happens where the state makes reasonable efforts to: (1) compile the roll using random selection from lists drawing from a broad cross-section (2) deliver jury notices to those who have been randomly selec
Jury Representation R. v. Kokopenace, 2015 SCC 28 (35475) Representativeness focuses
on the process used to compile the
jury roll, not its ultimate composition, and the state satisfies the right to a representative jury by providing a fair opportunity to participate in the jury process; and that happens where the state makes reasonable efforts to: (1) compile the roll using random selection from lists drawing from a broad cross-section (2) deliver jury notices to those who have been randomly selec
jury roll, not its ultimate composition, and the state satisfies the right to a representative
jury by providing a fair opportunity to participate in the jury process; and that happens where the state makes reasonable efforts to: (1) compile the roll using random selection from lists drawing from a broad cross-section (2) deliver jury notices to those who have been randomly selec
jury by providing a fair opportunity to participate in the
jury process; and that happens where the state makes reasonable efforts to: (1) compile the roll using random selection from lists drawing from a broad cross-section (2) deliver jury notices to those who have been randomly selec
jury process; and that happens where the state makes reasonable efforts to: (1) compile the roll using random selection from lists drawing from a broad cross-section (2) deliver
jury notices to those who have been randomly selec
jury notices to those who have been randomly selected.
In a case demonstrating the challenges of addressing aboriginal
representation on Ontario
juries, the Ontario Superior Court has rejected an application to have a sheriff found guilty of fraud, partiality or wilful misconduct over the lack of First Nations members
on the panel.
The issue in Kokopenace was the under -
representation of Aboriginal people
on jury rolls, and the nature and extent of the state's duty to address that problem.
The discriminatory practices of judges, attorneys and
juries have been documented as contributing to the disproportionate
representation of African - Americans in the justice system (e.g. Leadership Conference
on Civil Rights, 2000).