Sentences with phrase «represents real climate change»

represent real climate change or an artifact of homogenization?

Does the new graph by NASA's Gavin Schmidt's represent real climate change or an artifact of homogenization?

Not exact matches

«Given the scientific consensus that climate change represents a real threat, we might expect the IPCC report to exhibit a more assertive style, yet they don't,» said Medimorec.

But there are also many spurious signals in the data record which scientists must beware of treating as if they represented climate changes in the real world.»

Visitors will use iPads to overlay visualizations onto a 3D printed coral centerpiece, triggered by real - time hashtags on twitter that represent the views of environmentalists and climate - change deniers alike.

It's not that Nate revealed himself to be a climate change denier; He accepts that human - caused climate change is real, and that it represents a challenge and potential threat.

If you can't keep up with annual - decadal changes in the TOA radiative imbalance or ocean heat content (because of failure to correctly model changes in the atmosphere and ocean due to natural variability), then your climate model lacks fidelity to the real world system it is tasked to represent.

So read the brief, vague, but welcome resolution on «environmental stewardship» introduced today by Representative Chris Gibson, a Republican representing New York's 19th Congressional District who has long had to woo Democrats to keep his seat, and has said human - driven climate change is real and needs to be addressed.

Away from the debate that only exists in Mann et al's heads — of one side representing the proposition «climate change is real», and the other side denying it — it seems that there is a widespread view that planet has warmed, slightly.

Even worse, the models inadequately include the diverse myraid effects of aerosols and land use / land cover change on the climate system, so they are already hindered in their ability to accurately represent the real world spectrum of human climate forcings.

Why it is that scientists are convinced by the evidence by multiple independent lines of evidence that human caused climate change is real and it represents a risk.

Mann added that 49 people out of tens of thousands of former and current NASA employees is just a tiny fraction, and that «NASA's official stance, which represents the full current 16,000 NASA scientists and employees, is clear if you go to their website or look at their official publications: human - caused climate change is real, and it represents a challenge we must confront.»

«It would seem that Richard Muller has served as a useful foil for the Koch Brothers, allowing them to claim they have funded a real scientist looking into the basic science, while that scientist — Muller — props himself up by using the «Berkeley» imprimatur (U.C. Berkeley has not in any way sanctioned this effort) and appearing to accept the basic science, and goes out on the talk circuit, writing Op - Eds, etc. systematically downplaying the actual state of the science, dismissing key climate - change impacts and denying the degree of risk that climate change actually represents.

«Carbon offsets involve fundamental tradeoffs and may not be a reliable long - term approach to climate change mitigation,» the report said, adding: «It is not possible to ensure that every credit represents a real, measurable and long - term reduction in emissions.»

He said that while climate change represents a «real but modest threat,» we don't have the technologies needed to make the shift off of fossil fuels, and should abandon mitigation in favor of building energy and climate resilience.