He offers a five - stage history of post-World War II American foreign policy, explaining the rationale for U.S. support of
repressive military regimes, the shift toward advancing empire through globalized capitalist expansion, and the current drive for global military supremacy.
Tens of thousands of students and then doctors, monks, and ordinary Burmese took to the streets, demanding an end to
the repressive military regime led by Ne Win.
Not exact matches
Many of them do not understand that the threat of catastrophic judgment is brought on by their nation as nation and by its vested interests: neglect of the least privileged in this country and beyond, economic exploitation, popular media saturated in violence, the support of
repressive client
regimes,
military buildup and the corporate destruction of the environment.
The reaction among scholars, activists, journalists, bloggers and PanAfricanists was immediate in identifying the inaccuracies, exaggerations and oversimplifications, which addresses «crimes... from a bygone era» as a tool to cultivate American
military support (read intervention) for the Ugandan government, «a
repressive dictatorial
regime» responsible for looting, rape and atrocities in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Yet
military buyers were invited from some of the world's most violent and
repressive regimes, including Colombia, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and China, currently subject to a United Nations arms embargo.