Sentences with phrase «reputable journals»

The quality of journals even for supposedly reputable journals are going down.

It is disturbing to see the attention this book has received from the secular press, including reputable journals.

He has come out with Thirty - three (33) publications including books and academic articles in reputable journals throughout the world some of which have been translated into Portuguese and Spanish.

Suppose that a group of people were attempting to insert a false narrative into as many reputable journals as possible.

In this forum, credibility comes from referencing reputable sources, preferably the primary literature published in reputable journals.

The exploit is particularly damaging because the Web address continues to be endorsed by lists of reputable journals such as Web of Science, curated by Thomson Reuters.

Each article (published in reputable journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association, Contraception, Sex Education) comes to the same conclusion: easier access to EBC seems to have no significant impact on teenage or unwanted pregnancy orabortion rates.

Lanza says that this time, he aims to do things right: direct good science focused on treating disease, publish in reputable journals with rigorous peer - review processes and work with high - quality collaborators and clinical centres for its trials.

For those of you who don't know me, I am a scientist by training and have published several peer - reviewed studies in highly reputable journals (and am also the author of a multi-award-winning book).

Climate is far more complicated than the world economy, yet supposedly reputable journals are publishing papers that superficially look like science, but which are the sort of thing scientists will speculate about late at night over a few beers.

The internet is already full of these unproven claims — so if you are going to propagate facts, let» s avoid the «alternative facts» (i.e. BS) and stick with quoting real results — with references — to properly sized, well - controlled, double blind - ed and peer reviewed studies published in a reputable journal).

Today, reputable journals in every scientific discipline have guidelines for authorship, but the protocols still haven't exactly stabilized, and they rarely address author order

«Most academics in Iraq don't have international experience, they're not good in English, and they don't have the facilities and technology needed to do good research and get published in reputable journals, so they turn to these fake journals with no peer review,» Al - Handal explains.

In a 2003 email, Mann discusses encouraging colleagues to «no longer submit [papers] to, or cite papers in» Climate Research, after it published papers by known sceptics «that couldn't get published in a reputable journal».

Short, letter - type papers or technical notes in reputable journals are an excellent format to get your name attached to your ideas in a timely fashion.

«I knew I could publish in reputable journals in my field and build a strong research group regardless of how the university functioned, unless they interfered with my professional space.»

Any readers browsing through a recent issue of the reputable Journal of the American Medical Association might be surprised by one of the advertising campaigns.

He has published more than 20 peer - reviewed papers in reputable journals and book chapters in the fields of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, cancer research, cardiovascular disease, embryonic stem cell (ESC) and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) research, and human genomics, genetics and development, and Microbiology.

They insist too for her work to be peer reviewed by a reputable journal.

First, it was conducted by a respected researcher and published in a reputable journal.

A Google scholar search for teleconnections finds a pile of highly - cited publications in reputable journals — are you saying Judith that these are all new age nonsense, including the ones where you are an author?

btw, i failed to mention in my above post that i believe, a recent article published by distinguished climatologists in a reputable journal postulates, based on good evidence, that the entire thesis of «co2 as the cause of global warming» is entirely bogus:

I generally agree with David Ropeik (albeit with a bit less drama) that the overall communication is highly suspect and would be amazed if it gets published at a reputable journal (and the «it's too important to wait for peer review» comment is particularly troubling).

Indeed, it is shoddy to issue press releases about studies that have not passed peer review and have not been accepted for publication by a reputable journal.

It seems the obvious task now is to publish this in a reputable journal since I would presume this to be a prerequisite to gaining the attention of climate modellers.

If there are a good many studies in reputable journals (somewhere in J - school they must have studied this?)

He expects us to believe that he has a world - changing theory that, if confirmed, would make him a household name and earn him a fortune as the poster - boy for the fossil - fuel industry, and he has been working on this theory for 16 years while the rest of the world has been barking up the wrong scientific tree... but no, he could not be bothered spending the few hours needed to format his work for submission to a reputable journal.

Good luck finding a reputable journal to publish in Ryan O, or someone to review your paper — you clearly can not be trusted.

Nothing is or can be «suppressed» by some conspiratorial coterie; but only work of reasonable quality and veracity tends to get through the peer review filter and be published in reputable journals.

Now a reputable journal like Science only sells because it's alarmist.