Sentences with phrase «reputations as editors»

As for peer review, it means only that reasonably qualified scientists examined the manuscript and recommended changes to improve the paper, or recommended that the paper be rejected; the journal editor has to make a determination about the merits of the paper based largely, but not entirely on the reviewers» comments (the editor has some discretion in deciding to accept or reject — his / her reputation as an editor, and the reputation of the journal, depend on sound editorial judgments).

which gave me a good reputation as an editor.

Not exact matches

Editor's Note: Stuart Kauffman has a well - earned reputation as a scientific provocateur, albeit one with the weight of data and wisdom on his side.

Decisions regarding suitability of advertising are based upon the editorial integrity and reputation of AMP's journals and websites, and must be in keeping with the mission and principles of AMP as determined by the respective Editorial Boards and Editors.

Mark Brooks, editor of Online Personals Watch and president of the Internet Dating Executive Alliance, sees the Scamalytics network alliance as an important step toward boosting the reputation and popularity of online dating and people discovery sites: «Scammer abuse is still the bane of the internet dating industry and so it's great to see Cupid, a discerning public company, working with Nick and his team to beat scammer abuse.»

Made when director Brian Singer was a mere 27 years old, «The Usual Suspects» has deservedly maintained a reputation as a solid piece of filmmaking, and its success lies in a beautifully written script by Christopher McQuarrie, skilled direction from then - newcomer Singer, and amazing editing from versatile composer / editor John Ottman.

SENIOR MOTORSPORTS EDITOR MAC MORRISON: I, too, sometimes walk a fine line with my opinion of the M3, Lime Rock Park Edition or otherwise, because as my colleagues note, it's a long way removed from the small, light and nimble precursors that forged its longstanding and outstanding reputation from the mid -»80s until the E90's introduction in 2007.

They have a track record and a reputation that most publishers not only recognize, but more and more require as editors of choice.

You need to hire a professional editor in order to prepare your manuscript (this is the highest expense, and it is mandatory — unless you want to look awful and wreck your reputation as an author).

There are plenty of Indie published books edited by former editors from Big 5 publishers as well as by other highly trained freelance professional editors, with the resulting works enhancing the author's reputation and possibly the sales of their next book.

I was well on my way to establishing a reputation as an indie book editor — all because of my website.

In fact, there are several bestselling authors who pay for some «light editing» before sending it to their publishing house's editor in order to preserve their reputations as literary geniuses.

Assuming good faith is why journal editors generally have trouble detecting actual fraud; everybody makes mistakes, and the reputation of academia is that they do not do as good a job checking for errors in programs as do the pharmaceutical companies, who have independent contractors test their programs.

Publishers were interested in securing the reputation of their journals by having distinguished editors and boards, as well as reasonably high rejection rates, while recovering their costs - plus by maintaining the exclusivity of their intellectual property.