At
the request of the plaintiffs in both cases, the Court stated that it would appoint a special five - judge panel to hear the two appeals and reconsider the issues raised by Timminco.
In order to ensure the enforcement of the judgement, the court can, upon
the request of the plaintiff, make an order to preserve the defendant's properties.
Not exact matches
DOL filed a motion Friday
requesting that the three lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of Texas be consolidated; the
plaintiffs agreed to consolidation but insisted that each
of the cases be allowed to «retain their separate identities» and move forward «expeditiously.»
DOL filed a
request on June 20 that the three lawsuits pending in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of Texas be consolidated; the
plaintiffs agreed to consolidation but insisted that each
of the cases be allowed to «retain their separate identities» and move forward «expeditiously.»
Plaintiff further states that the proper instrument to govern the exercise
of the 1st Defendant's vested discretionary power to charge fees or to
request of a deposit
of fees for the general elections 2016, ought to be a statutory instrument and not a constitutional instrument.
Plaintiff states again that 2nd Defendant has not said a word against this marauding show
of power without any legal justification by the 1st Defendant's
request of a deposit
of filing fees for the 2016 Presidential and Parliamentary Elections thereby embolden 1st Defendant in perpetuating these obvious illegalities against the political parties and individual candidates in this 2016 general elections.
Lawyer for the
Plaintiffs Samson Lardy Anyenini said he was ready to grant the two - week
request even though it was obvious the EC had «gone to sleep since the passage
of the law and always resorted to the rhetoric
of «we are implementing it.»»
The state Senate approved a bill that would require a public agency that is sued over a Freedom
of Information Law
request pay attorneys» fees
of the person or entity who sued when the
plaintiffs prevail.
The
request by the
plaintiff, which was vehemently objected to by lawyers
of the NPP, was eventually granted by the court.
In today's lawsuit, the
plaintiffs invoke a section
of FOIA that requires agencies to make publicly available electronically all records that it has released under FOIA which «because
of the nature
of the subject matter, the agency determines have become or are likely to become the subject
of subsequent
requests for substantially the same records.»
The suit now goes back to the lower court, which must reconsider its rejection
of the
plaintiffs»
request for a motion to block federal funding
of ESC research.
Crucially, the Court declined the
plaintiffs»
request to overturn a 1977 ruling in Abood v. Detroit Board
of Education that allowed teachers unions to collect agency fees from nonmembers for costs related to «collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment purposes» but forbid them to use such funds for political or ideological purposes.
Last Monday, just two weeks before the scheduled opening
of school, the U.S Court
of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in St. Louis denied the black
plaintiffs»
request to halt the new plan.
In the state
of Washington, adequacy
plaintiffs filed a new lawsuit in early 2007 that is expected to rely heavily on a report prepared at the
request of a gubernatorial - appointed commission, Washington Learns.
Then Maryland state superintendent Nancy Grasmick decided to join the
plaintiffs in successfully
requesting that a court - appointed oversight team be permitted to review Walter Amprey's appointments above the rank
of teacher.
The
plaintiff's attorney, Arthur Benson, and his expert witnesses assured Judge Clark that if he ordered the
requested improvements the school district would draw tens
of thousands
of white students from the suburbs back into the district.
The case — Houston Federation
of Teachers et al. v. Houston ISD — was filed in 2014 and just yesterday, United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Wm. Smith denied in the United States District Court, Southern District
of Texas, the district's
request for summary judgment given the
plaintiffs» due process claims.
In it, the Charter School
Plaintiffs also
requested additional and amended Findings
of Fact and Conclusions
of Law.
has
requested $ 10,000 personal damages for every time Ms. Rice endorses / d the hate website publicly since the email exchange between she and the
plaintiff in May
of 2014.
After being found guilty
of violating antitrust laws by a US District Judge in 2013 and by an Appeals court in 2015, Apple's
request for an appeal to the US Supreme Court was denied this past March, forcing it to settle with the
plaintiffs.
That often leads to default judgements, or awards
of nearly the amount
requested by the
plaintiff.
Both the
plaintiffs and the defendant were
requesting that the high court rule on the subject
of amateurism.
The format was straightforward — two hours each for the
plaintiffs and the defendants, and the judge had provided us with a series
of questions on the essential physics that he wanted addressed, as well as
requesting a timeline
of how our understanding
of climate change has evolved over the past 150 years.
Has the
plaintiff responded to defense demands for interogatories,
requests for depositions and the other requirements
of the Discovery process?
Because the charge
of defamer is so damaging, Defendant Steyn has taken this process seriously... On February 12th, he responded to Dr Mann's
Requests for Discovery, and is looking forward to
Plaintiff reciprocating.
It seems as though «Michael» was looking for a little quid pro quo in the form
of naughty photos
of plaintiff Jamie Nelson, and said her
request to reverse an erroneous transaction could be expedited if the two could have some «photo fun.»
Plaintiffs served on Bluford both a
request for production
of documents and a set
of interrogatories.
In Seedlings Life Science Ventures, LLC v. Pfizer Canada Inc. 2017 FC 826, the
plaintiff and funder (Bentham IMF Canada)
requested court approval
of the funding agreement.
Finding that the defense would be unjustly prejudiced by allowing the case to proceed toward a jury trial without permitting the defendant's expert to examine the
plaintiff as the
plaintiff's own expert had, the appellate court granted the writ
of mandamus, forcing the lower court to honor the defendant's
request.
Where a case is governed by Case Management (as the
plaintiffs were
requesting here), a single Master gets appointed to hear all motions and deal with the scheduling
of the case - the goal being to have a Master who is familiar with the matter be involved throughout, to prevent a party from causing unnecessary delays (either intentionally or unintentionally).
The amount
of fees was reasonable given that the lower court reduced the
requested fees by 40 % to eliminate an award to
plaintiff on unsuccessful claims.
Although containing a set
of what the Judge called «a freakishly complicated set
of facts,» the decision provides useful guidance to insurers about what to do in the face
of a
Plaintiff who resists a
request for repayment.
On appeal, the
plaintiffs»
requested that the judgment dismissing the action against Mr. Vicentini and Ford Credit be set aside and liability be apportioned equally between those two defendants and Mr. Hoang and
requested that the amount
of damages be increased.
In denying the
plaintiff's
request for a new trial, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals ruled that instructions incorporating a legal analysis on the shifting burdens
of proof in employment discriminbation cases established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973 is appropriate when a trial court judge «translate [s] it into everyday parlance and fit [s] it to the facts and circumstancews
of a particular case.»
This
request was prompted by a case where the majority
of the
plaintiffs» $ 5 million award was split by their lawyers and Sydney - based LCM Litigation Funding.
The Beaver County Times reports that the details
of the settlement were unavailable but that the
plaintiff had been seeking in excess
of $ 300,000 once she was informed that she allegedly received a different type
of breast implants than the ones she had
requested.
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, dismissing a defendant application
requesting the production
of a
Plaintiff's Facebook postings, Twitter postings, Computer Hard Drive and Iphone.
-- authored by Circuit Judge Hurwitz [majority decision] and concurring opinion by Circuit Judge Reinhardt; discussed in our Oct. 10, 2015 post: District court in Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act case which substantially reduced fee
request was reversed based upon its reliance on inapt practice area hourly rates, upon its discounts for
plaintiff's attorneys not delegating tasks to associates given that only small firms prosecuted these type
of cases, and upon its use
of stale prior fee awards involving fee claimant's attorneys.
In the second half
of 2016, many «show cause» status hearings were
requested in order that
plaintiffs could avoid the automatic dismissal
of their actions by the registrar on January 1, 2017.
Bill
of Costs Bill
of Costs (Tariff Items) Consent Form 18 Requisition — General Form 41 Subpoena Form 52.2 Certificate Concerning Code
of Conduct for Expert Witnesses Form 80A Affidavit Form 91 Direction to Attend Form 124A Notice
of change
of solicitor Form 146A1 Affidavit
of service Form 146A2 Affidavit
of service — Personal Service Form 146B Solicitor's Certificate
of Service Form 149 Tender
of Payment into Court Form 171A Statement
of claim Form 171B Statement
of defence Form 171C Reply Form 171D Counterclaim against parties to main action only Form 171E Counterclaim against
plaintiff and person not already party to the main action Form 171F Defence to Counterclaim Form 171G Reply to defence to counterclaim Form 171H Third Party Claim against a person already party to the action Form 171I Third Party Claim against a person not already party to the action Form 171J Third Party Defence Form 171K Reply to Third Party Defence From 223 Affidavit
of Documents Form 255
Request to Admit Form 256 Response to
Request to Admit Form 258
Request for Pre-Trail Conference Form 301 Notice
of Application Form 305 Notice
of Appearance — Application Form 314 Requisition for Hearing — Application Form 337 Notice
of Appeal Form 341A Notice
of Appearance — Appeal Form 344 Certificate
of Completeness
of Appeal Book Form 347 Requisition for Hearing — Appeal Form 359 Notice
of Motion Memorandum
of Fact and Law Model Bifurcation Order Model Jeopardy Order Motion Record Notice
of Consent to Electronic Service Solicitor's Certificate
of Expert Witness
As America's most - cited judge, Judge Richard Posner, put it last year, «Judges have difficulty understanding modern technology and jurors have even greater difficulty, yet patent
plaintiffs tend to
request trial by jury because they believe that jurors tend to favor patentees, believing that they must be worthy inventors defending the fruits
of their invention against copycats -LSB-...]».
Given the lack
of precedent on the issue, the
plaintiff's counsel took a risk making this
request.
Still, apparently Merck still opposed the
plaintiffs» most recent offer to accept 50 percent
of the $ 5.6 million
requested.
After all, if Merck spent $ 10 million defending against the components
of the Vioxx claim related to consumer fraud, how can it possibly begrudge the
plaintiffs lawyers»
request for half that amount?
To avoid disclosing how much it has spent on legal fees, Merck has agreed to drop some
of its objections to
plaintiffs» fee
request.
Research also suggests that
plaintiffs» damage
requests influence juries» assessments
of appropriate awards.
Each
of those points must be clearly established by the
plaintiff's evidence in the
request for the order.
Appellate Court Reverses Lower Court's Denial
of Plaintiff's
Request to Extend Notice Deadline, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog, published January 19, 2017.
Of course, this result was in harmony with common practice among plaintiffs and medical lien holders; plaintiff's counsel typically requested and received reductions in the liens of insurers and hospital
Of course, this result was in harmony with common practice among
plaintiffs and medical lien holders;
plaintiff's counsel typically
requested and received reductions in the liens
of insurers and hospital
of insurers and hospitals.
The Trial Judge agreed with Mr. Abraham's assessment
of the damages under all headings and awarded the
Plaintiffs at the exact amounts
requested.