Sentences with phrase «require abortion providers»

Six of these states (AL, ID, IN, KS, MO and OK), all of which adopted restrictions on abortions performed later in pregnancy (see above), moved to require abortion providers to report a diagnosis when an abortion is performed at or beyond 20 weeks» gestation.

Legislation to require abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges was introduced in five states and enacted in three; this provision is not mandated for other outpatient surgical and medical providers.

In addition, laws adopted in Louisiana and Oklahoma require abortion providers to make the fetal heartbeat audible to the woman prior to an abortion.

Some states require abortion providers to provide women with written or verbal information suggesting that abortion increases a woman's risk of breast cancer or mental illness, despite the lack of valid scientific evidence of increased risk.

The North Carolina provision requires abortion providers who believe that a woman might be the victim of domestic violence to provide her with information about available social services.

The other three new provisions (in AZ, FL and KS), all of which are in effect, require the abortion provider to offer the woman the opportunity to view the image or listen to a verbal description of it.

«As the County Board of Health pointed out, there is no public health value, nor support from the medical community, including the medical professionals on that Board, for a county ordinance requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges.»

The Arizona legislature recently enacted a law requiring abortion providers to follow an outdated FDA protocol for medication abortion that is more than 15 years old — and the governor signed it just days after the FDA updated its protocol.

Not exact matches

According to the ethics report, physicians objecting to abortion or contraception must refer patients desiring such services to other providers (recommendation # 4); may not argue or advocate their views on these matters though they are required to provide prior notice to their patients of their moral commitments (recommendation # 3); and, in emergency cases or in situations that might negatively affect patient physical or mental health, they must actually provide contraception and / or perform abortions (recommendation # 5, emphasis added).

The 2011 law requires providers to stick to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines for abortion by medication.

These regulations may prohibit qualified providers from performing abortions, misinform women of the risks of the procedures they are considering, or require medically unnecessary services and delay care, the report says.

Today the women's health care providers who jointly filed suit last month on behalf of their patients have filed an emergency application with the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate an injunction granted by U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel on October 28 blocking a Texas provision requiring doctors who provide abortions to obtain admitting privileges at a local hospital — a requirement that leading medical associations oppose and only results in women losing access to safe medical care.

This policy requires doctors who object to providing medical care on the basis of religious or conscientious grounds (such as medical assistance in dying, abortion, birth control and gender confirmation surgery) to connect the patient with a person or agency who will either provide care or connect the patient with a willing provider of the service requested.

This policy requires doctors who object to providing medical care on the basis of religious or conscientious grounds (such as medical assistance in dying — «MAID» — but also abortion, birth control and gender confirmation surgery) to connect the patient with a person or agency who will either provide care or connect the patient with a willing provider of the service requested.

A new provision in Texas requires that women who live less than 100 miles from an abortion provider obtain counseling in person at the facility at least 24 hours in advance.

Kansas and Indiana moved to require that abortion providers have admitting privileges at a local hospital, something that has proven difficult to obtain in other states, often because of antipathy toward abortion providers.

Providers that offer abortion services or are affiliated with a provider that does so would be ineligible, as would any entity that makes abortion referrals — a direct violation of the federal regulations governing the Title X program, which require Title X — funded sites to offer nondirective pregnancy - options counseling and referral.

The new law in Virginia also requires providers to give women the option to hear a fetal heartbeat in advance of having an abortion.

Abortion providers in Texas are required to notify a parent, legal guardian or custodian of a minor's decision to have an aAbortion providers in Texas are required to notify a parent, legal guardian or custodian of a minor's decision to have an abortionabortion.

For several years, Ohio has required that abortion providers maintain a written transfer agreement with a local public hospital.

SB 1722 / HB 1411 significantly impacts women's access to abortion care with over 10 changes to current regulations by requiring medically unnecessary admitting privileges or transfer agreements for abortion providers.

In Arizona, the legislature has amended state law to require that providers follow the regimen outlined on the old label for medication abortion, regardless of scientific evidence and the new FDA - approved label.

The rule tossed out by Trump required state and local governments to distribute federal dollars for family planning services, including contraception, sexually transmitted diseases, fertility, pregnancy care and breast and cervical cancer screening, to qualified health providers, irrespective of whether the providers also performed abortions.

These onerous and medically unnecessary regulations on abortion providers include requiring that hallways in a health center measure a certain width.

In August, lawmakers passed legislation requiring insurance providers to fully cover all reproductive health services — including abortion.

Require providers to inform a woman seeking an abortion whether the abortion provider has admitting privileges at a nearby hospital as well as medical malpractice insurance (Kansas)