Successful ICBC personal injury claims
require expert medical opinions, especially in the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
Not exact matches
A handful of
medical Google Glass start - ups have been launched, including Remedy, which allows a doctor to live - stream a patient meeting to a specialist when an
expert opinion is
required.
Physician's
opinions as to present and future
medical care and treatment will be
required, as well elder care
experts that are involved in hospice regarding surviving and thriving.
An effective claim will
require an in - depth investigation and
medical expert opinions.
In the court's
opinion, the three - judge panel found that Illinois law
requires the «622» affidavit from a health care
expert in a suit alleging
medical malpractice and that failure to do so is grounds for dismissal.
That rule — which
requires expert witnesses to, among other things, back up their
medical opinion with facts and research — applies only to litigation witnesses who were hired by parties to provide
opinion and not participant witnesses like treating physicians, the court found.
This is accomplished by building a case based on the plaintiff's entire
medical, social and employment history, retaining well - respected
experts who are provided with all information
required to provide a fully informed
opinion and ensuring that the plaintiff is fully prepared for the discovery process.
In Bottiglia v. Ottawa Catholic School Board, 2017 ONSC 2517, the Ontario Divisional Court held that an employee's duty to accommodate may permit, or even
require, the employer to ask for a second
medical opinion where the employer has a reasonable and bona fide reason to question the adequacy and reliability of the information provided by its employee's
medical expert.
Often, this will
require a thorough investigation into what happened and
require the
opinions of
medical experts.
Requires that a
medical liability case must be dismissed without prejudice unless the claimant obtains an admissible
expert opinion within three months of commencement of the action or a date determined by the court.
When patients make claims of negligence the process of discovering whether negligence occurred
requires investigating
medical records, interviewing the involved parties (through sworn depositions), finding
experts, sorting out conflicts between the
opinions of
experts, reinvestigating the records and testimony as new insights are uncovered and then reaching some kind of consensus, if possible, about what actually occurred and whether those facts meet the definition of legal negligence.