Sentences with phrase «require human decisions»

I would define «quant» or a «quantitative system» as a strategy that does not require human decisions (discretion) at the level of execution.

Not exact matches

Certainly, though, a superior level of humanity will be required to make wide - ranging decisions and consistently act in the best interest of actual humans involved in work - related encounters in fully automated environments.

CMOs and CSOs, to make sound informed decisions, require new perspectives on buyer goals and the human side of businesses.

Also, trading often requires one to react in a way which is adverse to human nature, to be out ahead of the crowd, sometimes with little on which to base the decision.

Perhaps pursuit of the maximal human creativity should be constrained by the following principle of environmental respect: A purpose that reduces natural creativity relative to some alternative for the decision in question is a violation of the maximal divine good unless the purpose is required in order to maximize human creativity in the long run.8 All implications considered, I expect that maximizing human creativity itself includes adherence to this principle.

Maybe I'm too cynical, but the best sense I can make of the administrations decisions requires me to presuppose the predominance of (1) dreamy human rights internationalism, and (2) cynical efforts to keep the Middle East out of domestic politics by doing whatever it takes to kick the various cans down the road.

An enduring and progressive democracy rests on common loyalty to a law of truth and right which is found and given, not constructed by human decision; and for the propagation and health of such democracy an educational system centered around this religious principle is required.

Artificial Intelligence (AI), according to the Oxford English Dictionary, focuses on the study of «computer systems able to perform tasks normally requiring human intelligence — such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision - making, and translation between languages».

The vocation to serve human need thus requires moral decisions in scientific work.

Human freedom requires not only that the decision be identified as the person's own reality but that the decision have a free range over significant options.

We humans have «life,» «decision» «subjectivity,» and «enjoyment» only in the process of concrescence.7 Thus, creativity's role in accounting for the concrescence of an actual entity has a certain priority over its role in accounting for the transition between actual entities, although a full understanding of either role requires reference to the other.

Good decision making requires access to pertinent information, recognition that in practice facts are not value - free, a human sensitivity to values, uncommon sensibilities and common - sense.

While you focus on the tasks that require distinctly human creativity and persistence, let the machines be your support system that guides the more involved decisions.

The real concern lies with futuristic technologies that will rely on artificial intelligence and no longer require routine input from human decision - makers.

One means of accomplishing that would be to include lab chiefs» safety records among the materials submitted in grant proposals (and weighed in funding decisions), alongside currently required materials such as human subjects and vertebrate - care documentation.

Because decision - strategies that require widespread agreement lie at the very basis of the evolution of human cooperation, people may be biologically wired to pay attention to consensus - data.

Hrdy maintains that a human infant is so costly to raise — requiring 13 million calories to attain adulthood — that mothers since the Pleistocene Epoch have made calculated decisions about when, how, and whether to rear them.

The standard of political and moral performance required to consider should be the following: 1) increase of solidarity among the inhabitants of the country; 2) increase in the practice of social justice by organs of government and civil society; 3) increase in the distribution of income and wealth among the population; 4) increase of measures to preserve and care for nature; 5) increase in policies for integral development of education in accordance with the highest human values; 6) advances in the realization of the collective will of the citizens; 7) improvement of political institutions; 8) success in combating corruption measured by its reduction; 9) increase in the exercise of citizenship with the effective participation of citizens in government decisions and fight for expansion of their rights; and 10) increase of contribution of public and private organizations to the political, economic, social and environmental development of the country.

Google defines AI as «the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks normally requiring human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision - making, and translation between languages».

As discussed in connection with the previous two inferences, the state test and beliefs about students both appeared to be contributing factors to the LSG's decision to pose problems requiring a minimum human element.

Some lenders, ranging from traditional banks to online platforms, say they have no intention of using artificial intelligence technology — computer systems performing tasks that normally require human intelligence — in loan decisions.

Barron's recently did a cover story on it called The New Face of Financial Advice and highlighted 4 robo portfolio services including, Betterment, who launched in 2010, Wealthfront, who launched in 2011, and two recent entries Charles Schwab Intelligent Portfolios, and a hybrid Vanguard Personal Advisor Services, which requires the involvement of a human financial advisor to provide what Vanguard calls «behavioral coaching» to prevent clients from making those bad market timing decisions.

A healthy human — animal bond requires a two - way exchange, and when that exchange is gone, the time for humane euthanasia has arrived (See «End of Life Decisions» for further reading).

Attainment of the Millennium Development Goals, particularly the first goal of eradicating extreme poverty and hunger, in the face of climate change will therefore require science that specifically considers food insecurity as an integral element of human vulnerability within the context of complex social, economic, political and biophysical systems, and that is able to offer usable findings for decision - makers at all scales.

As the federal government's most comprehensive assessment of the harmful impacts of climate change on human health and public welfare in the United States, this report, years in the making, should have been used in developing EPA's required «endangerment» finding as a step toward regulating greenhouse gases, instead of keeping the work of the Climate Change Science Program disconnected from this decision support role.

Thus, for example, in the present case the president of the Queen's Bench Division observed: «Courts and Tribunals acting judicially are generally required to give reasons for their decisions, and further normally required to publish them for the proper public administration of justice so as to comply with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.»

A number of technologies under the umbrella of artificial intelligence, such as machine learning, natural language processing, experts systems (the ability to emulate decision - making of a human expert) and others, allow computers to perform things that normally require human intelligence.

As many EU regulators require a fully - fledged decision making unit through proper governance, the analysis of the changes in delegation of authority schemes and the assessment of potential human resources impacts must be considered early on in the process.

An Ontario Human Rights Tribunal decision has found that it is humiliating to require a trans woman to be strip searched by a male officer against her wishes.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has been clear that the failure to compensate for loss, other than in exceptional circumstances, in relation to this particular right in A1P1 may not conform with the required «fair balance» and proportionality (see Jahn v Germany [2004] ECHR 36 at [93]- [94]; James v UK (1986) Series A No 98, esp at [54]; cf the admissibility decision in Di Palma v UK (1988) 10 EHRR 149 but the ECtHR has clearly moved on since that time).

This decision should allay any fears that employers» expanding obligations with respect to harassment, including under the OHSA and Human Rights Code, do not require managers to change their management style to ensure that their employees constantly feel happy and satisfied with their roles.

By reference to cases including R (SB) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15, Miss Behavin» Ltd v Belfast City Council [2007] UKHL 19, R (Stevens) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2013] EWHC 792 (Admin) and R (Nagre) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 720 (Admin), Hickinbottom J expressed the view that the differences between the approach required by ECHR jurisprudence and the traditional Wednesbury approach could be exaggerated and explained how a court should allow considerable deference to a decision, which on its face properly took into account the human rights engaged.

We are also regularly instructed in high - profile challenges to the decisions of public authorities and regulators, including claims which require urgent applications for interim relief, and which involve complex issues of international, EU or human rights law in the commercial sphere.

In an important decision, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario («HRTO») has emphasized that accommodation is only required where discrimination is first established.

In the United Kingdom High Court (Administrative) decision of DD v Secretary of State for Home Department [2014](«DD») Ouseley J was required to consider, on a preliminary basis, whether the imposition of a Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measure («TPIM»)(the successor of control orders) had violated the appellant's right to freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment under article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights («ECHR»).

«Artificial intelligence» (AI) is a broad term that describes a group of technologies designed to perform tasks that once required human intelligence, interaction, or decision - making.

The key points in the court's decision were as follows: (i) It referred to the High Court's decision in R (AW) v Croydon LBC [2005] EWHC 2950 (Admin), [2005] All ER (D) 251 (Dec) which held that where the fresh grounds for asylum were «manifestly nothing of the sort» then a local authority considering whether an applicant's human rights required accommodation to be provided could in limited cases ignore the purported new claim and operate on the assumption that there is no impediment to the individual leaving the UK.

EPA s. 142.2.1 (5) requires the Tribunal to confirm the Director's decision if it «determines that engaging in the renewable energy project in accordance with the renewable energy approval will not cause [serious harm to human health]».

On 21 November 2012, the Department of Defense of the United States issued its first - ever policy on autonomy in weapons systems, requiring that a human always be «in - the - loop» when decisions are made about using lethal force.

Two days after Losing Humanity was released, the US Department of Defense issued a policy directive that, according to some views, requires a human being to be «in - the - loop» when decisions are made about using lethal force.

This year (2015), the Open Roboethics initiative conducted a survey to better understand public opinions on the question of the ethics and governance of autonomous weapons systems that makes the decision to use lethal force without requiring human intervention and systems in which a person in a remote location makes the decision.

At the Chatham House conference, there were several panelists that were quite open that the value of human dignity required a human in the loop on such a momentous decision as who to kill that the ban should be in place even at a time when fewer civilian casualties would result from use of autonomous weapons.

The job requires a complex skill set, including nursing expertise, human resources training, strong communication and interpersonal skills, problem solving, and decision making.

While Indigenous interests can be represented by non-Indigenous experts, human rights principles require that no decisions affecting native title land should be made without the informed consent of those affected.

More specifically, human rights principles require the development of norms and decision - making processes that:

A human rights approach requires that policy and government decisions relating to the interests of Indigenous people be made only with their effective participation.

To ensure the protection of rights and interests and the opportunity of traditional owners to effectively participate in decisions relating to their land, a human rights approach requires that the Western Australian Government act to protect Indigenous rights and interests in land until the resolution of traditional owner interests in conservation areas and appropriate negotiations can commence.

In its General Comment on article 27 of the ICCPR, the Human Rights Committee stated «With regard to the exercise of the cultural rights protected under article 27... The enjoyment of those rights may require positive legal measures of protection and measures to ensure the effective participation of members of minority communities in decisions which affect them», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities, 8 April 1994, para 7.

Recommendation 3: That the Government provide formal legislative recognition of Aboriginal Customary Law in the Sentencing Act by inserting a new section into the Act which requires magistrates and judges to determine in all matters whether Aboriginal Customary Law is a relevant consideration and if so, to provide appropriate weight to customary law in sentencing decisions and to apply it consistently with human rights standards (as defined in the six human rights treaties to which Australia is a party and through the instruments of the United Nations and under international law).

HREOC considers that it is preferable for judicial decision makers to be required to balance Aboriginal Customary Law issues with human rights standards, rather than imposing a legislative uniform ban or refusing to recognise certain practices.