Sentences with phrase «require little thought»

They just require a little thought and preparation.

There is no singular best in the wide world of car mounted camera devices, and this is a personalized decision that will require a little thought on your behalf.

The boss battles actually require a little thought to beat, but it can be annoying having no obvious solution.

The games boss fights also require a little thought and planning and can definitely take you by surprise, and when you do defeat the boss the encounter ends with a button mashing scene that you just have to experience.

Most of the stories are plain and require little thought for a gamer to comprehend.

There must be a way to see the Big Picture and lighten up on areas that are over-valued, but still enjoy an average return at least approaching that of the market as a whole... I'd love to hear some simple strategies that require a little thought, and don't just focus on keeping a lot of money in cash and short term bonds.

The boss battles actually require a little thought to beat, but it can be annoying having no obvious solution.

The belt, shoes, bag, and jacket colors all come from the blouse's floral pattern... try that and I'm sure you'll love it, it might require a little thought at first but you'll become a natural in no time amigas

What's even better: Those imminent holiday blazes may require little thought, according to a new study.

Requires a little thinking ahead, of course.

It's a move that requires little thought.

Once you get accustomed to the Civic's dimensions, driving the car becomes little more than a reflex action that requires little thought.

Mixing aspects from the twin - stick shooter genre with challenging puzzles that require a little thinking to solve, this game is one that I would highly recommend you spend some time playing.

Combat is like any turn base game and while each character does have individual moves, the option of auto - attacking AKA «go for it» made for a fast combat system that required little thinking.

Finding the suit that's right for you requires a little thought & consideration, as Dale Rhodes explains

It's too easy to be negative about almost everything but for the most part it's a lazy approach that requires little thought and analysis.

Looking for a new job without tipping off your current boss requires a little thought and planning.

Not exact matches

The requisite Monday - Thursday uniform makes dressing a cinch, with little thought required.

«I think all new technologies have an element of being a little bit scary, and I think it's easier to see the downsides than the upsides because the upsides require a lot more imagination, but in every point in the past, new technology has had many more upsides than downsides,» he said.

It lowers your reliance on willpower and motivation because, as Tynan, the author of Superhuman by Habit, says, habits are «action [s] that you take on a repeated basis with little or no required effort or thought.»

If the equity premium puzzle is real and not just luck, there is little reason to think that this generation or future generations will require less expected return for holding nondiversifiable equity risk.

It requires a little more monitoring and thinking, which is great if you have the time and interest.

So, I do think that for people who have accumulated most of their retirement savings within the confines of some sort of traditional tax - deferred account, for the sake of just giving yourself a little bit of flexibility in retirement to not have to take required minimum distributions from the account, to have some withdrawals coming out tax - free, I think the Roth contributions can make sense.

Though it may seem that bond holdings would require very little thought, the opposite is actually true.

I think too many people focus on giving up some trivial thing that has little meaning and requires no real sacrifice.

Mascall thinks that it does, and indeed he seems to regard this as so evident as to require little explanation.

I think this question requires that we dig a little deeper and ask why we need phones.

I think a little self reflection is required.

I tend to think we should have less religion imposed on us from the masses, thus recruiting from the major religions is required, otherwise we get into problems and wars which are heavily faith - based and have little or no humanistic value.

But, if anything, reassessing the religious traditions that you were brought up in, finding it wanting but not wanting to abandon the idea of spirtuality altogether would seem to require just a little more thought than mindlessly adopting the traditions you were brought up with.

A little thought makes one realize that it would have been very difficult, perhaps well - nigh impossible, for one man to carry the body the distance required, and to roll the large round stone against the entrance.

Though he recognizes that what justice requires changes with changing circumstances, his thought about justice is so dominated by a «sense of things fixed» that little if any place is left for personal adaptation in its exercise.

In our more formal sermon - centered services little is required of the worshiper except to sit decorously, stand, and bow his head at appropriate intervals, and rare indeed is the minister who can capture his roving thoughts all the time from eleven o'clock until twelve - fifteen.

This would not require that you relinquish your pacifism, although it might call for a little thought in that regard.

Atheism is the absence of belief and as such requires surprisingly little «practice» after the initial work of thinking critically.

I think it comes from having little sisters who sometimes require things to be cut up into little bits.

It requires a little shaking on your part, but we think it's worth it.

It's these simple recipes that require very little thought or prep that are so enjoyable.

I thought we would kick off the week with a little bit of chocolate (since Monday's usually require some chocolate).

This is one of the few things required for the holiday, I think — American flag dessert, fireworks, and little kids in ridiculous red white and blue outfits.

I think the gluten free bread likes a little more kneading (mixing) than its wheaty cousin requires.

I don't think it requires much wit or imagination to stand back a little and see 3 distinct phases to AW's time at AFC.

I am getting a little pi $ $ ed off with some of the recent articles like this and think an explanation is required, if not from you, from the administrator of this site.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

It just requires a little more thought and a few adjustments After all, preteens are a bit harder to impress than the little ones, and they're looking for activities that are a tad more grown up.

Once babies are older and mobile, your destination and surroundings require a little more thought.

Because they require a little more TLC, you might think the advantages of wool aren't worth the effort.

You think about your baby's safety 24 hours a day — but it's the nine - to - five shift that requires a little extra attention.

As such, I'm finding it a little difficult to do certain types of projects without a second person keeping track of the baby — projects that require deep thought for more than the couple minutes it takes for my baby to cross the room and scale the steps before I need to get up to fetch him.

When I plan my days, I group my desired results into two categories: 1) major results that require a lot of creativity and concentration (e.g. writing, working on presentations) and 2) minor errands that require little or no thinking (e.g. scheduling appointments, paying bills).