Sentences with phrase «require much science»

Atheism doesn't require much science, but does require logic.

Not exact matches

Does it require soo much comprehension *** science is simply an observation of gods creation.

Such cosmologies are almost always «vitalistic» in the sense of requiring auxiliary and somewhat ad hoc hypotheses to account for the apparent violation of the law of entropy in the impetus toward greater complexity manifested in the evolutionary process.6 Evolutionary cosmologies thus perpetuate a much older tradition of Romantic Naturphilosophie far more than providing a fully contemporary philosophy of science or some sort of «scientifically - verified» philosophy.7

I guess I am just lazy, as that would require so much more faith in science.

Over the course of a long career, a Ph.D. in science is pretty much a wash financially, but in the short term, science requires financial sacrifices.

But he faces a high bar: Mann has played a key role in climate science for decades, and the law generally requires a much higher burden of proof from public figures, said CEI general counsel Sam Kazman.

English - proficient foreign - national science trainees in their first 2 years of graduate school are likely to be offered a teaching assistantship instead of a research assistantship, because their lack of experience and training tends to limit their effectiveness in the research lab and because the amount of service required for a teaching assistantship (typically 20 hours / week or fewer... often much fewer) is less than for a research assistantship.

«The day has 24 hours only, and the dedication to research required to [do] a postdoc in physics implies that the other activities are not much more than hobbies,» Castanheira writes in an e-mail to Science Careers.

«Although some aspects of normal state spin electronics, or spintronics, are more efficient than standard semiconductor electronics, the large - scale application has been prevented because the large charge currents required to generate spin currents waste too much energy,» said Professor Mark Blamire of Cambridge's Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, who led the research.

For example, Panetta said, STEM programs that don't require students to declare a major or enter a college of science or engineering when they first enroll seem to have a much higher proportion of underrepresented students, particularly women.

The exciting work in computational neuroscience described in this week's Science Careers and the 6 October Science magazine special issue required financial backing before researchers could get much done.

Although many Greek researchers welcome the new foundation, they say that much more funding is required to revitalize science in their country.

The Brussels Declaration presents a much needed bottom - up approach to science advice that requires broad societal engagement and policy action.»

Garland understands the delicate ingredients for science fiction cinema that doesn't require so much futuristic illusion.

I was fortunate; when I was a kid, it was cool to be an astronaut, which requires so much science.

A proposed law in Tennessee would require science educators to «teach the controversies» regarding evolution and climate change — even though scientists don't think there is much controversy.

To give you a taste of what is coming in Part 2, the arguments can be summarized as: 1) Education does not lend itself to a single «best» approach, so the Gates effort to use science to discover best practices is unable to yield much productive fruit; 2) As a result, the Gates folks have mostly been falsely invoking science to advance practices and policies they prefer for which they have no scientific support; 3) Attempting to impose particular practices on the nation's education system is generating more political resistance than even the Gates Foundation can overcome, despite their focus on political influence and their devotion of significant resources to that effort; 4) The scale of the political effort required by the Gates strategy of imposing «best» practices is forcing Gates to expand its staffing to levels where it is being paralyzed by its own administrative bloat; and 5) The false invocation of science as a political tool to advance policies and practices not actually supported by scientific evidence is producing intellectual corruption among the staff and researchers associated with Gates, which will undermine their long - term credibility and influence.

This means that many school districts are replacing school librarians (professionals with Master's degrees in information science) with paraprofessionals who are not required to have as much as a bachelor's degree.

With a background in the practical application of science as an engineer, and as someone who finds activity requiring any athletic ability beyond hand - eye coordination challenging, Tammy found clicker training much more appealing than the traditional obedience classes.

With a background in the practical application of science as an engineer, and as someone who finds activity requiring any athletic ability beyond hand - eye coordination challenging, Tammy found clicker training much more appealing than the traditional obedience classes available at the time.

On a less hypothetical note, America supports the arts, and it requires that the National Endowment for the Arts follow a process of impartial review by experts, much as mass disbelief in evolution does not govern grants to science.

The opportunities for progress on science and technology related to this topic are immense, but a much larger international effort is required from society and scientists.

Nowadays much of the science being done is interdisciplinary, requiring the formation of teams from various disparate fields — which at times will even have difficulty communicating with each other due to their specialized approaches to viewing problems and even their vocabularies.

So I think rigorous science has much to contribute to understanding AGW and the response if any that might be required.

Climate change presents a profound challenge to this cautious centrism because half measures won't cut it: «all of the above energy» programs, as U.S. President Barack Obama describes his approach, has about as much chance of success as an all of the above diet, and the firm deadlines imposed by science require that we get very worked up indeed.

As others have noted, the IPCC Team has gone absolutely feral about Salby's research and the most recent paper by Dr Roy Spencer, at the University of Alabama (On the Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedbacks from Variations in Earth's Radiant Energy Balance), for one simple reason: both are based on empirical, undoctored satellite observations, which, depending on the measure required, now extend into the past by up to 32 years, i.e. long enough to begin evaluating real climate trends; whereas much of the Team's science in AR4 (2007) is based on primitive climate models generated from primitive and potentially unreliable land measurements and proxies, which have been «filtered» to achieve certain artificial realities (There are other more scathing descriptions of this process I won't use).

Oil and gas pipelines are a typical analogy for the scale and nature of infrastructure required, but have significant differences: the science of fossil fuel reserves was limited when much of the industry was created, and under business - as - usual the price of oil can be expected to rise as reserves go down, thus stretching out the time in which the investment is worthwhile.

Better communication requires that climate science learn from other fields that have done much better (people like Randy Olson, Matt Nisbet study this sort of thing.)

Let me lay out a further deduction for you «experts» who continue to thoughtlessly dismiss the definitive evidence, which is required to correct and advance climate science from this point on, and for the benefit of interested laypersons (and the all - capitals doesn't imply yelling, just what I have learned is a necessary emphasis, to get you to focus upon the facts — YOU ARE INCREDIBLY STUPID, ALL OF YOU, AND YOU DO NOT DESERVE TO CALL YOURSELVES, OR BE EMPLOYED AS, SCIENTISTS, MUCH LESS EXPERTS.

My opinion, which I tell my students, is that knowing the fundamentals, knowing the basics — whatever area you work in, climate economics or ecological sciences — addressing and studying climate change problems requires an interdisciplinary approach and sooner or later that person who is very much well - versed in the fundamentals of his or her own choice of areas will see the avenue directing to the major issue of climate change or climate science.

Setting science - based targets gives companies a clear vision of how much and how quickly they need to transform their businesses in order to be part of the low - carbon economy that's required to prevent the most dangerous impacts of climate change.

There is much work to be done in climate science to reduce the uncertainties or to at least acknowledge when reducing those uncertainties will require some scientific breakthroughs or clearly present a limitation of knowing.

While some bemoan too little data is yet available, or it is too unreliable, or otherwise complain about how reality makes their theory unhappy, Science has always found that where exceptions too much abound, where assumptions lead to failure, where we can not universally apply a formula, our explanation requires amendment.

I suspect that much of the climate science community must be rescued if we are to proceed expeditiously to the understanding of climate that will be required in order make correct and timely policy decisions.

As I believe you know, to accept the IPCCs conclusions and recomendations requires at least as much faith as science — no it requires more faith.

That is why valuing any business, including real estate brokerages, is as much an art as it is a science, and requires an experienced and knowledgeable expert to undertake to ensure nothing is missed.