Knudson, who served as vice chairman of the Assembly Select Common Core Standards Committee, said the bill would
require reviews of standards in regular and advanced math, English, science, social studies and the arts.
Not exact matches
After careful
review and consideration
of the comments, the Department is issuing this final rule that will (1) extend the applicability date
of the Fiduciary Rule, the BIC Exemption, and the Principal Transactions Exemption for 60 days until June 9, 2017, and (2)
require that fiduciaries relying on these exemptions for covered transactions adhere only to the «best interest»
standard and the other Impartial Conduct Standards
of these PTEs during a transition period from June 9, 2017, through January 1, 2018.
Private health insurer NIB Holdings has made no secret
of the fact that it may
require more capital following the prudential regulator's pending
review of capital
standards.
7) The Committee shall
review and consider with the External Auditors the matters
required to be discussed by the applicable
standards of the Public Accounting Oversight Board.
Although subsequent administrations have continued
reviewing vertical mergers, the Chicago School's view that these deals generally do not pose threats to competition has remained dominant.139 Rejection
of vertical tie - ups —
standard through the 1960s and 1970s — is extremely rare today; 140 in instances where agencies spot potential harm, they tend to impose conduct remedies or
require divestitures rather than block the deal outright.141 The Obama Administration took this approach with two
of the largest vertical deals
of the last decade: Comcast / NBC and Ticketmaster / LiveNation.
The Audit Committee
reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2014, the firm's judgments as to the acceptability and quality
of FedEx's accounting principles and such other matters as are
required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)(the «PCAOB»), including those matters
required to be discussed by Auditing
Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees.
A new
standard requiring health care facilities to explain a responsive feeding style to mothers was introduced as part
of the
review of the Baby Friendly Initiative
standards in 2014.
However, nearly 75 %
of coaches were
required to
review concussion information or follow the
standards set by the National Federation
of High School Associations (NFHS).
The bill would
require the EPA to
review the national ambient air quality
standards for each pollutant every ten years, instead
of every five, and would
require the agency to evaluate possible adverse effects
of standard changes.
The U.S. Department
of Transportation also would be
required to
review underride
standards every five years.
«To ensure that researchers and research facilities funded through the DHS [Center
of Excellence] award meet the highest safety
standards possible,» the UCCLS report states, «DHS
requires every recipient to develop a Research Safety Plan» showing, among other things, that the researcher has identified the potential hazards in the research and will use accepted and appropriate protocols and practices; that the institution provides faculty oversight for students and education and training to develop a culture
of safety; and that subject matter experts not involved in the research
review protocols and practices.
The peer
review system
requires that the project address «an important problem,» but some
of the grants «do not seem to meet this
standard,» the letter says.
«However, as the results
of this
review indicate, oftentimes oncofertilty related services are not delivered to the
standard required or in line with patient's needs.
Sponsored submissions are not individually evaluated at the MMRRC's Strain
Reviews and are not
required to meet the same
standards for scientific value
required of unfunded submissions which are preserved using DPCPSI's MMRRC grant funding.
Federal courts have played a key role in the development
of special education policy by interpreting what Congress wrote in IDEA three decades ago, and the Supreme Court is
reviewing what the law means by a «free appropriate public education» as it considers Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which deals with the
standard of services districts are
required to provide (see «Examining the Standards for Special Education» legal beat, Summer 2017).
The NEU also states that more robust evidence is
required for another reform
of the skills system and the
review of level 3 qualifications proposed and that unless T - level implementation is properly planned, resourced and funded, there is a risk that their
standards will be watered down to make existing level 2 qualifications «fit».
The state would be
required to establish English / language arts and math
standards review committees composed
of teachers, parents, principals, lawmakers and others to assist in the
review.
At the conclusion
of the
review, no later than Jan. 1, 2017, the superintendent would be
required to recommend to the state school board any necessary changes to the math and English / language arts
standards «necessary to assure that the
standards are college and career ready.»
The bill, if passed by the full Legislature, now would only
require state Schools Superintendent Michael Martirano to conduct a «comprehensive
review of the
standards.»
Members
of the Academic
Standards Review Commission have until December 2015 to suggest changes to North Carolina's standards, which include Common Core, to the State Board of Education, which is then required to take those suggestions into account while conducting its own review of the academic stan
Review Commission have until December 2015 to suggest changes to North Carolina's
standards, which include Common Core, to the State Board
of Education, which is then
required to take those suggestions into account while conducting its own
review of the academic stan
review of the academic
standards.
Here's why: The same legislation that
requires state education officials
review the Common Core also says the State Board
of Education must use the nationally - crafted
standards «as the base model» for any new
standards they might write.
She helped lead the statehouse push to
require a more formal
review of the
standards.
The legislation that triggered a
review of Indiana's academic
standards also
required the state's Office
of Management and Budget to prepare an analysis
of the cost
of transitioning to Common Core, the nationally crafted academic
standards state education officials adopted back in 2010.
The mentor's role in guiding Residents in their action research projects and development
of the State -
required Professional Growth Plan for Year 3
of employment, and
reviewing the Summative Assessment and criteria for recommending
standard principal certification will complete the training.
In addition, though, the bill would have prohibited the use
of any «federally - provided or
required» set
of standards, and it would have given the Legislature authority to
review and approve any new
standards the state board submits.
The bill being circulated for sponsors by Rep. Dean Knudson, R - Hudson, would
require the state Department
of Public Instruction to
review academic
standards every six years on a rotating basis.
Charter schools» boards
of directors would be
required to set policy for
reviewing applicants» criminal histories and would be held accountable for gross negligence in the event that they do not adhere to this
standard.
Lawmakers agreed to suspend rollout
of Common Core in the spring pending further
review, leaving teachers unsure which
standards to teach, as the pause legislation also
requires the state to administer the ISTEP + for another year.
The administration has also ignored red flags raised by peer
review panels it has put in place to vet the submitted proposals — including concerns that states didn't present their proposals to American Indian tribes as
required under both the waiver process (as well as under federal and state laws), and that D.C.'s plan for implementing Common Core reading and math
standards was not «realistic and
of high quality».
The founders
of the proposed Quest Academy Charter School had appealed the third
of those rejections, this one by former state Education Commissioner Rochelle Hendricks, as failing to meet a
required «
standard of review.»
Please see Appendix B -3-2 for the goals, activities, timelines, and responsible parties for higher educations role in training teachers to use data for
review of student achievement against our new
standards, as
required in Section B (3).
This process
requires the State Board
of Education to post the current
standards to a
standards review website to allow the public to
review and offer feedback.
The Legislature's budget committee Wednesday voted to
require a
review of the state's new math and reading
standards and to halt implementation
of national science and social studies
standards.
Applicants that agree to DOT's
standard terms for secured loans would likely experience a reduction in Letter
of Interest and application
review time and the cost
of DOT's outside advisors due to the minimal negotiation
required to document the transaction.
Based on a pick - and - choose menu
of services that includes more than just editing — which right away is a departure from the
standard, as too many «author services» companies
require all or none expensive packages — the platform is delving into things like
review services that will send out copies
of an author's book to their channels, along with talks
of translation (an ungodly expense for indie authors that can easily cost upwards
of tens
of thousands
of dollars per language) and audiobook services.
The first draft
of your PhD letter
of recommendation is downloaded through our members area and you will be able to
review it and request any changes that are
required to bring it to the
standard you expect.
Applications are
reviewed by a committee to ensure that they meet the high
standards of practice that the CVM
requires.
Report: UN IPCC's reliance on WWF may compromise EPA's claim that IPCC peer
review «meets the statutory
standards required of EPA peer
review» (Climate Depot)
Requires the Secretary to: (1) designate product models
of appliances, equipment, or electronics as Best - in - Class Product models; (2)
review best - in - class
standards annually; and (3) establish monitoring and verification protocols for energy consumption tests for each product model and for sales
of energy - efficient models.
Requires the EPA Administrator, by 2025 and every five years thereafter, to
review the
standards for new covered EGUs and reduce the maximum carbon dioxide emission rate for new covered EGUs to a rate that reflects the degree
of emission limitations achievable through the application
of the best system
of emission reduction that has been adequately demonstrated.
APS has worked to ensure that the climate change statement
review is a deliberative process and adheres to the rigorous scientific
standards the Society
requires of all public statements.
As «influential scientific or statistical information,» the National Assessment also fails the FDQA's «reproducibility»
standard, which
requires transparency regarding data and methods
of analysis, «a quality
standard above and beyond some peer
review quality
standards.»
As the statutorily designed steering document for policymaking, the National Assessment is «influential scientific or statistical information»; therefore, it must also meet a «reproducibility»
standard that
requires transparency regarding data and methods
of analysis, «as a quality
standard above and beyond some peer
review quality
standards.»
Several
of the leading carbon
standards require accredited organizations to
review and «validate» projects.
The Public Service Commission will
requires triennial
reviews of the Clean Energy
Standard by the Public Service Commission to ensure economic and clean energy goals are being achieved.
The
standard inter-glacial temperature deviation and the overall climactic history
of the Earth
require a
review of the forces behind such climate shifts which include: volcanic activity, plate positioning via tectonics, overall cyclicity
of warming / cooling events, and insolation with a view towards solar output and increased warming
of Mars.
To give one concrete example
of what these
standards should accomplish, papers should not be published (and if published, should not be treated by professional scientists as «peer
reviewed») without contemporary, unqualified access to all data and methods
required for others to reproduce the work.
But E.P.A. officials argue that the carbon capture technology has been used in several locations and that a
review of the industry over the past year proves that owners
of new coal - fired power plants can meet the new
standards as
required by the act.
The
standard of review almost always
requires the petitioner to show that the failure to prosecute was «an abuse
of prosecutorial discretion.»
The Teachers» Federation submits that the trial judge fundamentally misunderstood and incorrectly applied the applicable law to the facts
of the case; applied an incorrect
standard of review of a union's conduct, and imposed duties not
required of it by law.