No concept of a god that would be even remotely worthy of worship would
require such a violation of integrity.
Not exact matches
Professions like medicine, nursing, and engineering are effectively given monopolies over fields of practice because (or so the story goes) their work is so complex, and
requires such nuanced judgment, that only the members of the profession itself are qualified to set standards and to adjudicate
violations.
You acknowledge, consent and agree that we may access, preserve, and disclose your registration and any other information you provide if
required to do so by law or in a good faith belief that
such access preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (a) comply with legal process; (b) enforce this Agreement; (c) respond to claims of a
violation of the rights of third - parties; (d) respond to your requests for customer service; or (e) protect the rights, property, or personal safety of The Defense Alliance of Minnesota, The Defense Alliance of Minnesota Affiliates, its users and the public.
Such cosmologies are almost always «vitalistic» in the sense of
requiring auxiliary and somewhat ad hoc hypotheses to account for the apparent
violation of the law of entropy in the impetus toward greater complexity manifested in the evolutionary process.6 Evolutionary cosmologies thus perpetuate a much older tradition of Romantic Naturphilosophie far more than providing a fully contemporary philosophy of science or some sort of «scientifically - verified» philosophy.7
It is exactly
such a sentimental and superstitious understanding of miracles - namely, as God's arbitrary
violation of the natural order to heed clamant human request - that Alyosha is
required to surrender.
By using the Website you acknowledge and agree that Non-GMO Project may access, preserve, and disclose your Account Information and any Posted Content associated with that Account if
required to do so by law or in a good - faith belief that
such access preservation or disclosure is reasonably necessary to: (a) satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, (b) enforce this Agreement, including the investigation of potential
violations thereof, (c) detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or technical issues (including, without limitation, the filtering of spam), (d) respond to user support requests, or (e) protect the rights, property or safety of Non-GMO Project, its users and the public.
More difficult to accept were disruptions
such as four players» involvement in the Academy - wide honor - code
violations of 1976 and a written ultimatum to Smith from the top brass that
required seven victories in 1977, including one over Navy, for him to keep his job.
States
such as Connecticut also
require that you attend a mandatory child restraint education program for first or second
violations.
The law also
requires that students who report incidents of sexual assault be granted amnesty for campus
violations —
such as the use of alcohol or drugs.
Under the agreement announced today, judges will be
required to consider well established risk factors,
such as an offender's prior
violation of an order of protection and the accused's access to guns.
Imports can be refused for botulism, filth, rotting foods, or other blatant food - safety concerns, as well as for «less dramatic
violations,»
such as the lack of
required documentation.
To the extent that the Secretary determines that the authority to adopt and impose
such violations and penalties by rule
requires further statutory authority, the Secretary shall report
such determination to Congress as soon as
such determination is made, but not later than 1 year after the enactment of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.
(a) Whenever there shall be a
violation of this section an application may be made by the attorney general in the name of the people of the state of New York to a court or justice having jurisdiction by a special proceeding to issue an injunction, and upon notice to the defendant of not less than five days, to enjoin and restrain the continuance of
such violation; and if it shall appear to the satisfaction of the court or justice that the defendant has, in fact, violated this section, an injunction may be issued by the court or justice, enjoining and restraining any further
violations, without
requiring proof that any person has, in fact, been injured or damaged thereby.
25.6.3 in any matter that involves any of the foregoing claims, for resolution or decision of any question of fact or law
required to resolve
such claim, including, but not limited to, questions
required to decide or rule with respect to the infringement, misappropriation, validity, enforceability or ownership of any copyright, patent, trade secret, trademark, service mark or trade dress or with respect to any remedy or relief at law or in equity for any
such infringement or misappropriation or for any
violation of
such Sections 1201 and / or 1202.
(a) From each State's allotment under this part for any fiscal year (including any additional payment to it under section 110 (b)-RRB-, the Secretary shall pay to
such State an amount equal to the Federal share of the * cost of vocational REHABILITATION services under the plan for
such State approved under section 101, including expenditures for the administration of the State plan, except that the total of
such payments to
such State for
such fiscal year may not exceed its allotment under subsection (a)(and its additional payment under subsection (b), if any) of section 110 for
such year and
such payments shall not be made in an amount which would result in a
violation of the provisions of the State plan
required by clause (17) of section 101 (a), and except that the amount otherwise payable to
such State for
such year under this section shall be reduced by the amount (if any) by which expenditures from non - Federal sources during
such year under this title are less than expenditures under the State plan for the fiscal year ending June * 30, 1972, under the Vocational REHABILITATION ACT.
The Office of the Secretary (OST) is amending its drug and alcohol testing procedures to authorize employers to disclose to State commercial driver licensing (CDL) authorities the drug and alcohol
violations of employees who hold CDLs and operate commercial motor vehicles (CMVs), when a State law
requires such reporting.
-- In the case of
violations of sections 302 (b)(2)(A)(iv) and section 303 (a), injunctive relief shall include an order to alter facilities to make
such facilities readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities to the extent
required by this title.
-- To the extent that compliance with subsection (b)(2)(C) or (b)(7) would significantly alter the historic or antiquated character of a historical or antiquated rail passenger car, or a rail station served exclusively by
such cars, or would result in
violation of any rule, regulation, standard, or order issued by the Secretary of Transportation under the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970,
such compliance shall not be
required.
In addition, this notice addresses the general question of whether carriers may
require health documentation for carriage of service animals on flights from the U.S. into countries other than the U.K.. On February 26, 2007, the U.S. Department of Transportation's Aviation Enforcement Office issued a guidance document to assist carriers and passengers with disabilities in complying with both U.S. and U.K. regulations concerning the transport of service animals on flights from the U.S. to the U.K. by: 1) explaining the procedures passengers must follow to comply with the U.K.'s Pet Travel Scheme (PETS); 2) explaining the procedures U.S. and foreign carriers must follow to obtain an approved
Required Method of Operation (RMOP) from the U.K.'s Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA); and 3) notifying both U.S. and U.K. carriers operating flights between the U.S. and the U.K. that failure to obtain an approved RMOP from DEFRA will be considered a
violation of the ACAA by the Department's Aviation Enforcement Office and may subject
such carriers to enforcement action.1 The purpose of this notice is to respond to inquiries from airlines and the traveling public since issuance of the February notice regarding foreign requirements for health 1 72
This order
requires AAI to cease and desist from
such violations and assesses the company a compromise civil penalty of $ 150,000.
A court may
require disclosure of
such information if it is necessary to prevent a manifest injustice, help establish a
violation of law, or prevent harm to the public health or safety.
No order of the court shall
require the admission or reinstatement of an individual as a member of a union or the hiring, reinstatement, or promotion of an individual as an employee, or the payment to him of any back pay, if
such individual was refused admission, suspended, or expelled or was refused employment or advancement or was suspended or discharged for any reason other than discrimination on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin or in
violation of section 704 (a).
The proposed Final Judgment further
requires the Antitrust Compliance Officer to ensure that each
such person receives training related to the proposed Final Judgment and the antitrust laws; to ensure certification by each
such person of compliance with the terms of the proposed Final Judgment; to conduct an annual antitrust compliance audit; to be available to receive information concerning
violations of the proposed Final Judgment and to take appropriate action to remedy any
violations of the proposed Final Judgment; and to maintain a log of communications between officers and directors of Settling Defendants, involved in the development of strategies related to e-books, and any person associated with another Publisher Defendant, where that communication relates to the selling of books in any format in the United States.
You agree to abide by any additional rules and restrictions that the Accommodation Supplier may
require and
violation of
such additional rules and restrictions may result in additional charges and the cancellation of your Accommodation Booking.
The Cooper Union
requires Personnel to report to The Cooper Union good - faith concerns about behavior that appears to violate this Code, and under this Code a «Whistleblower» is the individual reporting
such activity.The Cooper Union strictly prohibits any harassment, retaliation, or adverse employment consequences against any Whistleblower who, in good faith, reports a
violation or suspected
violation of this Code, and any person who retaliates against a Whistleblower is subject to appropriate disciplinary and corrective action, up to and including termination of employment in the case of an employee.
The Cooper Union
requires Personnel to report to The Cooper Union good - faith concerns about behavior that appears to violate this Code, and under this Code a «Whistleblower» is the individual reporting
such activity.The Cooper Union strictly prohibits any harassment, retaliation, or adverse employment consequences against any Whistleblower who, in good faith, reports a
violation or suspected
violation of this Code, and any person who retaliates against a Whistleblower is subject to appropriate disciplinary and corrective action, up to and including termination of employment in the case of an employee.
To the extent that the Secretary determines that the authority to adopt and impose
such violations and penalties by rule
requires further statutory authority, the Secretary shall report
such determination to Congress as soon as
such determination is made, but not later than 1 year after the enactment of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009.
... for truly revolutionary claims,
such as discovery of the Higgs or of time reversal
violation, claims that count as extremely important discoveries, the community generally
requires 5 sigma.
Industry representatives argue that
such technology has not been proven on a large scale and would be extraordinarily expensive — and therefore in
violation of provisions in the Clean Air Act that
require the regulations to be adequately demonstrated and not exorbitant in cost.
The test for
such exclusion has evolved, but its latest formulation
requires a balanced approach be adopted whereby the factors taken into account give consideration to the seriousness of the
violation, the effect on Charter - protected interests, and society's interest in the adjudication of the charge on its merits.
Another court explains that «the applicable remedy analysis for a Brady
violation is as follows: (1) a Brady
violation requires a remedy of a new trial; (2)
such new trial may
require striking evidence, a special jury instruction, or other additional curative measures tailored to address persistent prejudice; and (3) if the lingering prejudice of a Brady
violation has removed all possibility that the defendant could receive a new trial that is fair, the indictment must be dismissed.
The opinion concludes that
requiring a student to misuse Lexis or Westlaw as described above — or knowing of
such a
violation and failing to take reasonable remedial actions — is a
violation of Rule 5.3 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, pursuant to which a lawyer with supervisory authority over a non-lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that the person's conduct is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer.
Remedies
such as injunctive relief, and the various legal theories upon which recovery may be had, including breach of contract and lien law trust
violations,
require complete analysis.
The cases include some interesting issues,
such as the constitutionality of
requiring voters to show a photo ID before they may vote; the constitutionality of execution by lethal injection where the procedure poses a risk of pain and suffering in
violation of the Eighth Amendment ban on «cruel and unusual punishment»; and a Fourth Amendment case involving an unlawful search under state law that Volokh conspirator and Fourth Amendment guru Orin Kerr is interested in.
«In my view, this
violation was more suitably remedied by
requiring any
such [sentence - enhancing] facts to be submitted to the jury.»
I acknowledge and agree that
violation of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement by me may cause the Company irreparable harm, and therefore I agree that the Company will be entitled to seek extraordinary relief in court, including, but not limited to, temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions and permanent injunctions without the necessity of posting a bond or other security (or, where
such a bond or security is
required, I agree that a $ [NUMBER] bond will be adequate), in addition to and without prejudice to any other rights or remedies that the Company may have for a breach of this Employee Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement.
Topics discussed include: strategies for identifying the
required elements for a potential malpractice action; the evaluation of the defenses that might bar recovery or defeat a claim; establishing or refuting the applicable standard of care with expert testimony; identifying when a conflict of interest results in divided loyalties, when
such a conflict may form the basis of a claim, and the defenses to
such conflict of interest claims; and distinguishing malpractice liability from a
violation of professional ethical standards and if or when
such standards are relevant to litigating a malpractice claim.
A lawyer is
required to avoid contributing to a
violation of
such provisions.
A lawyer who knows of conduct involving a
violation of Rules other than Rule 8.4 (b) or (c) is not
required to report
such conduct.
Comment: Several commenters urged that the request for determination by the Secretary under proposed § 160.204 (a) be limited to cases where an exception is absolutely necessary, and that in making
such a determination, the Secretary should be
required to make a determination that the benefits of granting an exception outweigh the potential harm and risk of disclosure in
violation of the regulation.
Comment: One commenter recommended
requiring whistleblowers, pursuant to proposed § 164.518 (a)(4) of the NPRM, to raise the issue of a possible
violation of law with the affected covered entity before disclosing
such information to an oversight agency, attorney, or law enforcement official.
If a telephone company learns that a customer is monitoring conversations in
violation of the tariff, the order
requires the utility to discontinue service if the customer does not refrain from
such monitoring within five days after notice from the utilities.
Information
such as driver's license number and amount of moving
violations, if any, during the amount of time under review by the insurance company, may be
required to receive a rate.
In Pennsylvania, you will receive points on your driving record for committing traffic
violations,
such as excessive speeding or driving without the minimum
required auto insurance coverage.
New Hampshire will
require you to buy car insurance if you're convicted of certain
violations,
such as a DUI or leaving the scene of an accident.
We do not cover: 1) loss or expense recoverable under any other insurance or through an employer; 2) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: (a) dishonest or criminal acts committed or attempted by You; (b) alleged
violation of the laws of the country You are visiting, unless We determine
such allegations to be fraudulent, or c) failure to maintain
required documents or visas; 3) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: (a) debt, insolvency, business or commercial failure; (b) the repossession of any property; or © Your non - compliance with a contract, license or permit; 4) loss or expense arising from or due to liability assumed by You under any contract.
We do not cover: 1) loss or expense recoverable under any other insurance or through an employer; 2) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: a) dishonest or criminal acts committed or attempted by You; b) alleged
violation of the laws of the country You are visiting, unless We determine
such allegations to be fraudulent, or c) failure to maintain
required documents or visas; 3) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: a) debt, insolvency, business or commercial failure; b) the repossession of any property; or c) Your non - compliance with a contract, license or permit; 4) loss or expense arising from or due to liability assumed by You under any contract.
2) loss or expense arising from or attributable to: a) dishonest or criminal acts committed or attempted by You; b) alleged
violation of the laws of the country You are visiting, unless We determine
such allegations to be fraudulent, or c) failure to maintain
required documents or visas;
For residents of California and Florida who may have difficulty obtaining auto insurance from a standard market due to driving
violations or speeding tickets, Explorer Insurance can provide you with state
required auto insurance and also has some added perks to its auto insurance policy
such as towing / rental reimbursement coverage, glass repair deductible waiver and 24/7 emergency roadside assistance.
Usually, traffic
violations -
such as tickets for speeding less than ten miles per hour over the speed limit - will not
require you to appear in court.