Sentences with phrase «require time in court»

Traffic tickets are often civil infractions and don't require time in a court room to solve the issue.

Not exact matches

The prior three corporate convictions under the CFPOA have been achieved by the entering of guilty pleas.2 The Court also for the first time interpreted the meaning of key provisions in the statute, including clarifying that an inchoate offence of conspiracy exists under the CFPOA and in what circumstances a real and substantial connection will be required and found.

The VA usually requires a two - year waiting period following a Chapter 7 bankruptcy or foreclosure before it will insure a loan, and borrowers in Chapter 13 must have made at least 12 on - time payments and secure the approval of the bankruptcy court.

Pretty strong language, but no stronger than the metaphor Daniel Mitchell of the Heritage Foundation used, in an op - ed article in The Washington Times, to «describe a bill designed to prevent corporations from rechartering abroad for tax purposes: Mitchell described this legislation as the «Dred Scott tax bill,» referring to the infamous 1857 Supreme Court ruling that required free states to return escaped slaves.

Those 5 players were (at least at the time) try - hard, high energy players that might not be that skilled, but they left it all out on the court (actually, Delly left too much out there, requiring hospitalization to get fluids in him via IV, iirc).

From time to time, we may use your Personal Information and Traffic Data: (a) if we need to respond to valid legal process, including, but not limited to, a search warrant, subpoena, or court order, and any other instance when we believe we are required to do so by law; or (b) if we deem it necessary to disclose Personal Information or Traffic Data, in our sole discretion, to comply with any applicable law, regulation, legal process or governmental request, or to protect our rights or interests.

«Not only does ISL have the right to frame its own rules for the league and deal with related issues, including disciplinary issues, but in fact the AIFF has required ISL to regulate and sanction disciplinary issues,» said former Bombay High Court Chief Justice Kshitij Vyas, in a 21 - page order, according to The Times of India.

In cases where the parents share equal parenting time, the courts may determine that neither parent shall be required to pay child support to the other parent.

At the time plaintiff filed the motion for default judgment in default of defence, the defendants had not been served with any Statement of Claim as required under the Rules of Court in support of the amended Writ of Summons to which they could respond by way of a statement of defence.

The FDA has filed court papers in support of an effort to overturn a New York City law requiring calorie counts to be posted by certain establishments — at least the second time the Trump administration has inserted itself into a local case.

A Senate race in Michigan against Stabenow — who has won three terms including beating an incumbent Republican in 2000 — wouldn't be easy and would require any candidate trying to replace her to spend a lot of time courting voters at town halls, rallies and debates, as well as developing a media strategy.

(4) The independent panel shall report as approved for each judicial position all highly qualified persons who make application to the panel, provided that if the number of highly qualified applicants exceeds three times the number of existing vacancies to be filled in such position (determined as of the time the panel renders its report), the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position, provided further that if the number of highly qualified applicants is less than three times the number of vacancies to be filled in such position the independent panel shall report as approved the most highly qualified applicants in a number equal to not less than two times the number of such vacancies, provided further that the following categories of applicants who are eligible for reelection or reappointment shall be reported as approved if their performance during their term of office merits continuation in office, and no other applicants shall be reported as approved for their vacancies: (a) a judge or justice completing a full term of office seeking re-election to that office, or (b) an interim Supreme Court justice who has been appointed by the Governor to fill an existing vacancy no later than the previous June 1 after approval of the Governor's screening panel, who has been confirmed by the State Senate and has assumed office no later than the date the panel renders its report, and who otherwise would not be required to make application to the independent screening panel pursuant to the provisions of sub-paragraph (3).

The grounds on which these reliefs were sought by Zanetor in the Supreme Court were that; The learned judge erred in law when he assumed jurisdiction to interpret article 94 (1) of the constitution holding that once the applicant had put herself out as a contestant in the parliamentary primaries of the NDC she was caught by article 94 (1)(a) which requires that she must be a registered voter at the time of her participation in the primaries.

But determining what other «minor» charges might also better dealt with through civil penalties, summonses or desk appearances will require consultation with the NYPD and the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice, she said, as well as time to ensure that the court system is equipped to deal with an increase in summonses.

LA school officials are fighting a court order which requires the school district to offer more space to charter schools, reports Howard Blume in today's LA Times.

The Education Practices Commission may suspend the educator certificate of any person as defined in s. 1012.01 (2) or (3) for up to 5 years, thereby denying that person the right to teach or otherwise be employed by a district school board or public school in any capacity requiring direct contact with students for that period of time, after which the holder may return to teaching as provided in subsection (4); may revoke the educator certificate of any person, thereby denying that person the right to teach or otherwise be employed by a district school board or public school in any capacity requiring direct contact with students for up to 10 years, with reinstatement subject to the provisions of subsection (4); may revoke permanently the educator certificate of any person thereby denying that person the right to teach or otherwise be employed by a district school board or public school in any capacity requiring direct contact with students; may suspend the educator certificate, upon an order of the court or notice by the Department of Revenue relating to the payment of child support; or may impose any other penalty provided by law, if the person:

«For the first time, the Court said that the government is constitutionally required to provide aid to religious schools when it provides aid to private secular schools,» he wrote in an email.

(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.

The VA usually requires a two - year waiting period following a Chapter 7 bankruptcy or foreclosure before it will insure a loan, and borrowers in Chapter 13 must have made at least 12 on - time payments and secure the approval of the bankruptcy court.

The bankruptcy court may require filers to pay all of their missed mortgage payments in a time frame which may be difficult for many filers to do.

Certainly, mounting a defence in court is likely to require them to explain how they reach the # 35 a time cost.

Tennis courts (unlimited use day and night within operating hours), includes equipment (balls and rackets); proper attire and court shoes required Mini golf (reservation required, unlimited use during opening times, equipment included) Water Sports: Diving (1 lesson free per stay in the pool).

In British Columbia and Quebec this could be assisted by the online court document systems that are available for those provinces, but in other jurisdictions it would likely require physically traveling to a courthouse to access physical files or doing a live collection of data over a period of timIn British Columbia and Quebec this could be assisted by the online court document systems that are available for those provinces, but in other jurisdictions it would likely require physically traveling to a courthouse to access physical files or doing a live collection of data over a period of timin other jurisdictions it would likely require physically traveling to a courthouse to access physical files or doing a live collection of data over a period of time.

In addition, understanding that the need for an attorney to be aggressive and proactive requires energy and confidence to go into court with little time to prepare and litigate a matter that can be volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous.

At least the court revised the insurer's proposed terms to circumscribe the obligation in these terms: «The defence insurer shall be entitled to require the claimant to undergo medical examination at its request upon reasonable notice being given to the claimant at any time during the claimant's lifetime, such medical examinations to be limited to obtaining a medical opinion as to the claimant's general health in order to obtain a quotation for the purchase cost of an annuity to fund the periodical payments and / or (not more frequently than once every seven years) for the express purposes of reviewing its reserve.

The revised policy also introduces a Registered Access process for frequent users.This is for people who require regular access to multiple court records in one case file, or to single or multiple court records in more than one case file without having to complete a Request for Court Records each court records in one case file, or to single or multiple court records in more than one case file without having to complete a Request for Court Records each court records in more than one case file without having to complete a Request for Court Records each Court Records each time.

It argued that there was improper substantiation, but the appellate court noted the 30 pages of detailed time entries in an attorney declaration sufficed because California does not absolutely require submission of billing statements.

The drafters of the Enabling Act were required to write detailed legislation that for the first time provides enforcement mechanisms for court orders in this area.

Finally, it is often required by many courts that, in order to be labeled a seaman, a maritime employee must spend at least 30 % of his or her time aboard the vessel; however, this amount of time is simply a ballpark figure and is not used as a cut - off line.

The court has used its discretion to deny an application for the production of documents in the following two circumstances: firstly, where thousands of documents of only possible relevance are in question; and secondly, where the documents sought do not have significant probative value and the value of production is outweighed by competing interests such as confidentiality and time and expense required for the party to produce the documents: Park at para. 15.

determining that, as a result of recent Supreme Court decisions, the litigation was now «prohibitively high - risk», but nevertheless requiring the plaintiff to incur the time, expense and exposure in proceeding with a class action that had become no longer viable.

Often times, our clients aren't required to appear in court, allowing our attorneys to easily dissolve or reduce the penalty while our clients are elsewhere — meaning you will not have to worry about losing work wages due to a court appearance.

At the same time, the court deferred ruling on the bar's claim that LegalZoom is engaged in unauthorized practice, concluding that a more extensive factual record is required in order to explain questions such as how LegalZoom's process prepares complex documents for its customers.

In a display of Parliamentary deference I can only describe as bizarre, a 6 - 3 majority of the SCC ruled that although «the concept of consent Parliament has adopted may seem unrealistic», the court was bound to strictly apply the statutory definition of sexual assault which requires that an individual be capable of revoking consent at any time during the course of the sexual activity.

It will be interesting to see whether the court will permit parties involved in complex high - stakes patent cases to call multiple experts but require them to confer before trial to see what they can agree on and / or to testify together at trial to reduce the trial time (see points five and six below).

Although there may be a hybrid approach which lies somewhere in the middle of these two options, it is clear that the present system is inordinately complex, requires enormous funding to maintain, and is largely inaccessible to litigants without counsel at a time when such litigants are flooding the courts.

The Court of Appeal for England and Wales has recently decided, in Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 804 that the «responsible journalism in the public interest» defence to defamation requires that an online archive of a story must be updated to take account of exculpatory developments.

Within the past decade, banking and insurance companies have hired historical legal experts and spent a lot of time litigation over the US Federal Court system's power to issue equitable remedies such as the Mareva injunction and equitable liens to seize assets in federal litigation; the Alien Torts Act which has been used by international human rights organizations had its breadth restricted by use of 18th century views of the «law of nations» requiring recourse to historic writers like Hugo Grotius, and even administrative law has come under assault by dissents of Justice Thomas arguing that the «Chevron» doctrine of deference to agency interpretations of their own statutes should be set aside as being incompatible with the understanding of the American separation of powers doctrine as it was understood at the time of the country's founding.

The court found these provisions to violate s. 7 of the Charter because it required offenders to serve more time in prison than they would otherwise, which is disproportionate.

It is time that the courts begin to address whether revolutionary changes in technology require changes to existing Fourth Amendment doctrine.

Whether in a divorce or a legal separation proceeding, the courts are required to grant parenting time to both parents when requested to do so.

It requires a decision by the parties, at the time of making their agreement, to take any dispute outside of the court system and have it settled in private by an arbitrator jointly funded by the parties.

If the majority is right, however, and Vonner requires either the inquiry undertaken or the outcome reached by the majority, then the time has come for this Court to reconsider the wisdom of our decision in Vonner.

Although smaller firms know what they want in a reporter, finding the time and resources to determine whether a reporter meets their qualifications can prove difficult, and usually results in their using one of two methods to find the right reporters: seeking professional references from other law firms that require litigation services, or seeking reporters through the aid of court reporter firms.

The Promise to Appear is a document that the accused will be required to sign prior to release stating that the accused will appear in court on a specific time and date.

If you are not satisfied with how your matter is being handled, you have the right to discharge your attorney and terminate the attorney - client relationship at any time (court approval may be required in some matters and your attorney may have a claim against you for the value of services rendered to you up to the point of discharge).

If there are children involved in your divorce, we expect your fee would fall on the higher end of the range as additional court forms are required by the court in these cases which take additional time to prepare and complete.

The Court ruled that the scheme was a tax avoidance arrangement and commented in particular on the risk that the scheme would never be a profitable one, the gratuitous use of the promissory note mechanism and the timing mismatch between when expenditure was legally incurred and the point when it was required to be paid «in an economic sense».

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has been clear that the failure to compensate for loss, other than in exceptional circumstances, in relation to this particular right in A1P1 may not conform with the required «fair balance» and proportionality (see Jahn v Germany [2004] ECHR 36 at [93]- [94]; James v UK (1986) Series A No 98, esp at [54]; cf the admissibility decision in Di Palma v UK (1988) 10 EHRR 149 but the ECtHR has clearly moved on since that time).

In North Carolina, where I practice, this third - year practice rule requires the licensed attorney to be personally present any time a law student makes a court appearance.