Sentences with phrase «required big energy»

Ms Milne said the government last year rejected Greens» amendments requiring big energy users to implement energy savings which could reduce annual emissions by 35 million tonnes.

Not exact matches

But a small concern can grow big enough to become an official issue that needs to be dealt with — suddenly requiring more time and energy than if it had been fixed earlier.

A big Shell energy project can require investing $ 10 billion on the front end — with the understanding that profits, assuming they materialize as planned, probably won't come for a decade or more.

What kind of energy was required to turn on a dime and create a new approach to your product, or to let go of all the investment and attachment you had to your product's success and starting planning your next big thing?

In Pennsylvania, for example, a well - known, big box retailer uses solar equipment financed by PNC Energy Capital to provide a majority of the power required to operate five of its stores.

So far, you've realized that executing a profitable 51 % assault on a big blockchain requires large quantities of hashing energy.

The fact is, the original hypothesis, the Big Bang theory, requires a immense bit of energy to produce all the energy and matter that exists in the entire universe.

«Evidence (that) strongly suggests that there was a beginning to our universe» would require something to show a «universe» with zero mass, zero energy at the moment of the big bang.

Let me lust list some areas that will require government action and planning: rejuvenating the centers of big cities, providing mass transportation systems, controlling pollution, maintaining open spaces and recreational areas, taking care of future energy needs, making health care available to all.

Instead of looking at efficiency, and getting the inputs and outputs optimised, the meat and other industries have traditionally employed big lagoons requiring huge amounts of energy to aerate.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Regulatory agencies devote most of their energy to answering two questions: How much of a given chemical is required to kill a non-target insect outright, and how likely is it that beneficial species will encounter a dose that big?

The bigger the energy, the stronger the magnet needed to deflect the particles and the more space required to register their properties.

The bigger the tunnel, the less energy is required to keep the beams in the correct route.

Knowing how much oxygen they use, for example, would indicate how much energy jellies require, how much prey they need to consume, and thus how big a player they are in the underwater food web.

The biggest required high - energy — density explosives packed into a cylinder nearly a meter across and 6.7 meters long, says Beth Dzenitis, an engineer at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California who oversaw part of the field campaign.

«That will require inexpensive batteries and other low - cost technologies big enough to store surplus clean energy for use on demand.»

The results are interesting, but Disconzi acknowledges that Big Rip theories still require a bit of work to make sense, particularly the part about infinite energy being released.

The bigger a bird species» chicks, the more energy they require, but some species need more energy than others even after accounting for size.

The bigger the muscles, the more energy they require for proper functioning, resulting in increased calorie expenditure.

Breastfeeding is a big commitment; it requires a lot of energy and organization and can be both exhausting and time - consuming.

The weighted (or body - weighted) exercises are predominately big compound movements which require a lot of energy to perform, combined with intense plyometric and cardio - based exercises — meaning you get great bang for your buck.

By training, eating and supplementing your nervous system for optimized power and speed, you can build an impressive body that also contains the muscle machinery necessary for amazing quality of life and function, rather than big, bulky muscle that requires excessive energy to carry and cool, and excessive antioxidants to repair.

Tim Harford explains the numbers and statistics used in everyday life AND because the place was so big, I felt obliged to get roommates — who required more time, more energy, to manage.

The biggest challenge for me and my staff has been simply that it is time - consuming and requires an unbelievable amount of mental and emotional energy to start up a school and support our students throughout the process.

The Warm Home Discount requires the big suppliers, by law, to help vulnerable customers in the UK pay for energy.

People surrender dogs to shelters for reasons like «I didn't know she'd require grooming every month» to «he got too big» to «she has too much energy.»

A pet dog requires a bigger investment of time and energy than does a cat.

So, apparently, if I understand this correctly, the idea is really about a way that actually requires an independent source of energy (and a big one) in order to make liquid fuels and other hydrocarbon - based products in a relatively «carbon - neutral» way.

Re # 332, «yes, that is very true (after reading more data) that its around 5 - 7 GWh per annum per turbine but the bigger they are the larger the space between them and hence the amount of land required yields not more energy (or a little more as the turbines are built higher.»

And while I'm not personally a fan of ethanol, the plant described at the following link seems to address many of the concerns about ethanol and big - scale farming by treating wastes from one process as feedstock into another and reducing the amount of energy required at each stage.

Gates hammered on points reported here for many years: that without a big, and sustained, boost in spending on basic research and development on energy frontiers, the chances of triggering an energy revolution are nil; that while the private sector and venture capital investors are vital for transforming breakthroughs into marketable products or services, they will not invest in the long - haul inquiry that's required to generate game - changing breakthroughs; that a 1 or 2 percent tax on carbon - emitting fuels could generate a large, steady stream of money for invigorating the innovation pipeline; that a declining emissions cap and credit trading system --- if it could survive America's polarized politics --- would have to raise energy costs far beyond what would be politically tenable to generate a similar scale of transformational activity.

a) Spend a big chunk of $ $ on deployment of what works already, knowing that volume & experience will help costs come down, and of course, in the energy case, there are plenty of efficiencies around that are zero - cost, although they may require upfront capital.

The struggle to initiate the big shifts in behavior and technology that would be required to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in a world with a fast - growing energy appetite is of epic scale.

The IEA has estimated that cumulative energy - sector investment of $ 17 trillion (in 2004 dollars) will be required by 2030 in order to finance its Reference Scenario, and has said that â $ œFinancing the required investments in non-OECD countries is one of the biggest sources of uncertainty surrounding our energy - supply projectionsâ $?

«While longer blades may allow project developers to produce more energy from their turbines, they will also require bigger towers to support them.

inferring support for energy policy from the DoD interest in the above stated risks associated with climate variability and change requires a big leap of logic.

Meat is also a very resource - intensive food, requiring lots of energy, land, water and feed, which makes the climate impact of eating meat bigger than almost all other foods.

I feel the biggest uncertainties are on leakage of CO2 from the storage sites over 100 years and a probable underestimate in the amount of energy required per tonne of CO2 extracted from the atmosphere.

In the chapter, «If it isn't boring, it isn't green,» on page 290 he starts a new section by saying «But to get the most efficiency gains and to make the Energy Internet - smart grid complete requires that one more big piece of the puzzle be put into place — electrifying transportation, and moving as many cars, trucks, buses and trains away from exclusively combustion engines and into plug - in electric hybrids or plug - in all - electric cars.»

But it turns out that countries with far higher levels of so - called variable renewables are doing without capacity markets at all, finding that other measures are sufficient, such as investing in transmission capacity, reforming power markets and requiring renewable energy technologies themselves to play a bigger role in meeting power demand.

This democratizes energy choices, promotes competition, speeds learning and innovation, and can further accelerate deployment — because «vernacular» technologies accessible to many diverse market actors, even if individually small, tend to deploy faster in sum than a few big units requiring specialized institutions, complex approvals, intricate logistics, and hence long lead times.

Confronting backbenchers in his own party who wanted big cuts in on land wind, Tim Yeo, Tory chair of the all - party energy and climate change select committee, commented «The way to deal with this - and realise the savings the Treasury wants to achieve - is to have more onshore renewable energy, which requires lower levels of subsidy, and less offshore, which requires more.

The lobbying battle over the EU 2030 climate and energy will keep unfolding over the coming months, extending to a new Parliament and a new Commission and it is crucial that Europe's decision - makers set the goals for the continent according to what science requires and to the principles of climate justice, and not to the wishes of big business.»

The key is that wealthier households use more energy, on average — they drive and fly more, have bigger (and sometimes multiple) houses, and buy more stuff that requires energy to manufacture and use.

Naysayers had argued that climate change was just too big a problem, too expensive to solve, requiring as it does an overhaul of the world's energy systems and economy.

In our world, the biggest ice machines require the most power in and require the most energy removed.

The bigger the range, the bigger the hood, the bigger the makeup air unit required, the more energy needed to condition the makeup air.

Host Annie Leonard introduces the energy traders and Wall Street financiers at the heart of this scheme and reveals the «devils in the details» in current cap and trade proposals: free permits to big polluters, fake offsets and distraction from what's really required to tackle the climate crisis.

irrigation was a big part of the paper a colleague and I have pending publication called «Burning Water - The Energy Return on Water Invested» - using irrigated water numbers, the best biofuels required 10 times the water input as the most water intensive fossil fuel.