If he had been
required by his religious beliefs to set fires on the balcony, the decision might have gone the other way.
Mike Fox describes a 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding Costco's dress code: The court upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was
required by her religious beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.»
Not exact matches
Researchers asked 1,000 Americans in a phone survey, «Should student
religious organizations, recognized
by publicly funded colleges, be allowed to
require their leaders to hold specific
beliefs?»
your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of
religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is
requiring this to happen, we are being educated
by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through experience.
Any place of business is
required by law (at least here in GA) to accomodate any
religious belief in so far as it does not impose an «undo hardship» upon the business.
I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion...
Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming
religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and
religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic
beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made
by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....
Maryland, Article 37: That no
religious test ought ever to be
required as a qualification for any office of profit or trust in this State, other than a declaration of
belief in the existence of God; nor shall the Legislature prescribe any other oath of office than the oath prescribed
by this Const itution.
Meditation can be practised
by anyone and adherence to
religious practices of any kind is not
required, Anyone can enjoy the benefits whatever their
religious or spiritual
beliefs.
The majority of democracies fulfill this purpose both
by underwriting schools that comport with their citizens» philosophical,
religious, and pedagogical
beliefs — whether Catholic, Calvinist, socialist, Jewish, or Montessori — and also
by requiring that those schools deliver similar curricular content, albeit through their own, distinctive lenses.
And, «lawyers are statutorily
required to uphold the public interest in the administration of justice
by preserving and protecting the rights and freedoms of all persons» aren't
religious beliefs a part of this?
Taking L' H - D's analysis at face value, she should agree that a law
requiring all people employed
by the Quebec gov» t to work nude is at least prima facie constitutional (under that analysis) since all clothing can be seen as a merely a symbol of some
religious belief.