Sentences with phrase «required federal intervention»

All major civil rights gains to date in this country (abolition, women's sufferage, minority equality) have required federal intervention and prosecution of federal violators to prevent civil rights abuses.

Not exact matches

This requires urgent intervention by government if the much publicized anti-corruption agenda of the Federal Government must have meaning to Nigerians.

Kesan also believes that a «light - touch regulatory intervention» — that is, something similar to when the Federal Communications Commission required cellphone carriers to allow users to port their phone numbers to different carriers — would be beneficial.

The reason the federal government doesn't recommend everyone shoot for under 100 is that despite the lower risk accompanying more optimal cholesterol levels, the intensity of clinical intervention required to achieve such levels for everyone in the population would «financially overload the health care system.

If the gaps between groups exceed state - determined thresholds for «significant disproportionality,» the state must examine local policies and require the district to devote more of its federal special education funds to early intervention.

To prevent federal courts from premature intervention, plaintiffs are normally required to show that all administrative remedies have been pursued before a lawsuit was filed.

Such intervention was also required under the previous federal law, but without the explicit requirements and timetables of NCLB.

Several attempts to attend school were thwarted by the persistence of the National Guard and protesters, requiring the intervention of federal judge Richard Davies, who ordered the removal of the guard from the school, and President Dwight Eisenhower, who sent troops from the U.S. Army's 101st Airborne Division to manage the scene.

ESSA does require states to rank all schools and act to improve the lowest performing, but the types of interventions are not specified in federal law.

The bill would require states to have «college and career - ready standards» for student performance and would replace a system of proficiency targets that labeled many schools as failing with a focus on federal intervention in underperforming schools.

Complete all annual reviews and behavior intervention plans required by Federal and State mandates

With this flexibility, however, the federal government should require states or districts to take action in schools where all students or groups of students are persistently not making progress, with the most rigorous interventions focused on the schools and students that are furthest behind.

Research has shown that key interventions, which would require commitment at both the federal and state levels, can boost high school graduation rates.

Like all states, Maryland has been working to create a plan for complying with the new federal Every Student Succeeds Act, which gives states renewed authority over school accountability while requiring standardized testing and interventions in low - performing schools.

Federal law requires the lowest - performing 5 percent of schools receiving federal funding be identified in the 2018 school year for more intense intervention by the state to help them iFederal law requires the lowest - performing 5 percent of schools receiving federal funding be identified in the 2018 school year for more intense intervention by the state to help them ifederal funding be identified in the 2018 school year for more intense intervention by the state to help them improve.

Because early intervention is so important, federal law requires that school districts provide early identification and intervention services.

«We have a large population of students that, through federal law, require intensive interventions and that takes a lot of resources that need to be spent in that direction,» Langyel says.

But because of the state of law society management, that would require socialized law, which would require coordinated federal - provincial government intervention into the provision of legal services.

The Federal Court held that there is not, nor has there ever been, a statutory exclusion for business methods in Canada: «[To] implement a business method exception would be a «radical departure» from the current regime requiring parliamentary intervention».